The README currently lists the license as "MIT, Apache" with no further explanation. This is ambiguous and potentially a legal concern — it's unclear whether the project is dual-licensed under both MIT and Apache 2.0, or if one applies to a specific part of the codebase (e.g. MIT for the backend, Apache for the IoT layer).
The README currently lists the license as "MIT, Apache" with no further explanation. This is ambiguous and potentially a legal concern — it's unclear whether the project is dual-licensed under both MIT and Apache 2.0, or if one applies to a specific part of the codebase (e.g. MIT for the backend, Apache for the IoT layer).