Skip to content

feat: Bitpacked Trio 16-bit layout [u16; 3] for O(1) graph traversal#66

Open
AdaWorldAPI wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
feat/bitpacked-trio-layout
Open

feat: Bitpacked Trio 16-bit layout [u16; 3] for O(1) graph traversal#66
AdaWorldAPI wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
feat/bitpacked-trio-layout

Conversation

@AdaWorldAPI
Copy link
Owner

The Structural Foundation

This defines the 16-bit address layout required for the Bitpacked Trio architecture:

Edge Triple: [Node_u16, Edge_u16, Node_u16] = 48 bits
With padding: 64 bits = perfect cache line alignment

Address Space (65,536 total)

Zone Prefix Count Purpose
OPS 0x00-0x0F 4,096 Instruction set, prefix executes
0x0C-0x0E 768 USER RESERVED
0x0F:XX 256 Learned/custom thinking styles
FLUID 0x10-0x3F 12,288 Registers, cache, crystal, stack
EDGES 0x40-0x7F 16,384 Relationship envelope [Node, EDGE, Node]
NODES 0x80-0xFF 32,768 Dn tree topology [NODE, Edge, NODE]

Why NOT u24

  • No hardware u24 → pay for u32 or burn cycles masking
  • Breaks [u16; 3] alignment → kills AVX-512 throughput
  • Scale via Shard_ID: [Shard_u16 | Local_u16] not wider pointers

Key Features

  • EdgeTriple struct: 64-bit aligned, pack/unpack for AVX-512
  • Dn tree addressing: Tree.Branch.Twig.Leaf with 2^4 branching
  • Hamming distance = topological distance (XOR + popcount)
  • Sublanguage support: SQL/CQL, Cypher/GQL, NARS/ACT-R slot subdivision
  • User reserved: 0x0C-0x0E for custom extensions
  • Learned styles: 256 slots at 0x0F for custom cognition

Removes

  • Grammar Layer (NSM, Templates, Speech Acts) - moved to user space or edges
  • Old SURFACE/FLUID/NODE naming → OPS/FLUID/EDGES/NODES

Defines the structural foundation for [u16; 3] edge format:
- OPS: 0x00-0x0F (4K) - ops + 256 learned styles + user reserved
- FLUID: 0x10-0x3F (12K) - registers/cache/crystal
- EDGES: 0x40-0x7F (16K) - relationship envelope
- NODES: 0x80-0xFF (32K) - Dn tree topology

Includes EdgeTriple type for 64-bit aligned AVX-512 processing.
@chatgpt-codex-connector
Copy link

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.
To continue using code reviews, you can upgrade your account or add credits to your account and enable them for code reviews in your settings.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant