You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
During our modernization workshop in Paris (see #466), one of the most frequent discussion points was the C++ standard version BGL should require. Modernization is intuitively at odds with C++14 😉
Some context worth knowing:
Boost.Graph is already C++14
A lot of API modernization can be done without bumping the minimum.
Some modernization changes would land cleaner on a newer standard
We don't yet have a clear enough picture of our users' constraint space to inform our discussion about a potential baseline bump. For example, it appeared that automotive industry users will be locked in C++17 for a while with MISRA.
Your answers will inform our discussion about a potential baseline bump.
We'd deeply appreciate it if you could take a moment to answer this simple poll. Thanks!
What's the oldest C++ standard your project needs BGL to keep supporting (i.e. the version past which a bump would break you or force you to pin a version).
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi Graphlings! 🚀
During our modernization workshop in Paris (see #466), one of the most frequent discussion points was the C++ standard version BGL should require. Modernization is intuitively at odds with C++14 😉
Some context worth knowing:
Your answers will inform our discussion about a potential baseline bump.
We'd deeply appreciate it if you could take a moment to answer this simple poll. Thanks!
4 votes ·
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions