According to the spec:
proof_types_supported: OPTIONAL. Object that describes specifics of the key proof(s) that the Credential Issuer supports. It MUST be present if cryptographic_binding_methods_supported is present, and omitted otherwise.
But the example in section A2.2 include the cryptographic_binding_methods_supported, but not the proof_types_supported. All other examples for e.g. sd-jwt-vc do.
Either cryptographic_binding_methods_supported gets removed or proof_types_supported will be added. I would suggest to add it to be aligned with the other examples.
According to the spec:
proof_types_supported: OPTIONAL. Object that describes specifics of the key proof(s) that the Credential Issuer supports. It MUST be present if cryptographic_binding_methods_supported is present, and omitted otherwise.
But the example in section A2.2 include the
cryptographic_binding_methods_supported, but not theproof_types_supported. All other examples for e.g. sd-jwt-vc do.Either
cryptographic_binding_methods_supportedgets removed orproof_types_supportedwill be added. I would suggest to add it to be aligned with the other examples.