Internals revamp of apalis-amqp: Upstream possible?

[aumetra]

Hey!

First of all, again, thanks for Apalis. It's been a blast to use so far.
I am working on revamping some of the internals of apalis-amqp in a private fork using amqprs due to its better use strace profile, and cleaned up some of the internals (such as getting rid of pin-project, etc.).

Is this something you'd be generally open to merge into upstream? amqprs would mean that the crate would become Tokio-only though. Not sure if this is something you are alright with.

[geofmureithi]

Sure I am open to a PR

…

On Thu, 26 Feb 2026 at 03:02, ‍ ***@***.***> wrote: Hey! First of all, again, thanks for Apalis. It's been a blast to use so far. I am working on revamping some of the internals of apalis-amqp in a private fork using amqprs due to its better use strace profile, and cleaned up some of the internals (such as getting rid of pin-project, etc.). Is this something you'd be generally open to merge into upstream? amqprs would mean that the crate would become Tokio-only though. Not sure if this is something you are alright with. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#696>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AWXVRGTPLHSENHJD6VG3ANT4NYZZPAVCNFSM6AAAAACV74XT7OVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43ERDJONRXK43TNFXW4OZZGUZTMMBZGU> . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>