Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History

security

README.md

Security Module — Secure AI Code Generation

DevSecOps practices for AI-generated code pipelines.

AI-generated code introduces new security risks. This module provides guardrails to ensure generated code meets security standards.

The Risk

AI code generation creates unique security challenges:

Risk Description
Hallucinated vulnerabilities AI may generate insecure patterns it learned from training data
Outdated practices Training data may include deprecated, insecure code
Secrets in prompts Sensitive context may leak into generated code
Dependency confusion AI may suggest malicious or non-existent packages
Prompt injection Malicious input in tickets could manipulate agent behavior

Module Components

Component Purpose Document
Secure Code Generation Prompts and rules for secure code SECURE_CODE_GENERATION.md
Security Gates Automated security checks SECURITY_GATES.md
Supply Chain Security Dependencies and AI model trust SUPPLY_CHAIN_SECURITY.md
Audit Trail Traceability for AI-generated code AUDIT_TRAIL.md

Security Principles

1. Defense in Depth

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Layer 1: PROMPT ENGINEERING                                  │
│ Security-aware prompts, OWASP rules in context              │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
                            │
                            ▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Layer 2: AUTOMATED SCANNING                                  │
│ SAST, secrets detection, dependency audit                   │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
                            │
                            ▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Layer 3: HUMAN REVIEW                                        │
│ Security-focused review for sensitive areas                 │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
                            │
                            ▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Layer 4: RUNTIME PROTECTION                                  │
│ WAF, monitoring, anomaly detection                          │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

2. Least Privilege

  • AI agents should not have access to production credentials
  • Generated code should request minimum necessary permissions
  • Sensitive operations require human approval

3. Trust but Verify

  • AI output is untrusted input
  • Every piece of generated code goes through security gates
  • Security-critical code requires explicit human review

4. Traceability

  • Every line of AI-generated code is traceable
  • Audit trail includes: who requested, what prompt, what was generated
  • Enables investigation if issues are discovered later

Security Escalation Triggers

In addition to standard escalation rules, always escalate for:

Trigger Reason
Authentication/authorization changes High impact if wrong
Cryptography implementation Easy to get wrong
Input validation for user data Injection risks
File system operations Path traversal risks
Database queries with user input SQL injection risks
External API integrations Data exposure risks
Configuration changes Security posture impact

Quick Start

For Individual Developers

  1. Read SECURE_CODE_GENERATION.md
  2. Add security rules to your agent prompt
  3. Run security scanners locally

For Teams

  1. Implement SECURITY_GATES.md in CI/CD
  2. Set up SUPPLY_CHAIN_SECURITY.md
  3. Configure AUDIT_TRAIL.md

For Enterprises

All of the above, plus:

  • Security team review of prompts
  • Regular audit of AI-generated code
  • Incident response plan for AI-related vulnerabilities
  • Compliance documentation

Compliance Mapping

Framework Relevant Controls
SOC 2 CC6.1 (Logical access), CC7.1 (System changes)
ISO 27001 A.14.2 (Development security), A.12.6 (Vulnerability management)
PCI DSS 6.3 (Secure development), 6.5 (Common vulnerabilities)
GDPR Art. 25 (Data protection by design), Art. 32 (Security of processing)

Metrics

Security Metrics to Track

Metric Target Alert
Security gate pass rate > 95% < 90%
Critical/High findings per MR 0 > 0
Time to remediate findings < 1 day > 3 days
False positive rate < 10% > 25%
Security escalation rate 5-15% < 5% or > 25%

Security Dashboard

╔══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
║                 SECURITY POSTURE - AI CODE                    ║
╠══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╣
║ This Week:                                                    ║
║   MRs scanned: 42                                            ║
║   Security gate pass: 95% (40/42)                            ║
║   Critical findings: 0                                        ║
║   High findings: 2 (both remediated)                         ║
╠══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╣
║ Top Findings (Last 30 Days):                                 ║
║   1. Hardcoded credentials (8)                               ║
║   2. Missing input validation (5)                            ║
║   3. Insecure dependency (4)                                 ║
╠══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╣
║ Trend: ↓ 15% fewer findings vs last month                    ║
╚══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝

Implementation Priority

  1. Immediate: Security-aware prompts (free, high impact)
  2. Week 1: Automated security scanning in CI
  3. Week 2: Dependency scanning and lockfiles
  4. Week 3: Audit trail implementation
  5. Ongoing: Security metrics and improvement

Security is not optional. Every AI code generation pipeline needs these controls.