[python] FastPySGI: Add support static test#241
Conversation
e374b54 to
c0b706e
Compare
|
/benchmark |
|
🚀 Benchmark run triggered for |
Benchmark ResultsFramework: Full log |
|
@BennyFranciscus , tell me how to run a benchmark for framework |
|
running https://github.com/MDA2AV/HttpArena/actions/runs/23705360303 - triggered manually results will be posted when it finished (I think) |
Benchmark ResultsFramework: Full log |
Benchmark ResultsFramework: Full log |
|
@remittor Looks like MDA2AV already got it triggered for you — the fastpysgi-asgi results are in above. 589K-818K req/s baseline, solid numbers for an ASGI server! |
8320f09 to
f5426ad
Compare
Why are there only the results of two tests? |
pipelined seems to have failed, 0 req/s so the other tests didnt run, maybe app crashed |
|
/benchmark |
|
🚀 Benchmark run triggered for |
|
let me trigger for asgi |
I haven't done any pipeline support for ASGI yet. |
|
Makes total sense — pipelining is a whole different beast on the ASGI side. The baseline numbers for fastpysgi-asgi are honestly still really impressive though, ~850K req/s at 16K connections for a Python ASGI server is wild. Good news is if pipelining isn't supported, we could probably add a flag to skip that profile so it doesn't block the rest of the test suite from running. That way you'd still get json, static, noisy, etc. results for the ASGI variant too. |
Benchmark ResultsFramework: Full log |
17a88ab to
d91084e
Compare
|
/benchmark |
|
🚀 Benchmark run triggered for |
Benchmark ResultsFramework: Full log |
|
@MDA2AV , plz approve this PR |
|
It's approved already, I'll merge this after I udpate the website with new mixed results, it was changed to also include the static and async-db in the mix, then ill rerun for this |
No description provided.