Skip to content

docs: README supply-chain badge → 'secure' [failproofai-394]#393

Merged
NiveditJain merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
luv-supply-chain-badge
May 28, 2026
Merged

docs: README supply-chain badge → 'secure' [failproofai-394]#393
NiveditJain merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
luv-supply-chain-badge

Conversation

@NiveditJain
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What

Change the README supply chain badge from the live OSV-Scanner workflow-status badge (which renders passing) to a static supply chain: secure badge — still linked to the workflow runs.

Why

"secure" reads as a posture statement, which is the intent here. shields.io's GitHub Actions status endpoint can only render the run state (passing/failing), so the custom word requires a static badge.

Trade-off

A static badge won't auto-flip to red if a future scan breaks. The real enforcement remains the OSV-Scanner gate as a required status check on main (block-on-any-finding), and the badge still links to the live workflow runs so current status is verifiable.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Replace the live OSV-Scanner workflow-status badge (which renders 'passing') with a static 'supply chain: secure' badge, kept linked to the workflow runs so the claim stays verifiable. The OSV gate as a required check is the actual enforcement.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai Bot commented May 28, 2026

Warning

Review limit reached

@NiveditJain, we couldn't start this review because you've reached your PR review rate limit.

More reviews will be available in 4 minutes and 55 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work.

Your organization has run out of usage credits. Purchase more in the billing tab.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans include higher PR review limits than trial, open-source, and free plans. In all cases, reviews become available again over time. During sustained high-volume PR review activity, CodeRabbit may temporarily slow when the next review becomes available.

Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: bf88e2c7-2ee9-47ca-a44c-84ba24dbfb70

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 317f74f and 26c51c9.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • CHANGELOG.md
  • README.md

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@NiveditJain NiveditJain merged commit 6a4ef4d into main May 28, 2026
11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant