Conversation
Added license information to the AI contributions policy.
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #5232 +/- ##
===========================================
- Coverage 93.83% 93.81% -0.03%
===========================================
Files 180 180
Lines 22475 22475
Branches 3190 3190
===========================================
- Hits 21090 21085 -5
- Misses 923 926 +3
- Partials 462 464 +2 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
@RMeli @tylerjereddy @BradyAJohnston - I will need your approvals before I can merge this, since you have all contributed to the text. |
Co-authored-by: Rocco Meli <r.meli@bluemail.ch>
tylerjereddy
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Sounds good.
By the way, similar policy discussions have started for NumPy and SciPy now. I can't really keep up, but the SciPy PR is here: scipy/scipy#24583.
There's a link to the LLVM AI policy there too. I believe the NumPy mailing list discussion was particularly long: https://mail.python.org/archives/list/numpy-discussion@python.org/thread/LAR7P3KQWHWAIKYSHTS2MY7X4HUBVA3L/#XPPHA3EQDIIYOWCIPL3FBOEG335TR4FW
Also, separate discussions about adding agents files to repos to tell LLMs what to do/not do: https://discuss.scientific-python.org/t/agents-md-and-claude-md-addition-to-scipy-repository/2233
I would like to propose that the AI policy is placed under CC-BY-4.0. It would be useful for downstream projects.
LLM/AI disclosure
No AI was used here.
PR Checklist
package/CHANGELOGfile updated?package/AUTHORS? (If it is not, add it!)Developers Certificate of Origin
I certify that I can submit this code contribution as described in the Developer Certificate of Origin, under the MDAnalysis LICENSE.
📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://mdanalysis--5232.org.readthedocs.build/en/5232/