Bug / Nuance - Styling for Documentation in "Rule" Description has different font

[luke-hill]

🤔 What's the problem you've observed?

The font for Rule descriptions (Not feature descriptions), features a css conflict and the font family is deleted

✨ Do you have a proposal for making it better?

Use the same one in the entire doc

📚 Any additional context?

Sample image showing the font family difference

Body font family

"Inter var",ui-sans-serif,system-ui,-apple-system,BlinkMacSystemFont,"Segoe UI",Roboto,"Helvetica Neue",Arial,"Noto Sans",sans-serif,"Apple Color Emoji","Segoe UI Emoji","Segoe UI Symbol","Noto Color Emoji"

Rule font family (Inherited above at pre and code styling)

ui-monospace,SFMono-Regular,Menlo,Monaco,Consolas,"Liberation Mono","Courier New",monospace

[davidjgoss]

Can you post the full feature file source?

There's no specific styling for Rule, but I suspect what's happened here is the indentation in the source file has meant the text is padded with spaces and is then interpreted by the Markdown parser as a code block.

[luke-hill]

Can you post the full feature file source?

There's no specific styling for Rule, but I suspect what's happened here is the indentation in the source file has meant the text is padded with spaces and is then interpreted by the Markdown parser as a code block.

I'll send you a copy in discord in the next day or so