Formalize `is_dormant` in the admin.conversations.search method

[Keanro]

Slack Support Request 6737422 response

The is_dormant field essentially helps identify inactive channels. Although it is currently visible, it is not part of our documented schema. Because of this, we can’t guarantee its consistency or availability, and we wouldn’t recommend relying on it for any production use.
I wanted to clarify that our API documentation is the most accurate and up-to-date source we can commit to regarding which fields are included in API responses. While there are a few factors that can influence what is returned in certain cases, only the fields outlined in the documentation are officially supported.

It would be great if the is_dormant field became a formally supported field in the response and if we could understand a bit more as what is considered dormant and how many days.

Category (place an x in each of the [ ])

• slack_sdk.web.WebClient (sync/async) (Web API client)
• slack_sdk.webhook.WebhookClient (sync/async) (Incoming Webhook, response_url sender)
• slack_sdk.models (UI component builders)
• slack_sdk.oauth (OAuth Flow Utilities)
• slack_sdk.socket_mode (Socket Mode client)
• slack_sdk.audit_logs (Audit Logs API client)
• slack_sdk.scim (SCIM API client)
• slack_sdk.rtm (RTM client)
• slack_sdk.signature (Request Signature Verifier)

Requirements

Please read the Contributing guidelines and Code of Conduct before creating this issue or pull request. By submitting, you are agreeing to those rules.

[zimeg]

👋 Hey @Keanro! Thanks for sharing this with us 📚

I'm not so familiar with the expected responses of the admin.conversations.search method but find as well that it's not documented "is_dormant" at the moment.

This SDK doesn't have formal response shapes I understand so we might favor the active support request on bringing this to public documentation for the meantime 👾 ✨