-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 170
fix(fs): exclude ignored file in key listing #622
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
odzhychko
wants to merge
1
commit into
unjs:main
Choose a base branch
from
odzhychko:main
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+36
−3
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have a feeling some old patterns could only cover
entry.namebut not sure without testing. to be on safe side, we could check both.Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The fix as proposed is indeed breaking for some patterns.
For example, the pattern
"ignored.txt"currently would exclude the file"{base}/dir/ignored.txt"from key listings. But after the fix, the pattern would need to be changed to"**/ignored.txt".One could argue that excluding
"{base}/dir/ignored.txt"because of the pattern"ignored.txt"is also a bug (with the same cause as #621) because this pattern does not exclude the file from being watched. The following example shows the pattern having an effect onstorage.getKeysbut not onstorage.watch.Whether what I describe can be considered a bug or just an inconsistent feature worth maintaining backwards compatibility for, is something for you to decide. Please let me know what you decided, and I will make the appropriate change.
My opinion is that backwards compatibility could be maintained without impeding intended usage. Usually, patterns should always start with
"**"or"/"because the ignore patterns are applied to an absolute path. But if someone nevertheless just used the file name (e.g.,"ignored.txt") and it worked, the current behavior could be maintained (maybe until the next major version) by checkingentry.namein addition toentryPath.