Skip to content

Conversation

@thilobillerbeck
Copy link
Collaborator

Convert the values page into something that is more clear about how the projects governance is working.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 8, 2025

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 8, 2025

@thilobillerbeck thilobillerbeck marked this pull request as ready for review October 11, 2025 20:48
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Copy link
Member

@infinisil infinisil left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Made some suggestions, but looking great otherwise!

Copy link
Member

@djacu djacu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great! Left some comments on the suggestions

@nixos-discourse
Copy link

This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there:

https://discourse.nixos.org/t/sc-meeting-2025-10-15-17-05-utc/70966/1

thilobillerbeck and others added 4 commits October 21, 2025 21:03
Co-authored-by: Dan Baker <daniel.n.baker@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Silvan Mosberger <silvan.mosberger@tweag.io>
Co-authored-by: Silvan Mosberger <silvan.mosberger@tweag.io>
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Copy link
Member

@infinisil infinisil left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looking good other than a minor issue!

I'd also like to ping @NixOS/steering to let them know of this

@JulienMalka
Copy link
Member

I don't know exactly why, but right now the page shows the incorrect names for SC members.

Comment on lines +85 to +86
<b>Responsibilities:</b> Legal, financial and partnership decisions and
delegation
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The SC does have a say in partnerships, such as sponsorship relations.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@roberth I rephrased this in the latest commit to: "Technical and community decisions, delegation and guidance on partnership decisions". What do you think about that?

@thilobillerbeck
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I don't know exactly why, but right now the page shows the incorrect names for SC members.

This has been branched off before the sc teams page has been updated. Since the display of the SC members takes the data from the same source as the sc teams page it is simply using outdated data which will be no problem when main is either merged into this branch or this branch will at some point be merged into main. :)

thilobillerbeck and others added 4 commits November 27, 2025 18:14
Co-authored-by: Silvan Mosberger <silvan.mosberger@tweag.io>
Co-authored-by: Silvan Mosberger <silvan.mosberger@tweag.io>
Co-authored-by: Robert Hensing <roberth@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Robert Hensing <roberth@users.noreply.github.com>
thilobillerbeck and others added 6 commits November 27, 2025 18:16
Co-authored-by: Robert Hensing <roberth@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Robert Hensing <roberth@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Robert Hensing <roberth@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Robert Hensing <roberth@users.noreply.github.com>
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Copy link
Member

@cafkafk cafkafk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The commit stack is quite messy, I don't know what the norms are for the nixos-homepage, or whether or not you're mainly seeking validation of the content added, but if you're also asking for a technical review, cleaning it up to be tighter would make it much more reviewable.

@thilobillerbeck
Copy link
Collaborator Author

thilobillerbeck commented Dec 5, 2025

@cafkafk I don't know how much a cleaned up commit stack would help you since this is pretty much about the end result and its contents only. This might have been missed but we usually squash our commits at the end with a proper commit message. This is why I do not really care about keeping a clean commit history in these PRs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants