Skip to content

Conversation

@aldy505
Copy link
Collaborator

@aldy505 aldy505 commented Dec 7, 2025

Although I only seen one user reported this destroyed their self-hosted instance, and I initially thought to move the script elsewhere, I suppose this is a good alternative to really guard it.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 7, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 99.51%. Comparing base (a9a9148) to head (d676f08).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on master.
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #4085   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.51%   99.51%           
=======================================
  Files           3        3           
  Lines         207      207           
=======================================
  Hits          206      206           
  Misses          1        1           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@aldy505 aldy505 merged commit 1b20a28 into master Dec 9, 2025
23 of 24 checks passed
@aldy505 aldy505 deleted the aldy505/guard-wild-unit-test-run branch December 9, 2025 04:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Archived in project

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants