-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Expand file tree
/
Copy pathch03.html
More file actions
920 lines (820 loc) · 38.5 KB
/
ch03.html
File metadata and controls
920 lines (820 loc) · 38.5 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE html><html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" lang="en">
<head>
<meta charset="utf-8"/>
<title>数据 + 设计</title>
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="theme/html/html.css"/>
<script src="js/retina.min.js" type="text/javascript"> </script>
<script src="js/jquery.min.js" type="text/javascript"> </script>
<script src="js/data-design.js" type="text/javascript"> </script>
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0"/>
</head>
<body data-type="book">
<span class="btn open">打开</span>
<div class="navbar">
<div class="title">
<span class="btn close">关闭</span>
<h1>数据 + 设计</h1>
<h2>对信息准备与可视化的简要介绍</h2>
</div>
<nav data-type="toc" id="idp97216">
<ol>
<li data-type="part">
<a href="titlepage01.html">简介</a>
<ol>
<li data-type="copyright-page">
<a href="copyright-page01.html">版权许可</a>
</li>
<li data-type="preface">
<a href="preface01.html">绪言</a>
</li>
<li data-type="foreword">
<a href="foreword01.html">序</a>
</li>
<li data-type="introduction">
<a href="introduction01.html">怎样使用本书</a>
</li>
</ol>
</li>
<li data-type="part">
<a href="part01.html">数据基础</a>
<ol>
<li data-type="chapter">
<a href="ch01.html">基本数据类型</a>
</li>
<li data-type="chapter">
<a href="ch02.html">关于数据聚合/统计</a>
</li>
</ol>
</li>
<li data-type="part">
<a href="part02.html">数据采集</a>
<ol>
<li data-type="chapter">
<a href="ch03.html">调查数据简介</a>
</li>
<li data-type="chapter">
<a href="ch04.html">调查问题类型</a>
</li>
<li data-type="chapter">
<a href="ch05.html">其他的数据采集方法</a>
</li>
<li data-type="chapter">
<a href="ch06.html">发现外部数据</a>
</li>
</ol>
</li>
<li data-type="part">
<a href="part03.html">让数据就绪</a>
<ol>
<li data-type="chapter">
<a href="ch07.html">数据准备</a>
</li>
<li data-type="chapter">
<a href="ch08.html">数据清理</a>
</li>
<li data-type="chapter">
<a href="ch09.html">数据校对种类</a>
</li>
<li data-type="chapter">
<a href="ch10.html">数据清理的能和不能</a>
</li>
<li data-type="chapter">
<a href="ch11.html">数据转换</a>
</li>
</ol>
</li>
<li data-type="part">
<a href="part04.html">数据可视化</a>
<ol>
<li data-type="chapter">
<a href="ch12.html">决定哪些以及多少数据用于呈现</a>
</li>
<li data-type="chapter">
<a href="ch13.html">图形化调查响应结果</a>
</li>
<li data-type="chapter">
<a href="ch14.html">解析信息图</a>
</li>
<li data-type="chapter">
<a href="ch15.html">色彩、字体、图标的重要性</a>
</li>
<li data-type="chapter">
<a href="ch16.html">打印 Vs. 网页，静态 Vs. 交互</a>
</li>
</ol>
</li>
<li data-type="part">
<a href="part05.html">不要做什么</a>
<ol>
<li data-type="chapter">
<a href="ch17.html">知觉欺骗</a>
</li>
<li data-type="chapter"><a href="ch18.html">常见可视化错误</a>
</li>
</ol>
</li>
<li data-type="part">
<a href="#">总结</a>
<ol>
<li data-type="chapter">
<a href="app01.html">资源</a>
</li>
<li data-type="chapter">
<a href="glossary01.html">术语表</a>
</li>
<li data-type="chapter">
<a href="acknowledgments01.html">贡献者/致谢</a>
</li>
</ol>
</li>
</ol>
</nav>
</div>
<section class="green" data-type="chapter" data-pdf-bookmark="Chapter 21. Intro to Survey Design" id="idp4959056">
<header>
<div class="icon"><img src="images/sections/03/survey.png"/></div>
<p>Chapter 3</p>
<p>第三章</p>
<h1>Intro to Survey Design</h1>
<h1>调查问卷设计简介</h1>
<p data-type="author">By Ginette Law</p>
<p data-type="author">原作者：Ginette Law</p>
</header>
<section data-type="sect1" id="idp4498176">
<p>Most people think conducting a survey is as simple as writing a bunch of questions and asking people to answer them. Easy, right? Well, sort of: it’s a little more complicated than that if you want to collect the best data possible. Don’t worry, though: we’re about to go over some key elements of survey design, starting with the purpose of your survey.</p>
<p>大多数人认为进行问卷调查就像搞一堆问题让人们来回答那么简单。你说简单不？在某种程度上来说的确是的，但如果你想得到最好的数据，就会更复杂了。不过不需要担心，我们将在这里讲一些设计调查问卷的关键要素，从调查问卷的目的开始讲起。</p>
<h2>Purpose of a Survey</h2>
<h2>调查问卷的目的</h2>
<p>The first step in designing a good survey is to identify its purpose <em>before</em> you create it. A good survey collects accurate and verifiable data that allow you to make concrete claims. This is easier to do if you have a clear purpose to guide you when deciding what information you want to collect your respondents.</p>
<p>设计一个好的问卷调查的第一步是在你创建它<em>之前</em>就确认它的目的是什么。好的问卷调查搜集的是准确并且可被验证的数据，它们能让你做出具体的声明。如果你在决定从调查对象中搜集什么样的信息时就已经有了一个清晰的目的，那么这个就更容易做到了。</p>
<p>A survey generally helps you do one or more of the following:</p>
<p>调查问卷通常帮助你做以下的事情中的一个或多个：</p>
<ul>
<li>describe something;</li>
<li>describe how things are related;</li>
<li>explain a relationship; or</li>
<li>influence something</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>描述某事；</li>
<li>描述事物间的联系；</li>
<li>解释一个关系；或</li>
<li>影响某事</li>
</ul>
<p>So how do you come up with a nice, well-defined purpose for your survey? Try asking yourself the following questions:</p>
<p>那么到底该如何给你的调查问卷想出一个不错的，定义明确的目的呢？你可以试着问自己如下的问题：</p>
<ul>
<li>What are you trying to achieve with your survey?</li>
<li>What, precisely, do you want to know?</li>
<li>Why is this important to know?</li>
<li>Is there other information that could be useful? Why?</li>
<li>Is conducting a survey the right method for the type of data you’re collecting?</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>你通过这个调查问卷想得到什么？</li>
<li>更确切地说，你到底想知道些什么？</li>
<li>为什么知道它是很重要的事？</li>
<li>有没有什么其它信息也可能有用？为什么？</li>
<li>对你想要搜集的数据而言，做一个调查问卷是正确的获得方式么？</li>
</ul>
<p>To see this process in action, let’s say you’re a media tycoon trying to increase your profits from television subscribers, so you’re interested in the potential returns from expanding to an internet market. You decide the main question and purpose of your survey are:</p>
<p>为了看看这个过程是如何操作的，假设你是个正想要增加电视订阅收益的媒体大亨。你对扩展到互联网市场的潜在收益感兴趣。你确立了你的调查问卷的主要问题和目的是：</p>
<table class="custom question-and-answer">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Research Question</th>
<th>Purpose</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><em>What percentage of television viewers watch their favorite television shows online?</em></td>
<td><strong>Describe a variable</strong>
<p>The percentage of people who watch television programs online.</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table class="custom question-and-answer">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>调研问题</th>
<th>目的</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><em>在网上看自己最喜欢的电视剧的人的比例是多少？</em></td>
<td><strong>描述一个变量</strong>
<p>在网上看电视节目的人的比例。</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>After thinking about it, you realize that it would be helpful to get more details, so you ask yourself some of those questions we just suggested:</p>
<p>思考了一会儿之后，你意识到如果能得到更多细节将会更有帮助，所以你问了自己刚刚我们建议你问的问题：</p>
<table class="custom question-and-answer">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Question</th>
<th>Answer</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><em>What are you trying to achieve with your survey?</em></td>
<td>To evaluate the profit potential of the internet market.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><em>What do you want to know precisely? </em></td>
<td>How many people currently or would like to be able to stream shows online.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><em>Why is this important to know?</em></td>
<td>It will help determine where we can improve our online service and whether it’s worth the investment.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><em>Is there other information that could be useful? Why?</em></td>
<td>Which age group is more likely to watch TV online.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><em>Is conducting a survey the right method for the type of data you’re collecting?</em></td>
<td>Yes.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table class="custom question-and-answer">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>问题</th>
<th>答案</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><em>你通过这个调查问卷想得到什么？</em></td>
<td>来估算互联网市场的潜在收益。</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><em>更确切地说，你到底想知道些什么？ </em></td>
<td>目前或者将来有多少人会想要在网上看电视。</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><em>为什么知道它是很重要的事？</em></td>
<td>它可以帮助我们判定我们需要在网上服务的哪些方面进行改进以及这个投资是否值得。</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><em>有没有什么其它信息也可能有用？为什么？</em></td>
<td>哪个年龄层更倾向于在网上看电视。</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><em>针对你想要搜集的数据而言，做一个调查问卷是正确的获得方式么？</em></td>
<td>是的。</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Based on your answers to these questions, you expand the scope of your survey slightly:</p>
<p>根据你对这些问题的回答，你把稍微扩大了一些该调查问卷的范围：</p>
<table class="custom question-and-answer">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Research Question</th>
<th>Purpose</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><em>How can we maximize profits from online viewership?</em></td>
<td><strong>Influence something:</strong>
<p>Find out what needs to be done to improve our online service.</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><em>Do younger television users tend to stream more television programs online than older viewers?</em></td>
<td><strong>Describe how things are related:</strong>
<p>Describe how a viewer’s age is related to how much TV he or she watches online.</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><em>If one group watches more programs online, why? </em></td>
<td><strong>Explain a relationship:</strong>
<p>Explain why one age group prefers watching TV online more than another age group does.</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table class="custom question-and-answer">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>调研问题</th>
<th>目的</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><em>我们如何从网上观众身上得到最大化的收益？</em></td>
<td><strong>影响某事：</strong>
<p>找出要想改进我们的网上服务我们需要做些什么。</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><em>是否年轻的观众比年长的观众更倾向于更多地在网上看电视剧？</em></td>
<td><strong>描述事物间的联系；</strong>
<p>描述观众的年龄到底和他（她）在网上看多少电视有什么关系。</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><em>如果其中一个年龄组在网上看更多的电视的话，是为什么呢？ </em></td>
<td><strong>解释一个关系：</strong>
<p>解释为何一个年龄组比另一个年龄组更喜欢在网上看电视。</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Now you have a nice set of clearly-defined questions that your survey should address. The next step is to choose the best type of survey to help you expand your business.</p>
<p>现在你的调查问卷有了一组很好的，定义明确的问题。下一步就是选择哪种调查问卷对你的生意最有帮助了。</p>
<div data-type="warning">
<p>Data and numbers can be very powerful, but sometimes people conduct surveys for the wrong reasons. You will miss the opportunity to gain meaningful insight with your survey if:</p>
<p>数据和数字都是很有力的，但有些时候人们做调查问卷的初衷就是错误的。如果你做调查问卷的目的是如下几种，那么你就错失了获得有意义的了解事实的机会：</p>
<ul>
<li>You don’t really care about the results; you just want to show people you’ve got numbers.</li>
<li>You misuse the data collected.</li>
<li>You are more concerned by how people will receive your findings than you are with having reliable results.</li>
<li>You have already determined what the results “should” be.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>你并不在乎结果，你只想告诉别人你有数据。</li>
<li>你滥用得到的数据。</li>
<li>相比得到可靠的结果来说，你更在乎别人对你的发现的看法。</li>
<li>你在心中已经决定了结果应该是什么样子的。</li>
</ul>
<p>Remember, we do research to gain insight and to test hypotheses. That means it’s important to try and collect the most accurate and representative data possible and not just the data that support your own preconceived ideas and biases.</p>
<p>请记住，我们做调研是为了获得进一步的了解，是为了检验猜测。这意味着尝试去搜集最准确和最有代表性的数据，而不仅仅是能支持你自己预想的看法和偏见，是件很重要的事情。</p>
</div>
<h2>Types of Surveys</h2>
<h2>调查问卷的类型</h2>
<p>Now that you’ve identified the purpose of your survey, you can use this to help you choose a type of survey. When it comes to choosing a survey type, the first big decision you’ll have to make is <em>how</em> you want to distribute your survey to respondents. Surveys can be self-administered or administered.</p>
<p>既然你已经确立了调查问卷的目的，你可以利用它来帮助你选择调查问卷的类型。在选择调查问卷类型这个问题上，你需要作出的第一个重要的决定就是你想用<em>何种方式</em>把它发给你的调查对象。调查问卷可以是自填式的，也可以是代填式的。</p>
<h2>Self-Administered and Administered Surveys</h2>
<h2>自填式和代填式调查问卷</h2>
<p>Self-administered simply means that respondents fill out a questionnaire by themselves, whereas administered means that an interviewer asks the questions. Each of these methods has advantages and disadvantages, summarized below.</p>
<p>自填式，顾名思义就是调查对象自己来填写调查问卷，而代填式就是由访谈员来问他们问题。下面总结下这两者各自的优缺点。</p>
<p><b>Self-Administered Surveys</b></p>
<p><b>自填式调查问卷</b></p>
<table class="custom good-and-bad">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Pros</th>
<th>Cons</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<ul>
<li>Good for limited budgets</li>
<li>Large geographic reach</li>
<li>Respondents can answer when convenient and at their own pace</li>
</ul>
</td>
<td>
<ul>
<li>More difficult to distribute to populations with limited literacy</li>
<li>Risk of respondents misinterpreting questions</li>
<li>Risk of lower completion rate</li>
<li>Requires extra effort to verify that the respondent was actually the person to whom the survey was addressed</li>
</ul>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table class="custom good-and-bad">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>优点</th>
<th>缺点</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<ul>
<li>适合有限的预算</li>
<li>更宽广的地理范围</li>
<li>调查对象可以在自己方便的时候，按照自己的节奏来回答问题</li>
</ul>
</td>
<td>
<ul>
<li>难以在文化水平有限的人群中散发</li>
<li>有调查对象误解题意的风险</li>
<li>有低完成率的风险</li>
<li>需要额外花精力来验证答题人和调查问卷原本的调查对象确实是同一人</li>
</ul>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><b>Administered Surveys</b></p>
<p><b>代填式调查问卷</b></p>
<table class="custom good-and-bad">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Pros</th>
<th>Cons</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<ul>
<li>Tighter quality control</li>
<li>Interviewers can clarify questions for respondents</li>
<li>Can collect richer and more in-depth information</li>
<li>Easier to reach specific or marginalized populations (e.g., the elderly or the homeless)</li>
</ul>
</td>
<td>
<ul>
<li>Can be expensive</li>
<li>Can be time consuming</li>
<li>Risk of interviewer effect (e.g., an interviewer’s interpretation of a question could bias some of the results)</li>
</ul>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table class="custom good-and-bad">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>优点</th>
<th>缺点</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<ul>
<li>更牢固的质量控制</li>
<li>访谈员可以为调查对象澄清题意</li>
<li>能够采集到更丰富和更深入的信息</li>
<li>更容易触及到特定的或者边缘化的人群（如老年人和流浪汉）</li>
</ul>
</td>
<td>
<ul>
<li>可能会很贵</li>
<li>可能会很耗时</li>
<li>访谈员效应风险（如，访谈员自己对问题的理解可能对部分结果造成影响）</li>
</ul>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>The table above mentions the interviewer effect. This is a phenomenon whereby the interviewers themselves influence the responses. This could happen because of the way they ask questions or phrase explanations, or because of another social factor altogether. For example, maybe the interviewer is incredibly good-looking and the respondent unintentionally gives answers that are biased towards impressing the interviewer!</p>
<p>上表提到了访谈员效应。这是一种访谈员自身对于受访结果造成影响的现象。他们问问题的方式，对于解释的叙述方法，或其他社会因素都可能造成这种现象。例如，也许访谈员长得特别好看导致受访者不自觉地给出了偏向于给访谈员留下好印象的答案。 </p>
