Conversation
Brings coverage from 93.4% to 100%. set_FFTPROD was tested by direct FFTPROD[] mutation instead of through the function; extraunsafe_view and its unsafe_reindex/get_index_wo_boundcheck helpers had no tests. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #25 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 93.41% 100.00% +6.58%
===========================================
Files 1 1
Lines 243 242 -1
===========================================
+ Hits 227 242 +15
+ Misses 16 0 -16 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
set_FFTPRODtestset that exercises the function body (previously onlyFFTPROD[]was mutated directly in tests)extraunsafe_viewtestset covering all fourunsafe_reindexdispatch cases (UnitRange, scalar/dropped-dimension, AbstractArray, empty-tuple base case) andget_index_wo_boundcheckResult
Coverage: 93.4% → 100% (240/240 lines), 332 tests passing (up from 327).
Test plan
Pkg.test()passes locally🤖 Generated with Claude Code