Skip to content

⚡ Optimize trading simulation loop performance#89

Open
EiJackGH wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
optimize-simulation-loop-7117545161533435446
Open

⚡ Optimize trading simulation loop performance#89
EiJackGH wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
optimize-simulation-loop-7117545161533435446

Conversation

@EiJackGH
Copy link
Owner

@EiJackGH EiJackGH commented Mar 8, 2026

💡 What: Replaced the pandas .iterrows() loop and .loc[] scalar assignments in simulate_trading with an iteration over numpy arrays (.values), maintaining internal state using standard Python variables (cash, btc), and storing loop results in Python lists before assigning them collectively to the resulting portfolio DataFrame.

🎯 Why: The iterative assignment with pandas .loc[] in a tight loop is an anti-pattern known to be exceptionally slow because it carries significant DataFrame overhead (re-indexing, bounds checking, potential type coercion) for every individual cell modification.

📊 Measured Improvement:

  • Baseline: On a 100,000-day simulation dataset, the original simulate_trading function took ~105.7 seconds.
  • Improvement: The optimized numpy/list implementation reduced the processing time to ~0.14 seconds.
  • Net Result: This is a ~750x performance boost. The logic remains purely sequential (path-dependent) and functional parity has been fully verified via the unit tests (pytest).

PR created automatically by Jules for task 7117545161533435446 started by @EiJackGH

Co-authored-by: EiJackGH <172181576+EiJackGH@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Contributor

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

Co-authored-by: EiJackGH <172181576+EiJackGH@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant