No more Benchmark runs will be launched as NO measurements were obtained from the previous run!

[megakid]

Using the exact dependencies (NUnit 3.7.1, Benchmark.NET 0.10.8 and CodeJam.PerfTests.NUnit 0.1.4-beta) and the wiki example:

    [Category("PerfTests: NUnit examples")]
    [CompetitionAnnotateSources] // Opt-in feature: source annotations.
    public class SimplePerfTest
    {
        private const int Count = 200;

        // Perf test runner method.
        [Test]
        public void RunSimplePerfTest() => Competition.Run(this);

        // Baseline competition member.
        // All relative metrics will be compared with metrics of the baseline method.
        [CompetitionBaseline]
        public void Baseline() => Thread.SpinWait(Count);

        // Competition member #1. Should take ~3x more time to run.
        [CompetitionBenchmark]
        public void SlowerX3() => Thread.SpinWait(3 * Count);

        // Competition member #2. Should take ~5x more time to run.
        [CompetitionBenchmark]
        public void SlowerX5() => Thread.SpinWait(5 * Count);

        // Competition member #3. Should take ~7x more time to run.
        [CompetitionBenchmark]
        public void SlowerX7() => Thread.SpinWait(7 * Count);
    }

I get the following:

Test completed with errors, details below.
Errors:
    * Run #1: No result reports for benchmarks: Baseline, SlowerX3, SlowerX5, SlowerX7.
at CodeJam.PerfTests.Running.Core.NUnitCompetitionRunner.ReportExecutionErrors(String messages, CompetitionState competitionState) in C:\Users\igors\Source\Repos\CodeJam\PerfTests\src-NUnit\Running.Core\NUnitCompetitionRunner.cs:line 81
at CodeJam.PerfTests.Running.Core.CompetitionRunnerBase.RunCore(Type benchmarkType, ICompetitionConfig competitionConfig, CompetitionFeatures competitionFeatures) in C:\Users\igors\Source\Repos\CodeJam\PerfTests\src\[L5_AllTogether]\Running.Core\CompetitionRunnerBase.cs:line 233



BenchmarkDotNet=v0.10.8, OS=Windows 10 Redstone 1 (10.0.14393)
Processor=Intel Core i7-7700 CPU 3.60GHz (Kaby Lake), ProcessorCount=8
Frequency=3515621 Hz, Resolution=284.4448 ns, Timer=TSC
  [Host] : Clr 4.0.30319.42000, 64bit RyuJIT-v4.7.2558.0

Job=Competition  Force=False  Toolchain=InProcessToolchain  
InvocationCount=256  LaunchCount=1  RunStrategy=Throughput  
TargetCount=256  UnrollFactor=16  WarmupCount=128  
AdjustMetrics=True  

   Method | Mean | StdDev | Scaled | Scaled-StdDev | GcAllocations |
--------- |-----:|-------:|-------:|--------------:|--------------:|
 Baseline |   NA |     NA |   1.00 |          0.00 |             ? |
 SlowerX3 |   NA |     NA |      ? |             ? |             ? |
 SlowerX5 |   NA |     NA |      ? |             ? |             ? |
 SlowerX7 |   NA |     NA |      ? |             ? |             ? |

Benchmarks with issues:
  SimplePerfTest.Baseline: Competition(Force=False, Toolchain=InProcessToolchain, InvocationCount=256, LaunchCount=1, RunStrategy=Throughput, TargetCount=256, UnrollFactor=16, WarmupCount=128)
  SimplePerfTest.SlowerX3: Competition(Force=False, Toolchain=InProcessToolchain, InvocationCount=256, LaunchCount=1, RunStrategy=Throughput, TargetCount=256, UnrollFactor=16, WarmupCount=128)
  SimplePerfTest.SlowerX5: Competition(Force=False, Toolchain=InProcessToolchain, InvocationCount=256, LaunchCount=1, RunStrategy=Throughput, TargetCount=256, UnrollFactor=16, WarmupCount=128)
  SimplePerfTest.SlowerX7: Competition(Force=False, Toolchain=InProcessToolchain, InvocationCount=256, LaunchCount=1, RunStrategy=Throughput, TargetCount=256, UnrollFactor=16, WarmupCount=128)

============= SimplePerfTest =============
// ? Squid.Strategies.Tests.Collect2.SimplePerfTest, Squid.Strategies.Tests

---- Run 1, total runs (expected): 1 -----
ExitCode != 0
No more Benchmark runs will be launched as NO measurements were obtained from the previous run!
// Exception: System.InvalidOperationException: Sequence contains no elements
   at System.Linq.Enumerable.Last[TSource](IEnumerable`1 source)
   at BenchmarkDotNet.Running.BenchmarkRunnerCore.Execute(ILogger logger, Benchmark benchmark, IToolchain toolchain, BuildResult buildResult, IConfig config, IResolver resolver, GcStats& gcStats)
   at BenchmarkDotNet.Running.BenchmarkRunnerCore.Run(Benchmark benchmark, ILogger logger, IConfig config, String rootArtifactsFolderPath, Func`2 toolchainProvider, IResolver resolver)
ExitCode != 0
No more Benchmark runs will be launched as NO measurements were obtained from the previous run!
// Exception: System.InvalidOperationException: Sequence contains no elements
   at System.Linq.Enumerable.Last[TSource](IEnumerable`1 source)
   at BenchmarkDotNet.Running.BenchmarkRunnerCore.Execute(ILogger logger, Benchmark benchmark, IToolchain toolchain, BuildResult buildResult, IConfig config, IResolver resolver, GcStats& gcStats)
   at BenchmarkDotNet.Running.BenchmarkRunnerCore.Run(Benchmark benchmark, ILogger logger, IConfig config, String rootArtifactsFolderPath, Func`2 toolchainProvider, IResolver resolver)
ExitCode != 0
No more Benchmark runs will be launched as NO measurements were obtained from the previous run!
// Exception: System.InvalidOperationException: Sequence contains no elements
   at System.Linq.Enumerable.Last[TSource](IEnumerable`1 source)
   at BenchmarkDotNet.Running.BenchmarkRunnerCore.Execute(ILogger logger, Benchmark benchmark, IToolchain toolchain, BuildResult buildResult, IConfig config, IResolver resolver, GcStats& gcStats)
   at BenchmarkDotNet.Running.BenchmarkRunnerCore.Run(Benchmark benchmark, ILogger logger, IConfig config, String rootArtifactsFolderPath, Func`2 toolchainProvider, IResolver resolver)
ExitCode != 0
No more Benchmark runs will be launched as NO measurements were obtained from the previous run!
// Exception: System.InvalidOperationException: Sequence contains no elements
   at System.Linq.Enumerable.Last[TSource](IEnumerable`1 source)
   at BenchmarkDotNet.Running.BenchmarkRunnerCore.Execute(ILogger logger, Benchmark benchmark, IToolchain toolchain, BuildResult buildResult, IConfig config, IResolver resolver, GcStats& gcStats)
   at BenchmarkDotNet.Running.BenchmarkRunnerCore.Run(Benchmark benchmark, ILogger logger, IConfig config, String rootArtifactsFolderPath, Func`2 toolchainProvider, IResolver resolver)
There are no any results runs
There are no any results runs
There are no any results runs
There are no any results runs
Benchmarks with issues:
  SimplePerfTest.Baseline: Competition(Force=False, Toolchain=InProcessToolchain, InvocationCount=256, LaunchCount=1, RunStrategy=Throughput, TargetCount=256, UnrollFactor=16, WarmupCount=128)
  SimplePerfTest.SlowerX3: Competition(Force=False, Toolchain=InProcessToolchain, InvocationCount=256, LaunchCount=1, RunStrategy=Throughput, TargetCount=256, UnrollFactor=16, WarmupCount=128)
  SimplePerfTest.SlowerX5: Competition(Force=False, Toolchain=InProcessToolchain, InvocationCount=256, LaunchCount=1, RunStrategy=Throughput, TargetCount=256, UnrollFactor=16, WarmupCount=128)
  SimplePerfTest.SlowerX7: Competition(Force=False, Toolchain=InProcessToolchain, InvocationCount=256, LaunchCount=1, RunStrategy=Throughput, TargetCount=256, UnrollFactor=16, WarmupCount=128)
// ! #1.1  01.442s, ExecutionError@Analyser: No result reports for benchmarks: Baseline, SlowerX3, SlowerX5, SlowerX7.
// ! Hint: Ensure that benchmarks were run successfully and did not throw any exceptions.
// ! Breaking competition execution. High severity error occured.

[ig-sinicyn]

@megakid
Oops. Will fix ASAP

[NN---]

Fixed ?

[ig-sinicyn]

AFAIR, I did not push the fix. Current version of perftests in CJ is kinda outdated. Going to update it on next month.

[NN---]

@ig-sinicyn Any progress there ?
I can try updating Benchmark package without solving the issue

[ig-sinicyn]

@NN--- Sorry, I'm kinda out of time. Will try to post fix on weekends.

[NN---]

Updates ? Can I add project to solution ?
It would be nice to build everything and publish help automatically.

[ig-sinicyn]

Yep:)
I've updated the project to the latest BDN and will push final fixes sometime after BDN 10.14 release.
Have almost no free time so there may be a little delay.

[NN---]

I wonder whether we should have different solution and docs project for perftests or not.
Right now the perftest doc is a separate file and needs a separate build.

[NN---]

@ig-sinicyn Check whether you can require lower version for any dependency like NUnit 3.0.0 instead of 3.12 and so on.

[ig-sinicyn]

Yep, perftests will move into separate solution, CJ is stable enough and there's no profit to keep both projects in a single solution.

Check whether you can require lower version for any dependency like NUnit 3.0.0 instead of 3.12 and so on.

Will do.

[NN---]

I guess we will see no progress :(
What is still missing ?

[ig-sinicyn]

TBH, I have almost no free time for this. This summer, may be?:)

[NN---]

I guess there will be no progress here.
Is it still relevant or there is a solution in different library ?

[ig-sinicyn]

Let's close it. Perftest are currently dead as I have no time to revive them:)