in public search, licensees who are not eligible are marked "not eligible" in list view BE

[isabeleliassen]

Notes

Can't remember if this feature needs a backend, feel free to close if not needed

Questions

Assumptions

Estimate

Tasks

• TODO
• Automated tests
• API Docs
• Postman collection
• PR opened with labels / reviewers / assignee / linked-issue

Implementation Notes

[landonshumway-ia]

@isabeleliassen Is this the ticket where we discussed also showing discipline status? Showing just the eligibility would be fairly straightforward. The discipline status will depend on if we are ok to return the effective date and the lift date in the public response so that the frontend can determine if the license is still encumbered or not.

Assuming that we can safely return those two fields in the encumbrance data, that change would be a 1, if not, we will need to re-evaluate how we want to handle that so the frontend can determine if the license is encumbered or not.

EDIT: sorry, just saw the next ticket down that talks about discipline status. This ticket here is a 1.

[isabeleliassen]

I will double check that we can use start/end date info publicly but I believe that is fine.

I've also just realized that this doesn't account for people who are disciplined at the privilege level only and are still eligible to practice in other states. We will need to revisit to discuss how best to show eligibility/ineligibility in such cases. Rather than a single discipline/non discipline option, we may want to have an alert icon of some kind and the text "see details" or similar for licensees who have any discipline (whether on a license or privilege) and then still rely on the detail view to show discipline or no discipline for each.