Should we make the committer vote more stringent?

[JonasHelming]

Please comment on this

[jastram]

Can you clarify what you mean by "more stringent"? We have a process, and we should stick to it (I think there have been very few exceptions where we violated it, we should certainly not do that any more).

[JonasHelming]

more stringent means to follow the process :-)
https://github.com/openETCS/governance/wiki/Committer-Election-Guideline

[JonasHelming]

@KlausRuedigerHase
@BerndHekele
Please comment

[jastram]

Then, of course, +1

[BerndHekele]

This process is pretty close to what we intended to do anyway.
I have had once an issue with the procedure: if you have a project with a grat number of commiters which are not reacting it becomes difficult to get the votes.
But, if we have a cleanup of committers from time to time to follow this rule is fine to me.

br
Bernd

+1

[JonasHelming]

OK!
What means "pretty close"? If you want to do anything different we should discuss it and update the documentation

[KlausRuedigerHase]

Hi Jonas,
I agree with Bernd. Look at me, committers are often not responding or responding so late that the subject is of almost no interest any more. Anyway, we can update the documents if that makes sense.

[KlausRuedigerHase]

Wrong button ...! I didn't want to close it now.