diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..723ef36
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+.idea
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/pull-requests.md b/pull-requests.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..3179afc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/pull-requests.md
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+# Pull requests (PR)
+
+## Aims
+
+  - Keep PRs small and/or easy for reviewers to understand.
+  - Keep PRs focused on one core issue.
+  - Get changes that might affect other features being developed onto
+    main in a timely fashion.
+  - Avoid blocking where one PR can’t be merged because it requires features that are being
+    developed on another branch that hasn’t been merged yet.
+  - Improve situational awareness of each other’s work and encourage early feedback.
+
+## Small features or changes: single PR
+
+Small features or changes should be proposed using a single PR, which details the
+problem being addressed or the enhancement made, what is being done and why. A good rule of thumb is
+that if the work for the PR has only taken a couple of sessions or days, then it’s best
+just to propose via a single PR.
+
+## Large features or changes: single PR
+
+Sometimes you might want to propose large changes that you have developed quickly,
+for example, using AI. In this case, it is fine and preferred to use a single PR. However,
+you should be considerate of the impact on reviewers. Please consider:
+
+  - Are your changes adequately explained in the PR description?
+  - Are the changes expected by the development team? If you are an external
+    contributor, consider raising an issue before the PR to consult maintainers.
+  - For AI-assisted contributions, a good guide is that the human effort involved in
+    opening the PR should exceed the expected effort of maintainers to review the PR.
+  - How else could you help reviewers digest the PR?
+
+***If the work is taking weeks, and the visibility of the changes you have in the 
+pipeline could be important for other developers, please use a
+[multiple PR](#large-features-or-changes-multiple-prs) approach.***
+
+## Large features or changes: multiple PRs
+
+Large features developed over multiple weeks should usually use multiple PRs. It
+makes it easier for reviewers to digest the changes, and improves visibility of what’s
+in the pipeline. A multiple PR approach typically takes the following form:
+
+  - Before starting coding, create an issue describing the proposed changes to provide
+    visibility to other developers and provide a place for early discussion on the
+    proposed changes.
+  - Propose your changes incrementally across multiple PRs, with a single PR chunk
+    containing roughly no more than a week of coding effort. Use your judgment and chunk
+    the work in a logical fashion that fits your circumstances. The main thing is to
+    avoid dumping large PRs on other developers when they could have been provided the
+    changes in incremental chunks.
+  - Each PR should reference the original issue, and the last PR should close the 
+    issue. 
+  - If the new code in a chunk isn’t fully complete, hide it behind a feature flag,
+    an if-statement that prevents it from running unless a flag explicitly allows it
+    to do so. Add your new flag to feature_flag.yaml with a default value of False.
+  - The last PR for a new feature, once it is fully tested, should remove all the
+    feature-flag if-statements and the feature flag from the YAML file. ***Note, more
+    docs on setting up feature flags to be added once the first one is implemented.***
+