Skip to content

Add support for CO2 emissions compsets with CAM7#4068

Open
klindsay28 wants to merge 1 commit into
ESCOMP:masterfrom
klindsay28:co2_emissions
Open

Add support for CO2 emissions compsets with CAM7#4068
klindsay28 wants to merge 1 commit into
ESCOMP:masterfrom
klindsay28:co2_emissions

Conversation

@klindsay28
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Description of changes

Use prognostic CO2 in CO2 emissions compsets with CAM7.

Specific notes

Contributors other than yourself, if any:

  • none

CTSM issues resolved or otherwise addressed, if any:

  • There is not a corresponding CTSM issue for this.

If answers are expected to change, describe (delete this line otherwise):
Answers change in CO2 emissions compsets with CAM7, which are
under development and not in use yet.

Any user interface changes (namelist or namelist defaults changes)?
Changes co2_type to 'prognostic' in CO2 emissions compsets with CAM7.

Testing planned or performed, if any:
ERS_Ld5 and SMS_D_Ld2 tests in an 1850 CO2 emissions compsets with CAM7 pass.

Requirements before merge:

  • The code in this PR branch builds with no errors.
  • The code in this PR branch runs with no errors. Briefly describe tested configuration(s):
  • This either (a) does not change answers, (b) it only changes answers at roundoff level, or (c) I have performed a scientific evaluation of the answer changes. Which?:
    This only changes answers in CO2 emissions compsets with CAM7,
    which have not been vetted yet. This PR is a step towards enabling them.
  • I have reviewed relevant parts of the CLM documentation Tech Note or User's Guide to determine if anything needs to be changed or added. If it does, describe:
  • This PR either (a) does not create a need to update the documentation or (b) includes required documentation updates (see guidelines for contributing documentation). Which?:

@wwieder wwieder requested a review from ekluzek May 29, 2026 22:30
@wwieder wwieder added b4b bit-for-bit science Enhancement to or bug impacting science labels May 29, 2026
@wwieder wwieder added this to the cesm3_0_beta10 milestone May 29, 2026
@wwieder
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

wwieder commented May 29, 2026

Thanks @klindsay28 , will there be additional changes to CMEPS or other submodules that we need to bring in?

@ekluzek this one-liner seems simple enough, but there may be additional infrastructure / testing we need to support?

@wwieder wwieder added priority: high High priority to fix/merge soon, e.g., because it is a problem in important configurations next this should get some attention in the next week or two. Normally each Thursday SE meeting. labels May 29, 2026
@klindsay28
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

I submitted a 1-line PR to CMEPS today, ESCOMP/CMEPS#658.
That one, like this one, is only relevant for fully coupled CO2 emissions compsets with CAM7.
So I imagine that you'll ultimately pull in an updated CMEPS that has this,
but I don't think it will matter to non-CESM clones of CTSM.
(This statement is based on my understanding that non-CESM clones of CTSM are for
running CTSM only composts, i.e. not fully coupled compsets.)

There are also changes to CAM and MOM_interface, but it doesn't look like these are submodules of CTSM.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

b4b bit-for-bit next this should get some attention in the next week or two. Normally each Thursday SE meeting. priority: high High priority to fix/merge soon, e.g., because it is a problem in important configurations science Enhancement to or bug impacting science

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants