Skip to content

Consider switching to sortable for sorting tables #617

@jelly

Description

@jelly

jquery.tablesorter is no longer maintained, sortable looks like a more active alternative.

Main benefit is dropping 14 kB (tablesorter) + 30kB (jQuery) of JavaScript for 1kB of vanilla JavaScript

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions