diff --git a/FUNCTIONALITY_REVIEW.md b/FUNCTIONALITY_REVIEW.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..97281d0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/FUNCTIONALITY_REVIEW.md
@@ -0,0 +1,435 @@
+# TXTControl Functionality Review
+
+**Date:** 2026-01-01  
+**Version:** 1.0.0  
+**Reviewer:** GitHub Copilot Code Review Agent
+
+---
+
+## Executive Summary
+
+TXTControl is a Python asyncio-based library for controlling the fischertechnik TXT controller. This review analyzes the functionality, code quality, potential issues, and provides recommendations without modifying the code.
+
+**Overall Assessment:** The library provides a well-structured asynchronous API for robotics control with good design patterns, but has several issues that should be addressed before production use.
+
+---
+
+## 1. Architecture and Design
+
+### 1.1 Strengths
+- **Async/await pattern**: Excellent use of Python asyncio for non-blocking I/O operations
+- **Context managers**: Proper use of `async with` for resource management
+- **Factory pattern**: `create()` class methods provide clean initialization
+- **Separation of concerns**: Clear separation between connection management, I/O handling, and device control
+- **Type hints**: Good use of type annotations (though not complete)
+
+### 1.2 Design Concerns
+- **Protected member access**: Heavy reliance on protected members (methods starting with `_`) across classes, which violates encapsulation
+- **Tight coupling**: Classes like Motor, Speaker, etc., directly access TXT's protected methods
+- **Missing buffer abstraction**: The `_Buffer` class is exposed and manipulated directly in multiple places
+
+---
+
+## 2. Core Functionality Analysis
+
+### 2.1 TXT Class (Connection Management)
+
+#### Working Features:
+- ✅ Auto-detection of TXT via multiple network interfaces (USB, WLAN, Bluetooth)
+- ✅ Asynchronous connection establishment
+- ✅ Periodic data exchange with TXT controller
+- ✅ Configuration management for inputs/outputs
+- ✅ Proper async context manager implementation
+
+#### Issues Found:
+
+**CRITICAL:**
+1. **Line 173: Wrong default port**
+   ```python
+   def __init__(self, host=None, port=6500):
+   ```
+   The port should be `65000` (five digits), not `6500`. This is documented correctly in the README but implemented incorrectly. This will cause connection failures.
+
+2. **Line 232: Unreliable data reading**
+   ```python
+   raw_data = await self._reader.read(512)
+   ```
+   Should use `readexactly(512)` to ensure complete data is received. The commented-out line above shows this was known but changed.
+
+3. **Line 181: Uninitialized variable**
+   ```python
+   self.device_version = None  # why isn't is set anywhere?
+   ```
+   The comment acknowledges this is never set, making the return value from `query_status()` incomplete.
+
+**MEDIUM:**
+4. **Line 302: Missing error handler**
+   ```python
+   b.handle_data()
+   ```
+   This method is called but doesn't exist on the `_Buffer` class. This will cause an AttributeError at runtime.
+
+5. **Race condition in `_keep_connection()`**: If `_is_running` is set to False while waiting on `asyncio.sleep()`, the connection might send one more update cycle before stopping.
+
+6. **No timeout handling**: Connection operations lack timeout parameters, which could cause indefinite hangs.
+
+### 2.2 Motor Class
+
+#### Working Features:
+- ✅ Speed control with directional PWM
+- ✅ Distance/position control
+- ✅ Counter-based position tracking
+- ✅ Proper slot management to prevent conflicts
+
+#### Issues Found:
+
+**LOW:**
+1. **No speed validation**: Speed values aren't clamped to valid ranges (0-512). Invalid values could be sent to the hardware.
+2. **No distance validation**: Distance can be set to any integer value without validation.
+3. **Thread safety**: No locks around property setters that modify shared TXT buffer state.
+
+### 2.3 SyncedMotor Class
+
+#### Working Features:
+- ✅ Synchronization of two motors
+- ✅ Unified control interface
+
+#### Issues Found:
+
+**MEDIUM:**
+1. **No validation**: Doesn't check if m1 and m2 are on the same TXT controller.
+2. **Incomplete sync check**: The `finished` property requires both motors to finish, but desync issues aren't detected.
+
+### 2.4 Output Class
+
+#### Working Features:
+- ✅ PWM-based output control
+- ✅ Slot management with sub-slot support
+
+#### Issues Found:
+
+**MEDIUM:**
+1. **Line 683: Logic error**
+   ```python
+   else:
+       TXTError(f"Output slot {port} is already used!")
+   ```
+   Missing `raise` keyword. This creates an exception object but doesn't throw it, allowing duplicate slot usage.
+
+2. **Level validation**: No validation that level is between 0-512.
+
+### 2.5 Input Classes (Button, Resistor, Ultrasonic, Voltage, ColorSensor, TrailFollower)
+
+#### Working Features:
+- ✅ Proper inheritance hierarchy
+- ✅ Configuration-based input type selection
+- ✅ Specialized sensor interpretations (temperature, color, etc.)
+
+#### Issues Found:
+
+**MEDIUM:**
+1. **Line 788: Division by zero potential**
+   ```python
+   if value == 0:
+       raise TXTError("Invalid input value 0 for ntc-temperature calculation.")
+   ```
+   Good error handling, but could provide better guidance on what causes this.
+
+2. **ColorSensor thresholds**: Hard-coded thresholds (200, 1000) may not work for all lighting conditions. Should be configurable or documented.
+
+3. **TrailFollower analog/digital confusion**: Comment on line 831 questions why it's analog. This suggests uncertainty about the implementation.
+
+### 2.6 Speaker Class
+
+#### Working Features:
+- ✅ Sound playback with repeat support
+- ✅ Sound completion detection
+- ✅ Async wait for completion
+
+#### Issues Found:
+
+**LOW:**
+1. **No validation**: `repeat` parameter isn't validated (should be positive integer).
+2. **Sound enum validation**: No check that `sound` is a valid Sound enum value.
+
+### 2.7 Camera Class
+
+#### Working Features:
+- ✅ Async camera stream handling
+- ✅ Frame buffering
+- ✅ Connection retry logic
+
+#### Issues Found:
+
+**MEDIUM:**
+1. **Line 992: Fixed retry limit**
+   ```python
+   while attempts <= 150 and not self._stop_event.is_set():
+   ```
+   150 attempts * 0.02s = 3 seconds timeout. This is hardcoded and not configurable.
+
+2. **Memory concern**: `_frame_data` grows with each frame but no size limit or cleanup for old frames.
+
+3. **No frame rate control**: Camera runs at maximum speed without throttling options.
+
+---
+
+## 3. Error Handling
+
+### 3.1 Strengths
+- Custom exception hierarchy (`TXTError`, `TXTConnectionError`)
+- Validation checks for slot conflicts
+- Protocol validation (response ID checking)
+
+### 3.2 Weaknesses
+1. **Inconsistent error handling**: Some methods validate inputs, others don't
+2. **Network errors**: No retry logic for transient network failures
+3. **Resource cleanup**: If initialization fails, resources may not be properly cleaned up
+4. **Timeout handling**: Missing timeouts could lead to hanging connections
+
+---
+
+## 4. Code Quality Issues
+
+### 4.1 Critical Issues
+1. **Line 173**: Wrong port number (6500 vs 65000)
+2. **Line 302**: Call to non-existent `handle_data()` method
+3. **Line 683**: Missing `raise` keyword
+
+### 4.2 Style and Convention Issues
+1. **Inconsistent docstrings**: Some methods have detailed docstrings, others have none
+2. **TODO comments**: Lines 37, 181, 245 contain unresolved TODOs
+3. **Magic numbers**: Many hardcoded values (0x163FF61D, 512, etc.) without named constants
+4. **Long methods**: `_keep_connection()` and `update_config()` are complex and hard to test
+5. **Comment quality**: Line 126 ("Yes, I spammed these zeros by myself. 110 times!") is unprofessional
+
+### 4.3 Type Annotations
+- Missing return type annotations on many methods
+- Some parameters lack type hints
+- `Any` used in `used_input_slots` could be more specific
+
+---
+
+## 5. Protocol and Network Communication
+
+### 5.1 Strengths
+- Proper struct packing/unpacking for binary protocol
+- Response validation with expected IDs
+- Async/await for non-blocking I/O
+
+### 5.2 Concerns
+1. **Buffer size assumptions**: All responses expected to be exactly 512 bytes
+2. **No protocol versioning**: Changes to TXT firmware could break compatibility
+3. **Endianness**: Assumes little-endian (`<` in struct format strings) without documentation
+4. **Magic numbers**: Protocol constants (message IDs, response IDs) are not documented
+
+---
+
+## 6. Testing and Validation
+
+### 6.1 Current State
+- ⚠️ **No test files found**: The repository contains no unit tests
+- ⚠️ **No integration tests**: No tests for actual hardware communication
+- ⚠️ **Untested by author**: README warns that the program hasn't been tested due to broken hardware
+
+### 6.2 Testing Recommendations
+1. Add unit tests for:
+   - Auto-detection logic
+   - Buffer manipulation
+   - Input/output configuration
+   - Error handling paths
+2. Add mock tests for protocol communication
+3. Add integration tests with hardware simulation
+4. Add property-based tests for value validation
+
+---
+
+## 7. Documentation Review
+
+### 7.1 README.md Analysis
+
+**Strengths:**
+- Clear motivation and comparison with ftrobopy
+- Comprehensive API reference
+- Good example code
+- Warning about untested status
+
+**Issues:**
+1. **Inconsistency**: Port documented as 65000 but code uses 6500
+2. **Missing examples**: No examples for Camera, ColorSensor, TrailFollower
+3. **Type information**: Some return types are marked as TODO (line 245)
+4. **Context manager example**: Shows both `async with` and `with` (line 36), but only `async with` is correct
+
+### 7.2 Docstring Analysis
+- **Inconsistent coverage**: Some classes well-documented, others minimal
+- **Missing parameter descriptions**: Many methods lack Args documentation
+- **Missing return types**: Several methods don't document what they return
+- **Missing exceptions**: Exception cases aren't documented
+
+---
+
+## 8. Security Considerations
+
+### 8.1 Identified Issues
+1. **No authentication**: Connection to TXT has no authentication mechanism
+2. **Network exposure**: Auto-detection tries multiple IPs without security checks
+3. **Buffer overflow potential**: No validation of incoming data sizes beyond struct unpacking
+4. **Command injection**: Motor/sound commands lack validation, could send arbitrary values
+
+### 8.2 Recommendations
+1. Add input validation for all user-provided values
+2. Document security model and network requirements
+3. Add rate limiting for command sending
+4. Validate all incoming data sizes before processing
+
+---
+
+## 9. Performance Considerations
+
+### 9.1 Observations
+1. **Update interval**: 0.02s (50Hz) is hardcoded, not tunable
+2. **Lock contention**: Single connection lock could become a bottleneck
+3. **Memory allocation**: Many list allocations in hot paths (`_Buffer.as_fields`)
+4. **Async overhead**: Many small async operations might have overhead
+
+### 9.2 Recommendations
+1. Make update interval configurable
+2. Consider using asyncio queues for command batching
+3. Reuse buffer objects instead of creating new ones
+4. Profile performance with actual hardware
+
+---
+
+## 10. API Design and Usability
+
+### 10.1 Strengths
+- ✅ Clean, Pythonic API
+- ✅ Async-friendly design
+- ✅ Good use of properties for state access
+- ✅ Factory methods for initialization
+- ✅ Enum for sound selection
+- ✅ Context managers for resource management
+
+### 10.2 Weaknesses
+1. **Inconsistent patterns**: Some classes use `create()`, others don't
+2. **Mixed synchronous/async**: Property setters are sync but have side effects on async operations
+3. **No async motor operations**: Setting speed is immediate, not awaitable
+4. **Limited feedback**: No way to query if commands were acknowledged
+5. **No event system**: Changes in input states don't trigger callbacks
+
+---
+
+## 11. Compatibility and Dependencies
+
+### 11.1 Requirements
+- Python 3.13+ required (very new, limits adoption)
+- No external dependencies (good for simplicity)
+- Linux/Unix assumed (uses asyncio networking)
+
+### 11.2 Concerns
+1. **Python 3.13 requirement**: Very recent, most users still on 3.10-3.12
+2. **No Windows testing**: Networking code may behave differently on Windows
+3. **No dependency locking**: No requirements.txt or poetry.lock
+
+---
+
+## 12. Known Issues Summary
+
+### Critical (Must Fix Before Use)
+1. ❌ **Wrong port number** (line 173): 6500 should be 65000
+2. ❌ **Missing method** (line 302): `handle_data()` doesn't exist
+3. ❌ **Missing raise** (line 683): Exception not thrown
+
+### High Priority
+1. ⚠️ **Uninitialized device_version** (line 181)
+2. ⚠️ **Unreliable data reading** (line 232)
+3. ⚠️ **No input validation** across multiple classes
+
+### Medium Priority
+1. 🔍 Protocol robustness (timeouts, retries)
+2. 🔍 Thread safety for property setters
+3. 🔍 Better error messages
+4. 🔍 Configuration validation
+
+### Low Priority
+1. 📝 Incomplete documentation
+2. 📝 Code style inconsistencies
+3. 📝 TODO comments
+4. 📝 Missing type hints
+
+---
+
+## 13. Recommendations
+
+### 13.1 Immediate Actions (Before First Use)
+1. **Fix the port number bug** (line 173)
+2. **Remove or implement `handle_data()` call** (line 302)
+3. **Add `raise` keyword** (line 683)
+4. **Test with actual hardware** to validate protocol implementation
+5. **Add input validation** for all user-facing parameters
+
+### 13.2 Short-term Improvements
+1. Add comprehensive unit tests
+2. Add timeout parameters to all network operations
+3. Implement proper error recovery and retries
+4. Add logging for debugging
+5. Validate all numeric inputs (speeds, distances, levels)
+6. Set `device_version` in `query_status()`
+7. Use `readexactly()` for reliable data reading
+
+### 13.3 Long-term Enhancements
+1. Add callback/event system for input changes
+2. Implement command queueing and batching
+3. Add configuration file support
+4. Create example projects
+5. Add hardware simulator for testing
+6. Consider supporting Python 3.10+ for wider adoption
+7. Add performance profiling and optimization
+8. Create comprehensive documentation site
+
+---
+
+## 14. Positive Aspects
+
+Despite the issues found, the library has many strengths:
+
+1. ✨ **Modern Python**: Excellent use of asyncio, type hints, and modern Python features
+2. ✨ **Clean API**: Intuitive and easy to use compared to ftrobopy
+3. ✨ **Good architecture**: Clear separation of concerns and modular design
+4. ✨ **Comprehensive features**: Covers all major TXT controller capabilities
+5. ✨ **Well-documented**: README provides clear usage examples
+6. ✨ **Good intentions**: Author's motivation to create a better alternative is evident
+
+---
+
+## 15. Conclusion
+
+TXTControl is a promising library with a solid foundation and modern design. However, it has several critical bugs that must be fixed before it can be safely used:
+
+1. The incorrect port number will prevent connection
+2. The missing `handle_data()` method will cause runtime crashes
+3. The missing `raise` keyword allows invalid states
+
+**Verdict:** ⚠️ **Not production-ready** due to critical bugs and untested status, but with fixes and testing, it could become a valuable tool for fischertechnik TXT users.
+
+**Recommendation:** Fix the three critical bugs, add basic tests, validate with actual hardware, and release as an alpha version for community testing and feedback.
+
+---
+
+## 16. Detailed Issue Reference
+
+| Line | Severity | Issue | Impact |
+|------|----------|-------|--------|
+| 37 | Low | TODO comment about input type | Uncertainty in implementation |
+| 173 | Critical | Wrong port: 6500 vs 65000 | Connection failure |
+| 181 | Medium | device_version never set | Incomplete return value |
+| 232 | High | read() instead of readexactly() | Potential data corruption |
+| 302 | Critical | Call to non-existent handle_data() | Runtime crash |
+| 683 | Critical | Missing raise keyword | Silent failure |
+| 788 | Low | Generic error message | Poor user experience |
+| 831 | Low | Uncertain about analog/digital | Needs clarification |
+| 992 | Medium | Hardcoded timeout | Inflexible behavior |
+
+---
+
+**End of Review**