Skip to content

Add an extension for CliqueTrees.jl#2967

Open
odow wants to merge 8 commits intomasterfrom
od/clique-trees
Open

Add an extension for CliqueTrees.jl#2967
odow wants to merge 8 commits intomasterfrom
od/clique-trees

Conversation

@odow
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@odow odow commented Mar 12, 2026

Replacement for #2965

I'm really not sure about this. This is about the 10th thing I have prototyped locally. It's just a mess. And I don't know how to test the situation where the packages aren't loaded without something brittle like "run this file before running this one".

@odow odow force-pushed the od/clique-trees branch from efe77a9 to 8bcb841 Compare March 17, 2026 04:03
@odow odow changed the title Add an extension for CliqueTrees.jl Add an extension for CliqueTrees.jl and LDLFactorizations.jl Mar 17, 2026
@odow odow marked this pull request as draft March 19, 2026 22:56
@odow odow force-pushed the od/clique-trees branch from 8cd38f3 to cee6f12 Compare March 26, 2026 20:50
@odow odow marked this pull request as ready for review March 27, 2026 01:12
@odow
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

odow commented Mar 27, 2026

I now have maintain access to CliqueTrees (thanks @samuelsonric). So the question remains: should we use only CliqueTrees? Or should we also include LDLFactorizations? Using only CliqueTrees would be simpler in the long term.

@mlubin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

mlubin commented Mar 27, 2026

I vote for using only CliqueTrees unless we have a specific reason to add LDLFactorizations. Being a bit faster in some cases isn't a sufficient reason unless this code path is shown to be a bottleneck.

@odow
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

odow commented Mar 27, 2026

Okay let me remove the LDL stuff. We can always add it back later.

@odow odow changed the title Add an extension for CliqueTrees.jl and LDLFactorizations.jl Add an extension for CliqueTrees.jl Mar 27, 2026
@odow odow force-pushed the od/clique-trees branch from 466d07a to 8fb6daa Compare March 27, 2026 01:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants