diff --git a/data/blogs/tracking-llm-costs-in-production.mdx b/data/blogs/tracking-llm-costs-in-production.mdx
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..31de5bb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/data/blogs/tracking-llm-costs-in-production.mdx
@@ -0,0 +1,310 @@
+---
+title: 'Tracking LLM Costs in Production: Per-Model, Per-Request, Per-User Attribution'
+date: '2026-03-31'
+lastmod: '2026-03-31'
+tags: ['openlit', 'cost-tracking', 'finops', 'llm', 'opentelemetry', 'production']
+draft: false
+summary: Break down LLM costs by model, service, user, and environment using OpenLIT. Auto-calculated token costs exported as OpenTelemetry metrics to Grafana, Datadog, or any backend.
+authors: ['OpenLIT']
+images: ['/static/images/llm-cost-tracking-production.png']
+---
+
+# Tracking LLM Costs in Production: Per-Model, Per-Request, Per-User Attribution
+
+**TL;DR:** OpenLIT auto-calculates the cost of every LLM call based on model, token count, and a configurable pricing table. Costs are exported as OpenTelemetry metrics, so you can break them down by service, environment, model, or any custom attribute — and send the data to Grafana, Datadog, or wherever you already monitor things.
+
+---
+
+## The Problem: Your LLM Bill Is a Black Box
+
+You get an invoice from OpenAI at the end of the month. It says $4,200. You have questions:
+
+- Which service spent the most?
+- Was it the summarization feature or the chatbot?
+- Did someone's runaway test loop burn $800 over the weekend?
+- Is GPT-4o actually worth the premium over GPT-4o-mini for this use case?
+
+The provider dashboard gives you total tokens and total cost. It doesn't tell you which part of your application consumed what. And if you're using multiple providers (OpenAI + Anthropic + Bedrock), you're reconciling across three different billing dashboards.
+
+You need per-request cost attribution at the application level.
+
+## How OpenLIT Tracks Costs
+
+When you call `openlit.init()`, every LLM request is automatically traced with:
+
+- **Model name** (e.g., `gpt-4o`, `claude-sonnet-4-20250514`)
+- **Input tokens** (prompt tokens)
+- **Output tokens** (completion tokens)
+- **Calculated cost** (based on the model's pricing)
+
+The cost calculation happens inside the SDK using a pricing table. Here's the flow:
+
+```
+LLM Call → SDK intercepts → counts tokens → looks up price → emits span + metric
+```
+
+### A Minimal Example
+
+```python
+import openlit
+from openai import OpenAI
+
+openlit.init(
+    otlp_endpoint="http://localhost:4318",
+    application_name="summarizer",
+    environment="production",
+)
+
+client = OpenAI()
+response = client.chat.completions.create(
+    model="gpt-4o",
+    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Summarize this quarterly report..."}],
+)
+```
+
+The trace span for this request will include attributes like:
+
+```
+gen_ai.usage.input_tokens: 1420
+gen_ai.usage.output_tokens: 380
+gen_ai.usage.cost: 0.0142
+gen_ai.request.model: gpt-4o
+gen_ai.system: openai
+deployment.environment: production
+service.name: summarizer
+```
+
+That `gen_ai.usage.cost` value is auto-calculated. You didn't have to look up pricing or do any math.
+
+## How Pricing Works
+
+OpenLIT ships with a built-in pricing table that covers major models from OpenAI, Anthropic, Cohere, Mistral, Google, and others. The table is maintained in a `pricing.json` file that maps model names to per-token costs.
+
+A simplified version looks like this:
+
+```json
+{
+  "chat": {
+    "gpt-4o": {"input": 0.0025, "output": 0.01},
+    "gpt-4o-mini": {"input": 0.00015, "output": 0.0006},
+    "claude-sonnet-4-20250514": {"input": 0.003, "output": 0.015}
+  },
+  "embeddings": {
+    "text-embedding-3-small": 0.00002,
+    "text-embedding-ada-002": 0.0001
+  },
+  "images": {
+    "dall-e-3": {
+      "standard": {"1024x1024": 0.040}
+    }
+  }
+}
+```
+
+Prices are per 1,000 tokens (for chat/completions) or per unit (for images/embeddings).
+
+### Using Custom Pricing
+
+If you're using a model that isn't in the default table — say a fine-tuned model or a provider with custom pricing — you can supply your own:
+
+```python
+openlit.init(
+    pricing_json="/path/to/my-pricing.json",
+)
+```
+
+Or pass a URL:
+
+```python
+openlit.init(
+    pricing_json="https://internal.example.com/llm-pricing.json",
+)
+```
+
+The SDK fetches and caches it at startup. Use the same JSON structure as the default table, and your custom models will get accurate cost tracking.
+
+## Breaking Down Costs by Dimension
+
+Once cost data is flowing, you can slice it by any attribute attached to the trace or metric. The most useful breakdowns:
+
+### By Service / Application
+
+If you set `application_name` per service, costs naturally break down:
+
+```python
+# Service A
+openlit.init(application_name="chatbot")
+
+# Service B
+openlit.init(application_name="summarizer")
+
+# Service C
+openlit.init(application_name="code-review-agent")
+```
+
+Now you can answer: "The chatbot costs $2,100/month, the summarizer costs $1,400/month, and the code-review agent costs $700/month."
+
+### By Model
+
+Every span includes the model name, so you can aggregate cost by model:
+
+- GPT-4o: $2,800/month
+- GPT-4o-mini: $600/month
+- Claude Sonnet: $800/month
+
+This helps you decide when to downgrade. If GPT-4o-mini gives 90% of the quality for 15% of the cost on your summarization task, the numbers make the decision obvious.
+
+### By Environment
+
+```python
+openlit.init(environment="production")  # vs "staging" vs "development"
+```
+
+If your staging environment is burning $500/month on LLM calls, you probably want to know about it. Common fix: use a cheaper model in staging or add rate limits.
+
+### By User (Custom Attributes)
+
+To track costs per user, you need to add the user ID as a span attribute. OpenTelemetry makes this straightforward:
+
+```python
+from opentelemetry import trace
+
+tracer = trace.get_tracer(__name__)
+
+def handle_request(user_id: str, message: str):
+    with tracer.start_as_current_span("user-request") as span:
+        span.set_attribute("user.id", user_id)
+
+        response = client.chat.completions.create(
+            model="gpt-4o",
+            messages=[{"role": "user", "content": message}],
+        )
+        return response.choices[0].message.content
+```
+
+Now the LLM span (auto-created by OpenLIT) is a child of your `user-request` span. In your dashboard, you can group costs by `user.id`.
+
+## Building Cost Dashboards
+
+### In the OpenLIT Platform
+
+The self-hosted OpenLIT dashboard includes built-in cost views:
+
+1. **Total cost over time** — see daily/weekly/monthly trends
+2. **Cost by model** — bar chart breaking down spend per model
+3. **Cost by application** — which service is costing you the most
+4. **Individual request costs** — drill into specific expensive calls
+
+You can also build custom dashboards with the dashboard builder, adding widgets that query ClickHouse directly.
+
+### In Grafana
+
+Since OpenLIT exports OTLP, you can build Grafana dashboards with:
+
+- **Prometheus/Mimir** for cost metrics (histograms, counters)
+- **Tempo** for trace details with cost attributes
+
+Example PromQL for daily cost by model:
+
+```
+sum by (gen_ai_request_model) (
+  rate(gen_ai_usage_cost_total[24h])
+)
+```
+
+### In Datadog
+
+Send OTLP to Datadog's OTLP endpoint. Cost data shows up as custom metrics. Create monitors like:
+
+- Alert if daily cost exceeds $X
+- Alert if a single request costs more than $Y (indicates a runaway prompt)
+- Weekly cost trend report by service
+
+## Setting Up Budget Alerts
+
+The combination of per-request cost tracking and standard metrics backends gives you alerting for free:
+
+**Alert: Daily spend exceeds budget**
+
+Set up a Grafana or Datadog alert on the cumulative daily cost metric. If `sum(gen_ai.usage.cost)` over the last 24 hours exceeds your threshold, fire an alert.
