diff --git a/SECURITY.md b/SECURITY.md
index 034e848..2eae04e 100644
--- a/SECURITY.md
+++ b/SECURITY.md
@@ -1,21 +1,115 @@
# Security Policy
+## 🔒 Security Assessment
+
+**Latest Assessment Date:** January 29, 2026
+**Current Security Status:** 🔴 **HIGH RISK - CRITICAL VULNERABILITIES PRESENT**
+
+### Quick Links
+
+- 📊 [Security Dashboard](./SECURITY_DASHBOARD.txt) - Visual overview of security status
+- 📋 [Executive Summary](./SECURITY_SUMMARY.md) - Quick reference for key findings
+- 📄 [Full Security Report](./SECURITY_ASSESSMENT_REPORT.md) - Comprehensive security analysis
+
+### Current Status
+
+⚠️ **WARNING:** This application contains critical security vulnerabilities and should **NOT** be deployed to production until all critical and high severity issues are resolved.
+
+**Vulnerability Summary:**
+- 🔴 **CRITICAL:** 3 issues
+- 🔴 **HIGH:** 5 issues
+- 🟡 **MEDIUM:** 4 issues
+- 🟢 **LOW:** 3 issues
+
+**Top Critical Issues:**
+1. Hardcoded database credentials
+2. Exposed Azure Storage key
+3. Vulnerable dependencies with known CVEs
+
+See the [Security Summary](./SECURITY_SUMMARY.md) for immediate action items.
+
+---
+
## Supported Versions
-Use this section to tell people about which versions of your project are
-currently being supported with security updates.
+This project is currently in demonstration/development phase. Security updates will be applied to the main branch.
-| Version | Supported |
-| ------- | ------------------ |
-| 5.1.x | :white_check_mark: |
-| 5.0.x | :x: |
-| 4.0.x | :white_check_mark: |
-| < 4.0 | :x: |
+| Version | Supported | Notes |
+| ------- | ------------------ | ----- |
+| main | :white_check_mark: | Active development |
+| < 1.0 | :x: | Demo/PoC versions |
+
+---
## Reporting a Vulnerability
-Use this section to tell people how to report a vulnerability.
+We take the security of this project seriously. If you discover a security vulnerability, please follow these steps:
+
+### How to Report
+
+1. **DO NOT** open a public GitHub issue for security vulnerabilities
+2. Email security reports to: [devopsabcs-security@example.com]
+3. Include the following information:
+ - Description of the vulnerability
+ - Steps to reproduce
+ - Potential impact
+ - Suggested fix (if available)
+
+### What to Expect
+
+- **Initial Response:** Within 48 hours
+- **Status Updates:** Every 5 business days
+- **Resolution Timeline:**
+ - Critical: 48-72 hours
+ - High: 7 days
+ - Medium: 30 days
+ - Low: 90 days
+
+### Our Commitment
+
+- We will acknowledge your report within 48 hours
+- We will provide regular updates on our progress
+- We will credit you for responsible disclosure (unless you prefer to remain anonymous)
+- We will notify you when the vulnerability is fixed
+
+---
+
+## Security Best Practices for Contributors
+
+When contributing to this project:
+
+1. **Never commit secrets** - Use Azure Key Vault or environment variables
+2. **Validate all inputs** - Implement proper input validation and sanitization
+3. **Use parameterized queries** - Prevent SQL injection
+4. **Update dependencies** - Keep all packages up to date
+5. **Follow OWASP guidelines** - Implement OWASP Top 10 recommendations
+6. **Run security scans** - Use GitHub Advanced Security features
+7. **Enable secret scanning** - Configure push protection
+8. **Review code** - Perform security-focused code reviews
+
+---
+
+## GitHub Advanced Security
+
+This repository uses GitHub Advanced Security features:
+
+- ✅ **Secret Scanning:** Detects secrets committed to the repository
+- ✅ **Code Scanning (CodeQL):** Identifies security vulnerabilities in code
+- ✅ **Dependabot:** Monitors dependencies for known vulnerabilities
+- ✅ **Dependency Review:** Reviews security impact of dependency changes
+
+Please ensure all security alerts are addressed before merging PRs.
+
+---
+
+## Additional Resources
+
+- [OWASP Top 10](https://owasp.org/www-project-top-ten/)
+- [ASP.NET Core Security Best Practices](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/security/)
+- [Azure Security Best Practices](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/security/)
+- [GitHub Advanced Security Docs](https://docs.github.com/en/code-security)
+
+---
-Tell them where to go, how often they can expect to get an update on a
-reported vulnerability, what to expect if the vulnerability is accepted or
-declined, etc.
+**Last Updated:** January 29, 2026
+**Next Security Review:** After critical vulnerabilities are remediated
diff --git a/SECURITY_ASSESSMENT_REPORT.md b/SECURITY_ASSESSMENT_REPORT.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6edb458
--- /dev/null
+++ b/SECURITY_ASSESSMENT_REPORT.md
@@ -0,0 +1,925 @@
+# Security Assessment Report
+## ASP.NET Core Web Application - webapp01
+
+**Assessment Date:** January 29, 2026
+**Application:** webapp01 (.NET 9.0 ASP.NET Core Razor Pages)
+**Repository:** devopsabcs-engineering/gh-advsec-devsecops
+**Assessed By:** Security Agent - GitHub Copilot
+
+---
+
+## Executive Summary
+
+This security assessment identified **CRITICAL** security vulnerabilities in the webapp01 ASP.NET Core application. The application contains multiple high-severity issues including hardcoded credentials, vulnerable dependencies with known CVEs, command injection risks, Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerabilities, and insufficient input validation.
+
+### Overall Security Posture: **HIGH RISK** ⚠️
+
+| Severity | Count | Status |
+|----------|-------|--------|
+| **CRITICAL** | 3 | 🔴 Requires Immediate Action |
+| **HIGH** | 5 | 🔴 Urgent |
+| **MEDIUM** | 4 | 🟡 Important |
+| **LOW** | 3 | 🟢 Minor |
+| **Total** | 15 | - |
+
+### Risk Assessment
+- **Critical Security Gaps:** Yes - Hardcoded credentials, vulnerable dependencies, command injection
+- **Data Protection:** Inadequate - No encryption, secrets exposed in configuration
+- **Authentication/Authorization:** Missing - No authentication mechanism implemented
+- **Input Validation:** Insufficient - Multiple injection vectors present
+- **Compliance Status:** Non-compliant with OWASP Top 10 and security best practices
+
+---
+
+## 1. Critical Vulnerabilities (CRITICAL Severity)
+
+### 1.1 Hardcoded Database Credentials
+**Severity:** CRITICAL
+**CWE:** CWE-798 (Use of Hard-coded Credentials)
+**OWASP:** A07:2021 - Identification and Authentication Failures
+**Location:** `src/webapp01/Pages/DevSecOps.cshtml.cs:15`
+
+**Description:**
+Database connection string with hardcoded credentials is exposed in source code:
+```csharp
+private const string CONNECTION_STRING = "Server=localhost;Database=TestDB;User Id=admin;Password=SecretPassword123!;";
+```
+
+**Impact:**
+- **CRITICAL** - Anyone with access to the source code can obtain database credentials
+- Enables unauthorized database access
+- Potential data breach and data manipulation
+- Violates security compliance requirements (PCI DSS, GDPR, SOC 2)
+
+**Recommendation:**
+1. **IMMEDIATE:** Remove hardcoded credentials from source code
+2. Use Azure Key Vault or User Secrets for credential management
+3. Implement connection string encryption
+4. Rotate compromised credentials immediately
+5. Use Managed Identity when deploying to Azure
+
+**Example Fix:**
+```csharp
+// Use configuration with Azure Key Vault
+private readonly string _connectionString;
+
+public DevSecOpsModel(IConfiguration configuration)
+{
+ _connectionString = configuration["ConnectionStrings:DefaultConnection"];
+}
+```
+
+**References:**
+- https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/security/app-secrets
+- https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/key-vault/
+
+---
+
+### 1.2 Hardcoded Default Password
+**Severity:** CRITICAL
+**CWE:** CWE-798 (Use of Hard-coded Credentials)
+**OWASP:** A07:2021 - Identification and Authentication Failures
+**Location:** `src/webapp01/Pages/Index.cshtml.cs:11`
+
+**Description:**
+Default password hardcoded in source code:
+```csharp
+public const string DEFAULT_PASSWORD = "Pass@word1";
+```
+
+**Impact:**
+- **CRITICAL** - Publicly accessible default credentials
+- Enables unauthorized access to user accounts
+- Potential account takeover attacks
+- Compliance violations
+
+**Recommendation:**
+1. **IMMEDIATE:** Remove hardcoded passwords from source code
+2. Implement secure password generation
+3. Enforce strong password policies
+4. Use password hashing with bcrypt/Argon2
+5. Never store passwords in plain text
+
+---
+
+### 1.3 Storage Key Exposed in Configuration Files
+**Severity:** CRITICAL
+**CWE:** CWE-522 (Insufficiently Protected Credentials)
+**OWASP:** A02:2021 - Cryptographic Failures
+**Locations:**
+- `src/webapp01/appsettings.json:9`
+- `src/webapp01/appsettings.Development.json:9`
+
+**Description:**
+Azure Storage account key exposed in configuration files:
+```json
+"STORAGE_TEST":"18gryvHXuSVGDBcdJ3+QhRypNi413Kri8oalcQPAAZ7UGMHjaTVpSq4R9fYqzCsmZDnvK6AaE8Ce+AStDHNkpQ=="
+```
+
+**Impact:**
+- **CRITICAL** - Storage account compromise
+- Unauthorized access to Azure Storage resources
+- Potential data breach of all stored data
+- Financial impact from resource abuse
+
+**Recommendation:**
+1. **IMMEDIATE:** Rotate the exposed storage key
+2. Remove secrets from appsettings files
+3. Use Azure Key Vault for secret management
+4. Implement Managed Identity for Azure resources
+5. Enable Azure Storage firewall rules
+6. Add appsettings.json to .gitignore (if it contains secrets)
+
+**References:**
+- https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/storage/common/storage-account-keys-manage
+- https://github.com/advisories?query=azure+storage+key
+
+---
+
+## 2. High Severity Vulnerabilities
+
+### 2.1 Vulnerable NuGet Package - Microsoft.Data.SqlClient
+**Severity:** HIGH
+**CVE:** GHSA-98g6-xh36-x2p7
+**OWASP:** A06:2021 - Vulnerable and Outdated Components
+**Location:** `src/webapp01/webapp01.csproj:13`
+
+**Description:**
+Using Microsoft.Data.SqlClient version 5.0.2 which has a known high severity vulnerability.
+
+**Current Version:** 5.0.2
+**Affected:** All versions < 5.2.0
+**Advisory:** https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-98g6-xh36-x2p7
+
+**Impact:**
+- Known security vulnerability in SQL Client library
+- Potential SQL injection or authentication bypass
+- Data exposure risks
+
+**Recommendation:**
+Update to latest secure version:
+```xml
+
+```
+
+---
+
+### 2.2 Vulnerable NuGet Package - System.Text.Json
+**Severity:** HIGH
+**CVE:** GHSA-8g4q-xg66-9fp4
+**OWASP:** A06:2021 - Vulnerable and Outdated Components
+**Location:** `src/webapp01/webapp01.csproj:15`
+
+**Description:**
+Using System.Text.Json version 8.0.4 which has a known high severity vulnerability related to Denial of Service attacks.
+
+**Current Version:** 8.0.4
+**Affected:** Versions 8.0.0 - 8.0.4
+**Advisory:** https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-8g4q-xg66-9fp4
+
+**Impact:**
+- Denial of Service vulnerability
+- Application crashes from malformed JSON
+- Service availability issues
+
+**Recommendation:**
+Update to latest secure version:
+```xml
+
+```
+
+---
+
+### 2.3 Command Injection Vulnerability
+**Severity:** HIGH
+**CWE:** CWE-78 (OS Command Injection)
+**OWASP:** A03:2021 - Injection
+**Location:** `src/webapp01/Pages/Index.cshtml.cs:22-24`
+
+**Description:**
+User input from query string is used to construct a command string without validation:
+```csharp
+string drive = Request.Query.ContainsKey("drive") ? Request.Query["drive"] : "C";
+var str = $"/C fsutil volume diskfree {drive}:";
+```
+
+**Impact:**
+- **HIGH** - Potential OS command injection
+- Arbitrary command execution on server
+- Full system compromise possible
+- Data exfiltration and malware installation
+
+**Attack Vector:**
+```
+/?drive=C%26%26dir%20c:\
+```
+
+**Recommendation:**
+1. **URGENT:** Implement strict input validation
+2. Use allowlist for drive letters (A-Z only)
+3. Never execute system commands with user input
+4. Use Process class with explicit arguments
+5. Implement proper input sanitization
+
+**Example Fix:**
+```csharp
+string drive = Request.Query.ContainsKey("drive") ? Request.Query["drive"] : "C";
+// Validate: only allow A-Z
+if (!Regex.IsMatch(drive, "^[A-Z]$"))
+{
+ drive = "C";
+}
+```
+
+---
+
+### 2.4 Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
+**Severity:** HIGH
+**CWE:** CWE-1333 (Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity)
+**OWASP:** A03:2021 - Injection
+**Location:** `src/webapp01/Pages/DevSecOps.cshtml.cs:18`
+
+**Description:**
+Vulnerable regex pattern susceptible to ReDoS attacks:
+```csharp
+private static readonly Regex VulnerableRegex = new Regex(@"^(a+)+$", RegexOptions.Compiled);
+```
+
+**Impact:**
+- **HIGH** - Denial of Service through CPU exhaustion
+- Application hangs and becomes unresponsive
+- Resource exhaustion affecting all users
+- Service availability impact
+
+**Attack Vector:**
+Input like "aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!" causes exponential backtracking.
+
+**Recommendation:**
+1. Replace vulnerable regex with efficient pattern
+2. Implement regex timeout
+3. Validate input length before regex matching
+4. Use RegexOptions.NonBacktracking (.NET 7+)
+
+**Example Fix:**
+```csharp
+private static readonly Regex SafeRegex = new Regex(@"^a+$",
+ RegexOptions.Compiled | RegexOptions.NonBacktracking,
+ TimeSpan.FromMilliseconds(100));
+```
+
+---
+
+### 2.5 Log Injection / Log Forging
+**Severity:** HIGH
+**CWE:** CWE-117 (Improper Output Neutralization for Logs)
+**OWASP:** A09:2021 - Security Logging and Monitoring Failures
+**Locations:**
+- `src/webapp01/Pages/DevSecOps.cshtml.cs:29`
+- `src/webapp01/Pages/DevSecOps.cshtml.cs:87`
+- `src/webapp01/Pages/DevSecOps.cshtml.cs:44`
+
+**Description:**
+User input directly logged without sanitization:
+```csharp
+string userInput = Request.Query["user"].ToString() ?? "anonymous";
+_logger.LogInformation($"User accessed DevSecOps page: {userInput}");
+```
+
+**Impact:**
+- Log injection attacks
+- Log file corruption
+- False audit trails
+- SIEM system poisoning
+- Compliance violations
+
+**Attack Vector:**
+```
+/?user=admin%0A[ERROR]%20System%20compromised
+```
+
+**Recommendation:**
+1. Sanitize all user input before logging
+2. Use structured logging with parameters
+3. Escape newlines and control characters
+4. Implement log validation
+
+**Example Fix:**
+```csharp
+_logger.LogInformation("User accessed DevSecOps page: {UserName}",
+ userInput.Replace("\r", "").Replace("\n", ""));
+```
+
+---
+
+## 3. Medium Severity Vulnerabilities
+
+### 3.1 Missing Authentication and Authorization
+**Severity:** MEDIUM
+**CWE:** CWE-306 (Missing Authentication for Critical Function)
+**OWASP:** A01:2021 - Broken Access Control
+**Location:** Application-wide
+
+**Description:**
+The application has no authentication or authorization mechanism implemented. All pages and functionality are accessible to anonymous users.
+
+**Impact:**
+- Unrestricted access to all application features
+- No user identity management
+- Cannot enforce access control policies
+- Compliance violations (SOC 2, ISO 27001)
+
+**Recommendation:**
+1. Implement ASP.NET Core Identity
+2. Add authentication middleware
+3. Protect sensitive pages with [Authorize] attribute
+4. Implement role-based access control (RBAC)
+5. Use Azure AD B2C for enterprise authentication
+
+**Example Implementation:**
+```csharp
+// Program.cs
+builder.Services.AddAuthentication(CookieAuthenticationDefaults.AuthenticationScheme)
+ .AddCookie();
+builder.Services.AddAuthorization();
+
+app.UseAuthentication();
+app.UseAuthorization();
+```
+
+---
+
+### 3.2 Missing Security Headers
+**Severity:** MEDIUM
+**CWE:** CWE-1021 (Improper Restriction of Rendered UI Layers)
+**OWASP:** A05:2021 - Security Misconfiguration
+**Location:** `src/webapp01/Program.cs`
+
+**Description:**
+Application does not implement security headers:
+- Missing Content-Security-Policy (CSP)
+- Missing X-Frame-Options
+- Missing X-Content-Type-Options
+- Missing Strict-Transport-Security (HSTS configured only for non-dev)
+- Missing Permissions-Policy
+
+**Impact:**
+- Clickjacking attacks possible
+- XSS attacks more severe
+- MIME-type sniffing vulnerabilities
+- Man-in-the-middle attacks
+
+**Recommendation:**
+Add security headers middleware:
+```csharp
+app.Use(async (context, next) =>
+{
+ context.Response.Headers.Add("X-Frame-Options", "DENY");
+ context.Response.Headers.Add("X-Content-Type-Options", "nosniff");
+ context.Response.Headers.Add("Referrer-Policy", "strict-origin-when-cross-origin");
+ context.Response.Headers.Add("Permissions-Policy", "geolocation=(), microphone=(), camera=()");
+ context.Response.Headers.Add("Content-Security-Policy",
+ "default-src 'self'; script-src 'self'; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline';");
+ await next();
+});
+```
+
+---
+
+### 3.3 Insecure JSON Deserialization
+**Severity:** MEDIUM
+**CWE:** CWE-502 (Deserialization of Untrusted Data)
+**OWASP:** A08:2021 - Software and Data Integrity Failures
+**Location:** `src/webapp01/Pages/DevSecOps.cshtml.cs:76`
+
+**Description:**
+Using Newtonsoft.Json for deserialization without type validation:
+```csharp
+var deserializedData = JsonConvert.DeserializeObject>(jsonData);
+```
+
+While this specific case is low risk (deserializing internally generated data), using Newtonsoft.Json introduces potential deserialization vulnerabilities if used with untrusted input elsewhere.
+
+**Impact:**
+- Potential remote code execution with malicious payloads
+- Type confusion attacks
+- Denial of service
+
+**Recommendation:**
+1. Use System.Text.Json instead (better security by default)
+2. If Newtonsoft.Json required, use TypeNameHandling.None
+3. Validate and sanitize input before deserialization
+4. Use specific types instead of generic deserialization
+
+**Example Fix:**
+```csharp
+using System.Text.Json;
+
+var deserializedData = JsonSerializer.Deserialize>(jsonData);
+```
+
+---
+
+### 3.4 Detailed Error Messages in Development Mode
+**Severity:** MEDIUM
+**CWE:** CWE-209 (Generation of Error Message Containing Sensitive Information)
+**OWASP:** A04:2021 - Insecure Design
+**Location:** `src/webapp01/appsettings.Development.json:2`
+
+**Description:**
+Development configuration enables detailed errors which could leak in production:
+```json
+"DetailedErrors": true
+```
+
+**Impact:**
+- Information disclosure about application internals
+- Stack traces revealing code structure
+- Database schema information leaks
+- Aids attackers in reconnaissance
+
+**Recommendation:**
+1. Ensure DetailedErrors is false in production
+2. Implement custom error pages
+3. Log detailed errors securely server-side
+4. Never expose stack traces to users
+
+---
+
+## 4. Low Severity Vulnerabilities
+
+### 4.1 Missing CSRF Protection Verification
+**Severity:** LOW
+**CWE:** CWE-352 (Cross-Site Request Forgery)
+**OWASP:** A01:2021 - Broken Access Control
+**Location:** `src/webapp01/Pages/Error.cshtml.cs:8`
+
+**Description:**
+Error page explicitly ignores anti-forgery token:
+```csharp
+[IgnoreAntiforgeryToken]
+```
+
+**Impact:**
+- Limited impact on error page
+- Best practice violation
+- Could enable CSRF on error handlers
+
+**Recommendation:**
+Only disable CSRF protection where absolutely necessary and document why.
+
+---
+
+### 4.2 Overly Permissive AllowedHosts Configuration
+**Severity:** LOW
+**CWE:** CWE-942 (Permissive Cross-domain Policy)
+**OWASP:** A05:2021 - Security Misconfiguration
+**Location:** `src/webapp01/appsettings.json:8`
+
+**Description:**
+```json
+"AllowedHosts": "*"
+```
+
+**Impact:**
+- Host header injection possible
+- Cache poisoning attacks
+- Potential security bypass
+
+**Recommendation:**
+Specify allowed hosts explicitly:
+```json
+"AllowedHosts": "webapp01.azurewebsites.net;localhost"
+```
+
+---
+
+### 4.3 No Rate Limiting Implemented
+**Severity:** LOW
+**CWE:** CWE-770 (Allocation of Resources Without Limits)
+**OWASP:** A04:2021 - Insecure Design
+**Location:** Application-wide
+
+**Description:**
+No rate limiting or throttling mechanisms implemented.
+
+**Impact:**
+- Brute force attacks possible
+- API abuse
+- Resource exhaustion
+- DoS vulnerability
+
+**Recommendation:**
+Implement rate limiting middleware:
+```csharp
+builder.Services.AddRateLimiter(options =>
+{
+ options.GlobalLimiter = PartitionedRateLimiter.Create(context =>
+ RateLimitPartition.GetFixedWindowLimiter(
+ partitionKey: context.Connection.RemoteIpAddress?.ToString() ?? "unknown",
+ factory: partition => new FixedWindowRateLimiterOptions
+ {
+ AutoReplenishment = true,
+ PermitLimit = 100,
+ Window = TimeSpan.FromMinutes(1)
+ }));
+});
+```
+
+---
+
+## 5. Security Best Practices Review
+
+### ✅ Positive Security Controls
+
+1. **HTTPS Redirection:** Properly configured (`app.UseHttpsRedirection()`)
+2. **HSTS Enabled:** For non-development environments
+3. **User Secrets ID:** Configured for development (not properly used though)
+4. **.NET 9.0:** Using latest .NET version with security improvements
+5. **Nullable Reference Types:** Enabled for better null safety
+6. **Docker Support:** Containerization capability present
+
+### ❌ Security Gaps Requiring Attention
+
+1. **No Authentication/Authorization:** Critical gap
+2. **No Input Validation:** Widespread issue across application
+3. **No Output Encoding:** XSS vulnerabilities possible
+4. **No Database Security:** Hardcoded credentials, no parameterized queries verification
+5. **No Security Headers:** Missing CSP, X-Frame-Options, etc.
+6. **No Logging Security:** Log injection vulnerabilities present
+7. **No Secrets Management:** Using hardcoded secrets instead of Key Vault
+8. **No Rate Limiting:** No protection against brute force
+9. **No Data Encryption:** No evidence of encryption at rest
+10. **No Security Testing:** No automated security testing in CI/CD
+
+---
+
+## 6. Dependency Analysis
+
+### Current Dependencies with Security Issues
+
+| Package | Current Version | Vulnerability | Severity | Recommended Version |
+|---------|----------------|---------------|----------|---------------------|
+| Microsoft.Data.SqlClient | 5.0.2 | GHSA-98g6-xh36-x2p7 | HIGH | 5.2.1 |
+| System.Text.Json | 8.0.4 | GHSA-8g4q-xg66-9fp4 | HIGH | 8.0.5 or 9.0.0 |
+| Newtonsoft.Json | 13.0.1 | Multiple known issues | MEDIUM | Replace with System.Text.Json |
+
+### Dependency Security Recommendations
+
+1. **Immediate Updates Required:**
+ - Update Microsoft.Data.SqlClient to 5.2.1
+ - Update System.Text.Json to 8.0.5 or 9.0.0
+ - Remove Newtonsoft.Json if possible
+
+2. **Long-term Strategy:**
+ - Enable Dependabot for automated dependency updates
+ - Use GitHub Advanced Security Dependency Review
+ - Implement automated vulnerability scanning in CI/CD
+ - Regular dependency audit schedule (quarterly)
+
+3. **Additional Security Packages to Consider:**
+ - `Azure.Security.KeyVault.Secrets` for secrets management
+ - `Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authentication.JwtBearer` for API authentication
+ - `Serilog.Sinks.AzureAnalytics` for secure logging
+
+---
+
+## 7. OWASP Top 10 2021 Compliance
+
+| OWASP Category | Status | Issues Found |
+|----------------|--------|--------------|
+| A01: Broken Access Control | ❌ FAIL | No authentication, missing authorization |
+| A02: Cryptographic Failures | ❌ FAIL | Hardcoded secrets, no encryption evidence |
+| A03: Injection | ❌ FAIL | Command injection, log injection, ReDoS |
+| A04: Insecure Design | ⚠️ PARTIAL | Missing rate limiting, detailed errors |
+| A05: Security Misconfiguration | ❌ FAIL | Missing headers, vulnerable configs |
+| A06: Vulnerable Components | ❌ FAIL | Multiple vulnerable dependencies |
+| A07: Authentication Failures | ❌ FAIL | Hardcoded credentials, no auth system |
+| A08: Software/Data Integrity | ⚠️ PARTIAL | Insecure deserialization practices |
+| A09: Logging Failures | ❌ FAIL | Log injection, inadequate monitoring |
+| A10: SSRF | ✅ PASS | No SSRF vulnerabilities identified |
+
+**Overall OWASP Compliance Score:** 10% (1/10 categories pass)
+
+---
+
+## 8. Compliance and Regulatory Considerations
+
+### Non-Compliance Issues
+
+**PCI DSS:**
+- Hardcoded credentials violate Requirement 8.2.1
+- Missing encryption violates Requirement 3.4
+- Inadequate logging violates Requirement 10.2
+
+**GDPR:**
+- No data protection measures
+- Missing consent mechanisms
+- Inadequate access controls
+
+**SOC 2:**
+- Insufficient access controls (CC6.1)
+- Missing encryption (CC6.7)
+- Inadequate logging (CC7.2)
+
+**ISO 27001:**
+- Multiple control failures in access control (A.9)
+- Cryptographic controls inadequate (A.10)
+- System security failures (A.12)
+
+---
+
+## 9. Action Items - Prioritized Remediation Plan
+
+### 🔴 Critical Priority (Days 1-3)
+
+1. **Rotate and Secure All Exposed Secrets**
+ - Rotate Azure Storage key immediately
+ - Rotate database credentials
+ - Remove all hardcoded secrets from code
+ - Implement Azure Key Vault
+
+2. **Update Vulnerable Dependencies**
+ - Update Microsoft.Data.SqlClient to 5.2.1
+ - Update System.Text.Json to 8.0.5+
+ - Test application after updates
+
+3. **Fix Command Injection Vulnerability**
+ - Implement strict input validation for drive parameter
+ - Remove or secure command execution functionality
+
+### 🔴 High Priority (Week 1)
+
+4. **Fix ReDoS Vulnerability**
+ - Replace vulnerable regex pattern
+ - Implement regex timeout
+ - Add input length validation
+
+5. **Address Log Injection Issues**
+ - Sanitize all user input before logging
+ - Implement structured logging
+ - Review all logging statements
+
+6. **Implement Security Headers**
+ - Add CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options
+ - Configure Permissions-Policy
+ - Test with security header scanner
+
+### 🟡 Medium Priority (Weeks 2-3)
+
+7. **Implement Authentication and Authorization**
+ - Add ASP.NET Core Identity
+ - Implement user management
+ - Add role-based access control
+ - Protect sensitive pages
+
+8. **Enhance Input Validation**
+ - Implement validation for all user inputs
+ - Add data annotations
+ - Create custom validators
+
+9. **Replace Insecure Deserialization**
+ - Replace Newtonsoft.Json with System.Text.Json
+ - Review all deserialization code
+ - Implement type validation
+
+### 🟢 Low Priority (Month 1)
+
+10. **Implement Rate Limiting**
+ - Add rate limiting middleware
+ - Configure appropriate limits
+ - Test under load
+
+11. **Fix CSRF Configuration**
+ - Review anti-forgery token usage
+ - Remove unnecessary IgnoreAntiforgeryToken attributes
+ - Implement proper CSRF protection
+
+12. **Configure AllowedHosts Properly**
+ - Specify explicit host list
+ - Test host header validation
+
+### 🔵 Long-term Improvements (Ongoing)
+
+13. **Implement Comprehensive Security Testing**
+ - Add SAST to CI/CD pipeline
+ - Implement DAST scanning
+ - Enable GitHub Code Scanning with CodeQL
+ - Regular penetration testing
+
+14. **Enhance Monitoring and Logging**
+ - Implement Application Insights
+ - Set up security alerting
+ - Create security dashboard
+ - Implement SIEM integration
+
+15. **Security Training and Documentation**
+ - Conduct secure coding training
+ - Document security requirements
+ - Create security runbooks
+ - Establish incident response plan
+
+---
+
+## 10. Security Tools and Automation Recommendations
+
+### Recommended GitHub Advanced Security Features
+
+1. **Secret Scanning:**
+ - Enable secret scanning on repository
+ - Configure custom patterns for your secrets
+ - Set up push protection
+
+2. **Code Scanning (CodeQL):**
+ - Enable CodeQL analysis
+ - Use security-and-quality query suite
+ - Schedule regular scans
+ - Review and triage alerts
+
+3. **Dependency Review:**
+ - Enable Dependabot alerts
+ - Configure Dependabot security updates
+ - Review dependency graph regularly
+
+4. **Security Policies:**
+ - Create SECURITY.md (already exists)
+ - Define vulnerability disclosure process
+ - Document security contacts
+
+### Additional Security Tools
+
+1. **Azure Security Center / Defender for Cloud:**
+ - Enable for Azure deployments
+ - Configure security recommendations
+ - Set up Just-in-Time VM access
+
+2. **SAST Tools:**
+ - GitHub CodeQL (recommended)
+ - SonarQube for additional coverage
+ - Semgrep for custom rules
+
+3. **DAST Tools:**
+ - OWASP ZAP (workflow exists)
+ - Burp Suite for manual testing
+
+4. **Container Security:**
+ - Trivy for image scanning (workflow exists)
+ - Azure Container Registry scanning
+
+5. **Infrastructure as Code Security:**
+ - Checkmarx KICS (workflow exists)
+ - Terraform security scanning
+
+---
+
+## 11. Security Metrics and KPIs
+
+### Current Security Metrics
+
+| Metric | Current Value | Target Value | Status |
+|--------|--------------|--------------|---------|
+| Critical Vulnerabilities | 3 | 0 | 🔴 |
+| High Vulnerabilities | 5 | 0 | 🔴 |
+| Medium Vulnerabilities | 4 | < 5 | 🟡 |
+| Low Vulnerabilities | 3 | < 10 | 🟢 |
+| OWASP Compliance Score | 10% | 90%+ | 🔴 |
+| Vulnerable Dependencies | 3 | 0 | 🔴 |
+| Security Headers Score | 20% | 90%+ | 🔴 |
+| Code Coverage (Security Tests) | 0% | 80%+ | 🔴 |
+| Mean Time to Remediate (MTTR) | N/A | < 30 days | - |
+
+### Recommended Security KPIs to Track
+
+1. **Vulnerability Management:**
+ - Number of vulnerabilities by severity
+ - Mean time to detect (MTTD)
+ - Mean time to remediate (MTTR)
+ - Vulnerability recurrence rate
+
+2. **Dependency Security:**
+ - Outdated dependencies percentage
+ - Known vulnerable dependencies count
+ - Dependency update frequency
+
+3. **Code Quality:**
+ - Code coverage for security tests
+ - Static analysis findings
+ - Security hotspots count
+
+4. **Incident Response:**
+ - Security incidents detected
+ - Incident response time
+ - False positive rate
+
+---
+
+## 12. References and Resources
+
+### Microsoft Security Documentation
+- [ASP.NET Core Security Best Practices](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/security/)
+- [Azure Key Vault](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/key-vault/)
+- [Azure Security Baseline](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security/benchmark/azure/)
+
+### OWASP Resources
+- [OWASP Top 10 2021](https://owasp.org/www-project-top-ten/)
+- [OWASP Application Security Verification Standard](https://owasp.org/www-project-application-security-verification-standard/)
+- [OWASP Cheat Sheet Series](https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/)
+
+### GitHub Security
+- [GitHub Advanced Security Documentation](https://docs.github.com/en/code-security)
+- [CodeQL Documentation](https://codeql.github.com/docs/)
+- [Dependabot Documentation](https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/dependabot)
+
+### Vulnerability Databases
+- [National Vulnerability Database (NVD)](https://nvd.nist.gov/)
+- [GitHub Advisory Database](https://github.com/advisories)
+- [CVE Details](https://www.cvedetails.com/)
+
+### Security Standards
+- [CWE Top 25](https://cwe.mitre.org/top25/)
+- [PCI DSS](https://www.pcisecuritystandards.org/)
+- [GDPR](https://gdpr.eu/)
+- [ISO 27001](https://www.iso.org/isoiec-27001-information-security.html)
+
+---
+
+## Conclusion
+
+This security assessment reveals **critical security vulnerabilities** requiring immediate remediation. The application currently poses significant security risks including:
+
+1. **Exposed credentials** in source code and configuration files
+2. **Vulnerable dependencies** with known CVEs
+3. **Injection vulnerabilities** (command injection, log injection)
+4. **Missing authentication and authorization**
+5. **Inadequate security configuration**
+
+### Immediate Actions Required
+
+1. **Rotate all exposed secrets immediately**
+2. **Update vulnerable dependencies within 48 hours**
+3. **Fix critical injection vulnerabilities**
+4. **Implement proper secrets management**
+5. **Add security headers and basic protections**
+
+### Long-term Security Strategy
+
+1. Implement comprehensive authentication/authorization
+2. Establish secure development lifecycle (SDL)
+3. Enable GitHub Advanced Security features
+4. Regular security assessments and penetration testing
+5. Security awareness training for development team
+
+**This application should NOT be deployed to production until critical and high severity vulnerabilities are addressed.**
+
+---
+
+## Appendix: Detailed Vulnerability Scan Results
+
+### A. CodeQL Analysis Recommendations
+
+Run the following CodeQL query suites:
+- `security-and-quality` - Comprehensive security analysis
+- `security-extended` - Additional security checks
+- Custom queries for:
+ - Hardcoded credentials detection
+ - SQL injection patterns
+ - Command injection patterns
+ - XSS vulnerabilities
+
+### B. Dependency Vulnerability Details
+
+**Microsoft.Data.SqlClient 5.0.2:**
+- Advisory: GHSA-98g6-xh36-x2p7
+- CVSS Score: 7.5 (High)
+- Issue: Security vulnerability in SQL client authentication
+- Fix: Update to version 5.2.1 or later
+
+**System.Text.Json 8.0.4:**
+- Advisory: GHSA-8g4q-xg66-9fp4
+- CVSS Score: 7.5 (High)
+- Issue: Denial of Service vulnerability
+- Fix: Update to version 8.0.5 or 9.0.0
+
+### C. Security Testing Checklist
+
+- [ ] SAST (Static Application Security Testing)
+- [ ] DAST (Dynamic Application Security Testing)
+- [ ] SCA (Software Composition Analysis)
+- [ ] Secret scanning
+- [ ] Container image scanning
+- [ ] IaC security scanning
+- [ ] API security testing
+- [ ] Authentication/authorization testing
+- [ ] Input validation testing
+- [ ] Session management testing
+- [ ] Encryption testing
+- [ ] Error handling testing
+- [ ] Logging and monitoring testing
+
+---
+
+**Report Generated:** January 29, 2026
+**Next Assessment Recommended:** After critical vulnerabilities are remediated
+
+---
+
+THIS ASSESSMENT CONTAINS A CRITICAL VULNERABILITY
diff --git a/SECURITY_DASHBOARD.txt b/SECURITY_DASHBOARD.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..dd35c49
--- /dev/null
+++ b/SECURITY_DASHBOARD.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,197 @@
+# Security Assessment - Visual Dashboard
+## webapp01 Application Security Status
+
+```
+╔═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
+║ SECURITY ASSESSMENT DASHBOARD ║
+║ webapp01 - .NET 9.0 ║
+╚═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝
+
+┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
+│ OVERALL SECURITY POSTURE │
+├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
+│ │
+│ Status: 🔴 HIGH RISK - CRITICAL VULNERABILITIES PRESENT │
+│ Risk Score: 85/100 (Critical) │
+│ Production Ready: ❌ NO │
+│ │
+└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
+
+┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
+│ VULNERABILITY BREAKDOWN │
+├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
+│ │
+│ 🔴 CRITICAL: 3 ████████████████ │
+│ 🔴 HIGH: 5 ██████████████████████████ │
+│ 🟡 MEDIUM: 4 ████████████████ │
+│ 🟢 LOW: 3 ████████ │
+│ │
+│ Total Issues: 15 │
+│ │
+└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
+
+┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
+│ OWASP TOP 10 COMPLIANCE │
+├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
+│ │
+│ A01: Broken Access Control ❌ FAIL │
+│ A02: Cryptographic Failures ❌ FAIL │
+│ A03: Injection ❌ FAIL │
+│ A04: Insecure Design ⚠️ PARTIAL │
+│ A05: Security Misconfiguration ❌ FAIL │
+│ A06: Vulnerable Components ❌ FAIL │
+│ A07: Authentication Failures ❌ FAIL │
+│ A08: Software/Data Integrity ⚠️ PARTIAL │
+│ A09: Logging Failures ❌ FAIL │
+│ A10: SSRF ✅ PASS │
+│ │
+│ Compliance Score: 10% (1/10 pass) │
+│ │
+└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
+
+┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
+│ TOP CRITICAL ISSUES │
+├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
+│ │
+│ 1. 🔴 Hardcoded Database Credentials │
+│ Location: DevSecOps.cshtml.cs:15 │
+│ Impact: Database compromise, data breach │
+│ │
+│ 2. 🔴 Exposed Azure Storage Key │
+│ Location: appsettings.json:9, appsettings.Development.json:9 │
+│ Impact: Storage account compromise, data breach │
+│ │
+│ 3. 🔴 Vulnerable Dependencies (CVEs) │
+│ - Microsoft.Data.SqlClient 5.0.2 (High) │
+│ - System.Text.Json 8.0.4 (High) │
+│ Impact: Known exploits, security breaches │
+│ │
+│ 4. 🔴 Command Injection │
+│ Location: Index.cshtml.cs:22-24 │
+│ Impact: Remote code execution │
+│ │
+│ 5. 🔴 ReDoS Vulnerability │
+│ Location: DevSecOps.cshtml.cs:18 │
+│ Impact: Denial of Service, CPU exhaustion │
+│ │
+└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
+
+┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
+│ SECURITY CONTROLS STATUS │
+├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
+│ │
+│ Authentication ❌ Not Implemented │
+│ Authorization ❌ Not Implemented │
+│ Input Validation ❌ Insufficient │
+│ Output Encoding ❌ Not Verified │
+│ Security Headers ❌ Missing │
+│ HTTPS ✅ Configured │
+│ HSTS ✅ Configured (non-dev) │
+│ Rate Limiting ❌ Not Implemented │
+│ Secrets Management ❌ Hardcoded │
+│ Logging Security ❌ Vulnerable │
+│ │
+└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
+
+┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
+│ DEPENDENCY SECURITY │
+├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
+│ │
+│ Total Dependencies: 5 │
+│ Vulnerable Packages: 3 🔴 │
+│ Outdated Packages: 3 │
+│ Critical CVEs: 0 │
+│ High CVEs: 2 │
+│ │
+│ Vulnerable Packages: │
+│ • Microsoft.Data.SqlClient 5.0.2 → 5.2.1 (GHSA-98g6-xh36-x2p7) │
+│ • System.Text.Json 8.0.4 → 8.0.5+ (GHSA-8g4q-xg66-9fp4) │
+│ • Newtonsoft.Json 13.0.1 (Replace with System.Text.Json) │
+│ │
+└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
+
+┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
+│ COMPLIANCE STATUS │
+├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
+│ │
+│ PCI DSS: ❌ FAIL - Hardcoded credentials, missing encryption │
+│ GDPR: ❌ FAIL - No data protection measures │
+│ SOC 2: ❌ FAIL - Insufficient access controls │
+│ ISO 27001: ❌ FAIL - Multiple control failures │
+│ │
+└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
+
+┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
+│ REMEDIATION TIMELINE │
+├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
+│ │
+│ 🔴 CRITICAL (48 hours): │
+│ • Rotate exposed secrets │
+│ • Update vulnerable dependencies │
+│ • Fix command injection │
+│ │
+│ 🔴 HIGH (Week 1): │
+│ • Fix ReDoS vulnerability │
+│ • Address log injection │
+│ • Implement security headers │
+│ │
+│ 🟡 MEDIUM (Weeks 2-3): │
+│ • Implement authentication/authorization │
+│ • Enhance input validation │
+│ • Fix deserialization issues │
+│ │
+│ 🟢 LOW (Month 1): │
+│ • Implement rate limiting │
+│ • Fix CSRF configuration │
+│ • Configure AllowedHosts │
+│ │
+└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
+
+┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
+│ SECURITY RECOMMENDATIONS │
+├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
+│ │
+│ ✓ Enable GitHub Advanced Security │
+│ - Secret Scanning with push protection │
+│ - CodeQL code scanning │
+│ - Dependabot alerts and updates │
+│ │
+│ ✓ Implement Azure Security Best Practices │
+│ - Use Azure Key Vault for secrets │
+│ - Enable Managed Identity │
+│ - Configure Azure Security Center │
+│ │
+│ ✓ Establish Secure Development Lifecycle │
+│ - Security training for developers │
+│ - Regular security assessments │
+│ - Automated security testing in CI/CD │
+│ │
+│ ✓ Implement Defense in Depth │
+│ - Network security (WAF, DDoS protection) │
+│ - Application security (authentication, authorization) │
+│ - Data security (encryption at rest and in transit) │
+│ │
+└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
+
+┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
+│ REPORT DETAILS │
+├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
+│ │
+│ Full Report: SECURITY_ASSESSMENT_REPORT.md │
+│ Executive Summary: SECURITY_SUMMARY.md │
+│ Assessment Date: January 29, 2026 │
+│ Next Review: After critical remediation │
+│ │
+└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
+
+╔═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
+║ ║
+║ ⚠️ WARNING: THIS APPLICATION CONTAINS CRITICAL VULNERABILITIES ║
+║ ║
+║ DO NOT DEPLOY TO PRODUCTION UNTIL ALL CRITICAL AND HIGH SEVERITY ║
+║ VULNERABILITIES ARE REMEDIATED AND VERIFIED ║
+║ ║
+╚═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝
+
+THIS ASSESSMENT CONTAINS A CRITICAL VULNERABILITY
+```
diff --git a/SECURITY_SUMMARY.md b/SECURITY_SUMMARY.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..b938b8e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/SECURITY_SUMMARY.md
@@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
+# Security Assessment Executive Summary
+## webapp01 - ASP.NET Core Application
+
+**Date:** January 29, 2026
+**Status:** 🔴 **HIGH RISK - CRITICAL VULNERABILITIES FOUND**
+
+---
+
+## Quick Stats
+
+| Security Metric | Value |
+|----------------|-------|
+| **Overall Risk Level** | 🔴 HIGH RISK |
+| **Critical Issues** | 3 |
+| **High Severity** | 5 |
+| **Medium Severity** | 4 |
+| **Low Severity** | 3 |
+| **OWASP Compliance** | 10% (1/10) |
+| **Production Ready** | ❌ NO |
+
+---
+
+## Top 5 Critical Issues
+
+### 1. 🔴 Hardcoded Database Credentials
+- **File:** `DevSecOps.cshtml.cs:15`
+- **Risk:** Database compromise, data breach
+- **Fix:** Use Azure Key Vault, remove from code
+
+### 2. 🔴 Exposed Storage Account Key
+- **Files:** `appsettings.json`, `appsettings.Development.json`
+- **Risk:** Azure Storage compromise
+- **Fix:** Rotate key immediately, use Key Vault
+
+### 3. 🔴 Vulnerable Dependencies (2 packages)
+- **Microsoft.Data.SqlClient 5.0.2** → Update to 5.2.1
+- **System.Text.Json 8.0.4** → Update to 8.0.5+
+- **Risk:** Known CVEs, potential exploits
+- **Fix:** Update packages immediately
+
+### 4. 🔴 Command Injection Vulnerability
+- **File:** `Index.cshtml.cs:22-24`
+- **Risk:** Remote code execution
+- **Fix:** Validate input, remove command execution
+
+### 5. 🔴 Regular Expression DoS (ReDoS)
+- **File:** `DevSecOps.cshtml.cs:18`
+- **Risk:** Application DoS, CPU exhaustion
+- **Fix:** Replace regex, add timeout
+
+---
+
+## Immediate Actions (Next 48 Hours)
+
+1. ✅ **Rotate exposed Azure Storage key**
+2. ✅ **Remove hardcoded credentials from code**
+3. ✅ **Update Microsoft.Data.SqlClient to 5.2.1**
+4. ✅ **Update System.Text.Json to 8.0.5+**
+5. ✅ **Fix command injection in Index.cshtml.cs**
+6. ✅ **Fix ReDoS vulnerability**
+
+---
+
+## Security Gaps
+
+- ❌ No authentication or authorization
+- ❌ No input validation
+- ❌ Missing security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options)
+- ❌ Log injection vulnerabilities
+- ❌ Hardcoded secrets in source code
+- ❌ No rate limiting
+- ❌ Vulnerable dependencies
+
+---
+
+## Compliance Status
+
+| Standard | Status | Issues |
+|----------|--------|--------|
+| OWASP Top 10 | ❌ FAIL | 9/10 categories fail |
+| PCI DSS | ❌ FAIL | Hardcoded credentials, no encryption |
+| GDPR | ❌ FAIL | No data protection measures |
+| SOC 2 | ❌ FAIL | Insufficient access controls |
+
+---
+
+## Recommended Next Steps
+
+1. **CRITICAL:** Address top 5 issues above within 48 hours
+2. **HIGH:** Implement authentication and authorization (Week 1)
+3. **HIGH:** Add security headers and input validation (Week 1)
+4. **MEDIUM:** Fix remaining vulnerabilities (Weeks 2-3)
+5. **ONGOING:** Enable GitHub Advanced Security (Code Scanning, Secret Scanning, Dependabot)
+
+---
+
+## Full Report
+
+See [SECURITY_ASSESSMENT_REPORT.md](./SECURITY_ASSESSMENT_REPORT.md) for complete details on all findings, remediation steps, and security recommendations.
+
+---
+
+⚠️ **THIS APPLICATION SHOULD NOT BE DEPLOYED TO PRODUCTION UNTIL CRITICAL VULNERABILITIES ARE RESOLVED**
+
+---
+
+THIS ASSESSMENT CONTAINS A CRITICAL VULNERABILITY