<p>Self-administered and administered surveys are each associated with certain types of surveys, as shown below:</p>
<p>自填式和代填式调查问卷各自关联的特定调查问卷类型如下：</p>
<figure><img alt="Venn diagram of administered vs. non-administered surveys" src="images/sections/03/ch04-01-venn-survey-types.png"/></figure>
<h2>Types of Self-Administered Surveys</h2>
<h2>自填式调查问卷的类型</h2>
<h3>Web and Email Surveys</h3>
<h3>在线及电子邮件式调查问卷</h3>
<p>One of the easiest and quickest ways you can conduct a survey is online. You can either have people fill out questionnaires directly on a website or send them a questionnaire via e-mail. There are even survey sites that let you design questionnaire forms, collect data, and analyze responses in real-time at an affordable rate. You’ll find links to a few of these sites in the <a href="app01.html">resources section</a>.</p>
<p>做起来最简便快捷的问卷调查方法之一就是在线式的。你可以让调查对象直接在网站上填写问卷或者通过电子邮件将问卷发送给他们。甚至还有专门的能让你在上面设计问卷表格，实时收集数据并且分析回答的网站，而且价格也可以承受。你可以在<a href="app01.html">相关资源部分</a>中找到几个这样网站的链接.</p>
<div data-type="warning">
<p>Don’t forget to read the Privacy Policies and Terms of Use before signing up though—especially if you’re dealing with sensitive data—because these services are often subject to the laws of the countries in which they’re based.</p>
<p>在注册前别忘了阅读相应网站的隐私政策和服务条款，尤其当你需要处理敏感数据时。因为这些服务通常要服从它们所在国家的法律。</p>
</div>
<p>The downside to all of this convenience is that only regular internet or computer users are likely to fill out your survey.</p>
<p>这些便利包含的缺点就是只有常上网和用电脑的人才可能填写你的调查问卷。</p>
<h3>Web and email</h3>
<h3>在线及电子邮件问卷</h3>
<table class="custom good-and-bad">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Pros</th>
<th>Cons</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<ul>
<li>Fairly fast results</li>
<li>Integrated support tools for images, sounds, video</li>
<li>Relatively cheap</li>
</ul>
</td>
<td>
<ul>
<li>Limited to people who have internet access</li>
<li>Respondents can be a self-selected group of regular computer-users</li>
</ul>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table class="custom good-and-bad">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>优点</th>
<th>缺点</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<ul>
<li>相对快速地得到结果</li>
<li>整合了支持图像，声音和视频的工具</li>
<li>相对便宜</li>
</ul>
</td>
<td>
<ul>
<li>局限于能上网的人群</li>
<li>调查对象可以是自选的普通计算机用户</li>
</ul>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Web</h3>
<h3>在线</h3>
<table class="custom good-and-bad">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Pros</th>
<th>Cons</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<ul>
<li>Can invite participants through social media</li>
<li>Can use survey sites</li>
</ul>
</td>
<td>
<ul>
<li>Survey sites are subject to the laws of the countries in which they’re based</li>
</ul>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table class="custom good-and-bad">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>优点</th>
<th>缺点</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<ul>
<li>可以通过社交网络来邀请参与者</li>
<li>可以使用调查问卷网站</li>
</ul>
</td>
<td>
<ul>
<li>调查问卷网站要服从它们所在国家的法律</li>
</ul>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Email</h3>
<h3>电子邮件</h3>
<table class="custom good-and-bad">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Pros</th>
<th>Cons</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<ul>
<li>Easier to survey a specific group</li>
</ul>
</td>
<td>
<ul>
<li>Need email addresses in order to distribute survey</li>
</ul>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table class="custom good-and-bad">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>优点</th>
<th>缺点</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<ul>
<li>更容易调查一个特定的人群</li>
</ul>
</td>
<td>
<ul>
<li>需要电子邮件地址才能散发调查问卷</li>
</ul>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Mail Surveys</h3>