+
+**Alert: Anomalous request cost**
+
+Some requests cost 100x the average because of unexpectedly long prompts or completions. Track the p99 of `gen_ai.usage.cost` and alert if it suddenly spikes.
+
+**Alert: New model appeared**
+
+If someone deploys code that uses an expensive model you didn't approve, you'll see a new `gen_ai.request.model` value in your metrics. Alert on new label values.
+
+## Cost Optimization Strategies
+
+Once you have visibility, optimization follows naturally:
+
+**Switch models where quality allows.** Compare `gpt-4o` vs `gpt-4o-mini` cost with side-by-side quality (use OpenLIT's OpenGround for this). If quality is similar, switch and save 80%.
+
+**Cache repeated prompts.** If you see the same prompt pattern in traces (e.g., summarization of the same document), add a cache layer. Zero LLM cost for cache hits.
+
+**Reduce context length.** If your RAG pipeline stuffs 10 documents into context but the LLM only uses 2, reduce the context window. Fewer input tokens = lower cost.
+
+**Set max_tokens.** If your completion only needs 100 tokens, set `max_tokens=100`. This prevents the model from generating unnecessarily long responses.
+
+**Batch where possible.** Some providers offer lower per-token pricing for batch API calls. If latency isn't critical, batch requests.
+
+## A Complete Cost Tracking Setup
+
+Here's a production-ready setup with cost tracking, custom attributes, and Grafana export:
+
+```python
+import openlit
+from openai import OpenAI
+from opentelemetry import trace
+
+openlit.init(
+    otlp_endpoint="https://grafana-otlp.example.com/otlp",
+    otlp_headers={"Authorization": "Bearer YOUR_GRAFANA_TOKEN"},
+    application_name="my-saas-api",
+    environment="production",
+)
+
+client = OpenAI()
+tracer = trace.get_tracer(__name__)
+
+def generate_response(user_id: str, tier: str, prompt: str) -> str:
+    model = "gpt-4o" if tier == "enterprise" else "gpt-4o-mini"
+
+    with tracer.start_as_current_span("generate") as span:
+        span.set_attribute("user.id", user_id)
+        span.set_attribute("user.tier", tier)
+
+        response = client.chat.completions.create(
+            model=model,
+            messages=[{"role": "user", "content": prompt}],
+        )
+        return response.choices[0].message.content
+```
+
+Now you can answer: "Enterprise users cost us $X/month on GPT-4o, free-tier users cost $Y/month on GPT-4o-mini."
+
+---
+
+## FAQ
+
+**How do I add custom model pricing?**
+
+Create a JSON file following the same structure as the default `pricing.json` and pass it to `openlit.init(pricing_json="/path/to/custom.json")`. You can also pass a URL to load pricing from a remote server.
+
+**Does it work with fine-tuned models?**
+
+Yes. Add your fine-tuned model's name and pricing to a custom pricing JSON. The model name in the JSON must match the model name you pass to the provider's API.
+
+**What if the pricing table is outdated?**
+
+The default pricing table is updated with each SDK release. Between releases, you can override with a custom JSON pointing to a URL that you control and update as needed.
+
+**How accurate is the cost calculation?**
+
+It's based on the token count reported by the provider and the per-token price in the pricing table. For chat/completion models, accuracy is very high. For image and embedding models, it depends on the pricing model (per-image, per-token, etc.).
+
+**Can I track costs across multiple providers?**
+
+Yes. OpenLIT instruments all providers uniformly. If a request goes to OpenAI and another to Anthropic, both get cost attributes. Aggregate them in your dashboard for a unified view.
diff --git a/public/static/images/llm-cost-tracking-production.png b/public/static/images/llm-cost-tracking-production.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..097ae93
Binary files /dev/null and b/public/static/images/llm-cost-tracking-production.png differ