From 456f536273a70d1edbe44e2dcc998a5ed0963949 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: kimagery <42256206+kimagery@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2026 17:34:35 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] Update java8-tutorial-translate.md
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

The original stream().sorted().count() does not perform sorting and just counts elements directly — it’s equivalent to stream().count(). This makes parallelStream().sorted().count() appear slower by comparison.
---
 docs/java/new-features/java8-tutorial-translate.md | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/docs/java/new-features/java8-tutorial-translate.md b/docs/java/new-features/java8-tutorial-translate.md
index 311825508b1..44833fd75b1 100644
--- a/docs/java/new-features/java8-tutorial-translate.md
+++ b/docs/java/new-features/java8-tutorial-translate.md
@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ for (int i = 0; i < max; i++) {
 ```java
 //串行排序
 long t0 = System.nanoTime();
-long count = values.stream().sorted().count();
+long count = Arrays.stream(list.stream().sorted().toArray()).count();
 System.out.println(count);
 
 long t1 = System.nanoTime();
@@ -612,7 +612,7 @@ sequential sort took: 709 ms//串行排序所用的时间
 //并行排序
 long t0 = System.nanoTime();
 
-long count = values.parallelStream().sorted().count();
+long count = Arrays.stream(list.parallelStream().sorted().toArray()).count();
 System.out.println(count);
 
 long t1 = System.nanoTime();