|
1 | 1 | --- |
2 | 2 | title: "Speaking as Barometer: How Chinese Diplomats' Words Reflect the Sino-American Relationship" |
3 | | -summary: "Sentiment and Word Cloud analysis of Chinese Foreign Ministry briefings (2002–2022)." |
| 3 | +summary: "A data-driven journalism project analyzing 20 years of Chinese Foreign Ministry press conferences using Sentiment Analysis in R." |
4 | 4 | tags: |
5 | 5 | - NLP |
6 | 6 | - Sentiment Analysis |
| 7 | +- R |
| 8 | +- Political Economy |
7 | 9 | - China Studies |
8 | 10 | date: "2023-01-15T00:00:00Z" |
9 | 11 |
|
| 12 | +# Links |
| 13 | +links: |
| 14 | +- name: Original Blog |
| 15 | + url: https://pwiweb.uzh.ch/wordpress/blog/2023/08/21/speaking-as-barometer-how-chinese-diplomats-words-reflect-the-sino-american-relationship/ |
| 16 | + icon_pack: fas |
| 17 | + icon: globe |
| 18 | +- name: R Code |
| 19 | + url: https://github.com/LinyingL/Datenjournalismus/blob/main/DDJ2.R |
| 20 | + icon_pack: fab |
| 21 | + icon: github |
| 22 | + |
10 | 23 | image: |
11 | | - caption: Word Cloud Visualization |
| 24 | + caption: "Word Cloud Analysis" |
12 | 25 | focal_point: Smart |
13 | 26 | --- |
14 | 27 |
|
15 | | -This project applied dictionary-based **Sentiment Analysis** to two decades of Chinese Foreign Ministry press briefings focused on "America". |
| 28 | +*Originally published as a featured blog post at IPZ/UZH.* |
| 29 | + |
| 30 | +### Overview |
| 31 | +From trade to human rights, the superpowers are battling on almost all topics since Trump. Through **sentimental analysis** of Chinese Foreign Ministry spokespersons‘ responses on U.S. topics from **2002 to 2022**, this project observes the changing dynamics of the world's most important bilateral relations. |
| 32 | + |
| 33 | +### Methodology |
| 34 | +- **Dataset**: Ministry of Foreign Affairs Press Conferences Corpus (2002-2022). |
| 35 | +- **Tools**: Analyzed in **R** using the `quanteda` and `zoo` packages. |
| 36 | +- **Sentiment Scoring**: Used the Bing dictionary (Liu & Hu, 2004) and the formula: $sentiment = log((positive + 0.5)/(negative + 0.5))$. |
| 37 | +- **Visualisation**: Interactive plots generated via `Plotly` and Word Clouds for key diplomatic crises. |
16 | 38 |
|
17 | | -### Key Methods: |
18 | | -- **Sentiment Analysis**: Tracking emotional tones across different diplomatic eras. |
19 | | -- **Data Visualization**: Created **Word Clouds** to highlight key terms during the Trade Conflict and North Korean Nuclear Crisis. |
20 | | -- **Impact**: Published as a featured blog post on the department's website. |
| 39 | +### Key Findings |
| 40 | +1. **The Era of Constructive Cooperation (2002-2016)**: Diplomatic language remained largely positive, peaking during events like the 2008 Beijing Olympics, despite occasional friction over trade and regional security. |
| 41 | +2. **The Shift to Strategic Competition (2017-2022)**: A sharp decline in sentiment following the 2018 Trade War and the COVID-19 pandemic. |
| 42 | +3. **The "Wolf Warrior" Turn**: Notable shifts in rhetoric style under different spokespersons (e.g., Zhao Lijian), reflecting a more confrontational diplomatic stance. |
| 43 | + |
| 44 | +> "The human language contains personal attitudes and sentiments. In the diplomatic field, these are often suppressed, but press conferences reveal genuine emotions through on-the-spot reactions." |
| 45 | +
|
| 46 | +--- |
| 47 | +*For the full interactive experience and detailed data charts, please visit the original blog post linked above.* |
0 commit comments