Context
We have established the DDD architecture for DeepracticeNodeSpec:
domains/ - Business logic layer
packages/ - Infrastructure layer (technical capabilities)
configs/ - Development standards
apps/ - Presentation layer (CLI, Desktop, Web)
services/ - Application services layer
Proposal
Develop the NodeSpec CLI by building a real project alongside it: DeepracticeAccount
Strategy: Learning by Doing
Instead of designing the CLI in isolation, we'll use the dogfooding approach:
- Start building DeepracticeAccount (authentication/account service)
- When we need a feature, add it to the CLI
- Immediately test it with DeepracticeAccount
- Iterate based on real needs
Benefits
✅ Real requirements - CLI features driven by actual needs, not assumptions
✅ Fast feedback - Discover issues immediately in real usage
✅ Prevent over-engineering - Only build what's actually needed
✅ Better UX - Design decisions informed by real developer experience
✅ Two products at once - Build NodeSpec CLI + DeepracticeAccount simultaneously
CLI Feature Priorities (driven by DeepracticeAccount needs)
Phase 1: Project Bootstrap
nodespec create project DeepracticeAccount
# Generate: package.json, tsconfig, eslint, prettier, commitlint
# Setup: pnpm workspace, turbo, git hooks
Phase 2: Package Creation (as needed)
nodespec create package auth
nodespec create package user
Phase 3: Development Commands (as needed)
nodespec dev # Run development server
nodespec test # Run tests
nodespec build # Build project
nodespec typecheck # Type checking
Phase 4: Documentation/Guides (as needed)
nodespec guide commitlint
nodespec guide testing
Implementation Plan
Week 1-2: Minimal CLI + Account Project Setup
Week 3-4: Iterate based on Account development needs
Ongoing: Continuous refinement
- CLI evolves with each DeepracticeAccount pain point
- Templates updated based on best practices discovered
- Documentation written from real developer experience
Success Metrics
- DeepracticeAccount successfully built using only NodeSpec CLI
- Zero manual config - CLI handles all setup
- Developer happiness - Smooth, intuitive experience
- Reusable patterns - DeepracticeAccount's structure becomes a template for future projects
Related
This approach embodies our design philosophy:
- Convention over Configuration - CLI enforces NodeSpec standards
- AI-Readable - Clear, predictable structure
- Production Ready - Battle-tested through real usage
The best way to build a tool is to use it to build something real.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
Context
We have established the DDD architecture for DeepracticeNodeSpec:
domains/- Business logic layerpackages/- Infrastructure layer (technical capabilities)configs/- Development standardsapps/- Presentation layer (CLI, Desktop, Web)services/- Application services layerProposal
Develop the NodeSpec CLI by building a real project alongside it: DeepracticeAccount
Strategy: Learning by Doing
Instead of designing the CLI in isolation, we'll use the dogfooding approach:
Benefits
✅ Real requirements - CLI features driven by actual needs, not assumptions
✅ Fast feedback - Discover issues immediately in real usage
✅ Prevent over-engineering - Only build what's actually needed
✅ Better UX - Design decisions informed by real developer experience
✅ Two products at once - Build NodeSpec CLI + DeepracticeAccount simultaneously
CLI Feature Priorities (driven by DeepracticeAccount needs)
Phase 1: Project Bootstrap
Phase 2: Package Creation (as needed)
Phase 3: Development Commands (as needed)
Phase 4: Documentation/Guides (as needed)
Implementation Plan
Week 1-2: Minimal CLI + Account Project Setup
apps/clistructurenodespec create projectcommandWeek 3-4: Iterate based on Account development needs
Ongoing: Continuous refinement
Success Metrics
Related
This approach embodies our design philosophy:
The best way to build a tool is to use it to build something real.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code