Small things that needs to be clarified

[Groenbech96]

JGreaterThanOp should support doubles?

[Groenbech96]

codegen emits "class" instead of "interface". (not sure if we can fix this?)

[Baizey]

ville tror at alle ikke bit-wise operators skal supporter doubles

[cSkjaerris]

GreaterThanOp (and less than, if it exists) should support double. The project states we should have full support for doubles

[RMichelsen]

codegen emits "class" instead of "interface". (not sure if we can fix this?)

We now know this is by design, CLEmitter adClass emits .class files which can be either classes or interfaces

[Groenbech96]

@Baizey : In ForStatements this line was added List list = new ArrayList();
This parses as list < integer, and fails. Do we support generics in j--?

[Groenbech96]

Is do-while a thing we should support?

[RMichelsen]

Should we support scientific notation for doubles? e.g. 1e-9

[RMichelsen]

(Continue [identifier]) is parsed but no code is generated for it, should we care?

[cSkjaerris]

Is do-while a thing we should support?

It is not a part of the assignment, but we can add it.

Should we support scientific notation for doubles? e.g. 1e-9

If Java supports it, so should we

[Groenbech96]

Can someone verify JLogicalOrOp codegen?`