<h3>邮寄式问卷</h3>
<p>邮寄式问卷和电子邮件式问卷很类似，不过就是通过邮寄来发送纸质的问卷而已。邮寄能接触到网民以外的人群，但是因为你需要付打印、纸、信封和邮票的钱，所以这种方法更贵一些。也许最后你得到的回复率也会低一些，因为有些人不愿意邮寄任何东西，而不仅仅是你的调查问卷。在调查问卷里附上一个已经写好回邮地址并且贴上邮票的信封经常可以提高回复率，不过会再一次提高你的花费。</p>
<p>Mail surveys are much like email surveys except that you’re sending a paper version of the questionnaire by mail. They aren’t limited to the population of internet users, but they can be more expensive because you have to pay for printing, paper, envelopes, and postage. You may also end up with a lower response rate because some people think it’s a pain to mail anything, not just your survey. Including a pre-addressed, stamped envelope with the survey will often improve your overall response rate, but will, again, increase the overall cost to you.</p>
<h3>Mail</h3>
<h3>邮寄</h3>
<table class="custom good-and-bad">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Pros</th>
<th>Cons</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<ul>
<li>Open to a wider population</li>
</ul>
</td>
<td>
<ul>
<li>More expensive</li>
<li>Lower response rate</li>
</ul>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table class="custom good-and-bad">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>优点</th>
<th>缺点</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<ul>
<li>向更广阔的人群开放</li>
</ul>
</td>
<td>
<ul>
<li>更贵</li>
<li>更低的回复率</li>
</ul>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h2>Types of Administered Surveys</h2>
<h2>代填式调查问卷</h2>
<h3>Phone Surveys</h3>
<h3>电话问卷</h3>
<p>Compared to online surveys, phone surveys may take less time for you to collect all the data you need because respondents answer questions immediately. However, if you need to complete a certain number of surveys and most people hang up on you, it might longer to collect data by phone!</p>
<p>和在线问卷相比，也许电话问卷在搜集需要的数据上面花的时间要少一些，因为调查对象是立刻就给出回答的。但是，如果你需要完成指定数目的调查问卷而大部分人都挂你的电话的话，也许用电话来搜集数据反而花的时间更多！</p>
<p>It helps if questions are short and clear so that respondents can easily understand them over the phone. Try also to not take more than 15 to 20 minutes of your respondents’ time (both to be respectful of their time and to avoid losing their attention).</p>
<p>如果问题都简单明了，调查对象能轻松地在电话那头理解它们的话，是有帮助的。同时试着把占用调查对象的时间控制在15到20分钟以内（为了尊重他们的时间并且为了避免失去他们的注意力）</p>
<p>Another thing to keep in mind is that the interviewer and the respondent can’t see each other. This can be both good and bad: good because it lessens the interviewer effect but bad because both parties may miss non-verbal cues.</p>
<p>另外一件需要注意的事情是访谈员和受访者是看不见彼此的。这可以是好事也可以是坏事：好是因为这样减少了访谈员效应，不好是因为双方可能会遗漏掉对话中的非语言暗示。</p>
<table class="custom good-and-bad">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Pros</th>
<th>Cons</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<ul>
<li>Relatively fast results</li>
<li>Higher quality control because trained interviewers administer the survey</li>
</ul>
</td>
<td>
<ul>
<li>Can be more expensive</li>
<li>Can’t use images or video when asking questions</li>
<li>Need a list of reliable phone numbers</li>
</ul>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table class="custom good-and-bad">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>优点</th>
<th>缺点</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<ul>
<li>相对快速地得到结果</li>
<li>更高的质量控制，因为有训练有素的访谈员来掌控调查</li>
</ul>
</td>
<td>
<ul>
<li>可能会更贵</li>
<li>问问题时不能利用上图片和视频</li>
<li>需要可靠的电话号码列表</li>
</ul>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Face-to-Face Surveys</h3>
<h3>访问问卷</h3>
<p>Unlike phone surveys, face-to-face surveys allow the interviewer and the respondent to see each other’s facial expressions and body language. This can be helpful because the additional physical cues can help the interviewer and the respondent understand better understand each other; however, it can also lead to the respondent being further influenced by the interviewer’s behavior and appearance.</p>
