Conversation
Signed-off-by: John McCarten <jmccarten@wetafx.co.nz>
|
|
||
| A human is required. | ||
|
|
||
| PRs generated without an identifiable human author will be immediately closed and the source account banned from the project. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Banned is possibly too strong, soften the terms, give a warning potentially, hold the PR back for further review. "We reserve the right to ban accounts if repeated or egregious violation on a case by case basis".
Apply to any violation not just AI policy.
Reword to assume good intent?
|
|
||
| If AI was used, it is *mandatory* that the commit must disclose via 'Assisted-by' followed by the tool used and a brief description of what it was used for: | ||
|
|
||
| ```Assisted-by: anthropic-claude-connet-4.6 - Generated tests for Model input processing``` |
|
|
||
| ## Disclosure | ||
|
|
||
| If AI was used, it is *mandatory* that the commit must disclose via 'Assisted-by' followed by the tool used and a brief description of what it was used for: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Commit hooks to check for format - possibly validate model names.
Consider any use of AI even if not generative?
Mandatory to disclose if artifact makes it into repo, optional disclosure if use of AI for introspection or non generative tasks.
|
|
||
| Regardless of how the code was created - only humans can submit PRs. Only humans can review PRs. Obly humans can commit them to the repository. | ||
|
|
||
| A human is required. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
A human should understand what is in the code and how it works (avoid pure vibe coding).
There should be a trail of involvement of a human in the development - specifications, plans, slack discussions.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Updates to issues as an example of involment
|
|
||
| ## Graduated adoption | ||
|
|
||
| RMTC is an early stage project - it's code and community examples not yet established enough to allow for an AI to generate complementary code. Additionally, it is not clear regarding the possibility for reconstruction of license violating material for burgenoning projects which poses a specific issue for RMTC due to it's aims for responsible AI usage. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| RMTC is an early stage project - it's code and community examples not yet established enough to allow for an AI to generate complementary code. Additionally, it is not clear regarding the possibility for reconstruction of license violating material for burgenoning projects which poses a specific issue for RMTC due to it's aims for responsible AI usage. | |
| RMTC is an early stage project - its code and community examples not yet established enough to allow for an AI to generate complementary code. Additionally, it is not clear regarding the possibility for reconstruction of license violating material for burgenoning projects which poses a specific issue for RMTC due to its aims for responsible AI usage. |
|
|
||
| ## Graduated adoption | ||
|
|
||
| RMTC is an early stage project - it's code and community examples not yet established enough to allow for an AI to generate complementary code. Additionally, it is not clear regarding the possibility for reconstruction of license violating material for burgenoning projects which poses a specific issue for RMTC due to it's aims for responsible AI usage. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Phase 2-5 a little fine grained, maybe make more general - what is 'minor' vs 'major'?
Consider difference between policy and application - case by case?
Important for gradual adoption for greenfield project.
A little control is good.
These are intended to guide our AI usage not hard rules
Consider in Phase 1
|
|
||
| ## AI usage definition | ||
|
|
||
| AI has been used for sometime in software development, from code suggestions to spell checking. What does this policy cover? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
'some time' is a period of time; 'sometime' is a specific point in time
| AI has been used for sometime in software development, from code suggestions to spell checking. What does this policy cover? | |
| AI has been used for some time in software development, from code suggestions to spell checking. What does this policy cover? |
|
|
||
| - Using it to query, summarise or review the code but not generate an artifact for PR | ||
| - Spell checking | ||
| - Traditional line code completion (<10lines) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove lines reference - remove line counts as too arbitrary
4 participants
No description provided.