<p>和电话调查不同，访问问卷中访谈员和受访者可以看见彼此的面部表情和肢体语言。这个也许是有用的，因为额外的身体暗示能帮助访谈员和受访者更好地理解彼此。但是，这也能导致受访者更能被访谈员的行为和外貌而影响。</p>
<p>Face-to-face surveys are limited geographically if interviewers and respondents have to meet in person. If they don’t have to meet in person, the surveys can be conducted online using video conferencing software such as <a href="http://www.skype.com/">Skype</a> or <a href="https://www.google.com/hangouts/">Google Hangouts</a>.</p>
<p>如果访谈员和受访者必须亲自见面的话，访问问卷法就收到了地理位置的限制。如果他们不需要亲自见面的话，问卷调查可以通过在线视频会议软件来进行，比如<a href="http://www.skype.com/">Skype</a> 或者 <a href="https://www.google.com/hangouts/">Google Hangouts</a>.</p>
<table class="custom good-and-bad">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Pros</th>
<th>Cons</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<ul>
<li>Can collect more in-depth information</li>
<li>Good for specific or hard-to-reach populations</li>
<li>Better for long surveys</li>
</ul>
</td>
<td>
<ul>
<li>Can be more expensive</li>
<li>May have a stronger interviewer effect</li>
<li>Can take longer to train interviewers and to complete enough surveys</li>
</ul>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table class="custom good-and-bad">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>优点</th>
<th>缺点</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<ul>
<li>可以搜集到更深入的信息</li>
<li>适合特定的或者是难以接触到的人群</li>
<li>适合长度较长的调查问卷</li>
</ul>
</td>
<td>
<ul>
<li>可能会更贵</li>
<li>可能会有更强的访谈员效应</li>
<li>训练访谈员以及完成足够数量的问卷都可能要花更长时间</li>
</ul>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h2>Handouts</h2>
<h2>传单</h2>
<p>So far, we’ve talked about self-administered and administered surveys, but one of the most frequently-encountered type of survey is actually a combination of these. Say you want to hand out paper surveys and have people complete and return them immediately. The survey itself is self-administered, but since you have a trained person there who is available to answer questions, it also has features of an administered survey.</p>
<p>到目前为止，我们探讨了代填式和自填式调查问卷，但是最常见的问卷调查法之一其实是这两者的结合体。比如你分发纸质问卷然后让大家填好后立刻交还给你。这个调查问卷本事是自填式的，但因为有你们的受过训练的，能立刻回答他们疑问的人员在场，这个问卷调查就也拥有了代填式问卷的一些属性。</p>
<p>For this reason, handouts can be a good option if you have a limited budget but want to make sure you have someone available when the survey is completed to clarify any questions your respondents might have.</p>
<p>因为这一点，当你预算有限但又想在调查对象填表时有相关人员在场澄清他们的疑问的时候，传单式问卷可以是一个好的选择。</p>
<p>One of the disadvantages of handouts is that people may be rushed to complete the survey if you are catching them in passing, which can affect the quality of your data. You will also be limited to the population that is physically present in the location where you are giving the survey. This may not be an issue if you are targeting a specific group, such as college students, shoppers at a particular store, or residents of a certain region. If you’re looking for a more general audience, however, you may consider handing the survey out in several different locations to reach a more diverse audience.</p>
<p>传单式问卷的一个缺点是，如果你是在路上把他们拦下来填表的话，他们可能填地时候很匆忙。另外，你也会受到发放传单的地点能出现的人群的限制。如果你针对的是特定人群，比如大学生、某个商店的顾客、某个地区的居民等，那这不算是什么问题。然而如果你想要更普遍的对象的话，可以考虑在几个不同的地点散发传单，以便接触到更多样化的人群。</p>
<h2>Choosing a Survey Type</h2>
<h2>选择调查问卷的类型</h2>
<p>Whew! That is a lot of information so far. As you can see, there are many types of surveys, each with its own pros and cons. With so many factors to consider, how do you decide which one to choose? Let’s walk through a few scenarios of choosing a survey type. Remember, you’re a media tycoon trying to expand your media empire.</p>
<p>嚯！到这儿我们可讲了不少东西。你也看见了，调查问卷的种类很多，各自都有优缺点。既然有这么多需要考虑的因素，那该如何选择到底用哪一种呢？我们来看几个不同场景下问卷类型的选择吧。记住，你是一个想要扩张疆土的媒体大亨。</p>
<p>Let’s say you want to evaluate the potential of the internet market. If you’re only interested in the online viewing habits of internet users, then a web or email survey cheaply and conveniently targets the group you’re interested in. On the other hand, if you want to know how much of the general television viewing audience watches shows online, but you don’t want to spend the time or the money to train interviewers, then a mail survey is a better option.</p>
<p>假设你想要评估互联网市场的潜力。如果你只对网民在网上看电视的习惯感兴趣，那么在线或电子邮件式调查问卷可以很便宜且方便地针对你感兴趣的人群。从另外一个方面讲，如果你想知道普通电视观众有多少时候是在网上看电视的，但又不想花时间和精力训练访谈员，那么邮寄式调查问卷是一个更好的选择。</p>
<p>But wait a minute: you’re a media tycoon! You have lots of money <em>and</em> you’re a total data geek. You want to collect more in-depth information like:</p>
<p>稍等一下哈，你是个媒体大亨！你有的是钱，<em>同时</em> 你是个彻头彻尾的极客。你想搜集像如下更有深度的信息：</p>
<ul>
<li>How do families watch television programs in their homes?</li>
<li>Which family members tend to watch TV online?</li>
<li>What type of television program does each family member like to watch?</li>
<li>Do they watch programs together?</li>
<li>If so, what types of programs do they watch together? Do they ever fight about what to watch?</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>老百姓在家看电视都有些什么习惯？</li>
<li>家中哪些人倾向于在线看电视？</li>
<li>家里每个人都喜欢看什么类型的电视节目？</li>
<li>他们一起看同一个节目么？</li>
<li>如果是的话，他们一起看什么种类的节目？他们会因为看什么电视节目而争执么？</li>
</ul>
<p>In this case, a face-to-face survey is a great option because you can interview all the members of a household at the same time and collect higher quality data about the dynamics of television viewing in families.</p>
<p>如果是这样的话，访问问卷就是很好的选择了。因为你可以同时访问家中全部成员，并且搜集到有关家庭看电视的动态的高质量数据。</p>
<p>Now let’s say you’ve analyzed the data and the numbers look promising, so you decide to create a new online viewing experience for your users. You want to emphasize how great and cutting-edge your new service is by creating a catchy name and logo for it. If you want to see what people think about different logos, then phone surveys won’t be helpful. On the other hand, if you want to see what people think about different names and slogans, then phone surveys are fine. If your new service is specifically targeting a younger audience of avid internet users, then you can avoid the extra cost of phone surveys and use an online survey instead.</p>
<p>假设你已经分析了或得到的数据，并且发现数据看来很有前景，所以你决定给你的观众们创造一个新的在线观看体验。你想通过创造一个朗朗上口的名字和图标来强调你的新服务有多伟大有多先进。如果你想知道大家对不同图标的看法的话，电话调查问卷不会有帮助的。从另一个方面来说，如果你想知道大家对不同的名字和标语的看法，那么电话调查也足够了。如果你的新服务是特别针对年轻些的喜欢上网的观众的话，你可以通过用在线调查来避免电话调查的额外费用。</p>
<p>If you have the time and resources to do so, you can also consider using more than one type of survey. For example, you may want to do an online and phone version of the same survey to increase response rates and improve your sample in both size and diversity. Or you may start by doing an online survey and then conduct a face-to-face survey afterwards to gain more insight from your initial results.</p>
<p>如果你有足够的时间和资源的话，你也可以考虑使用不止一种调查问卷方式。比如，你可以用在线和电话两种方式来做同一份调查问卷。这样可以增加回复率，还能提高样本的数目和多样性。或者你可以从做在线问卷开始，然后再进行访问问卷，以增加对刚开始得到的结果的认知。</p>
<p>We hope these scenarios show you that choosing a survey type isn’t a one-size-fits-all process. There isn’t a nice and tidy formula that you can use to pick the perfect survey. Instead, it’s up to your good judgment to balance the resources you have with the goals you’re trying to achieve.</p>
<p>我们希望这些情景案例让你知道，选择调查问卷类型的过程不是一成不变的。不存在简单优美的公式能让你来选择完美的调查问卷。反而，这一切都取决于好的判断力来平衡手中的资源和想要达到的目的。</p>
</section>
</section>
<div class="navigation">
<ul>
<li id="next_page"><a href="ch04.html">Next</a></li>
<li id="previous_page"><a href="part02.html">Previous</a></li>
</ul>
</div>
<script>
var _hmt = _hmt || [];
(function() {
var hm = document.createElement("script");
hm.src = "//hm.baidu.com/hm.js?27111432badf47d1f6260dcd3c815289";
var s = document.getElementsByTagName("script")[0];
s.parentNode.insertBefore(hm, s);
})();
</script>
</body>
</html>