Skip to content

feat(dpf): Upgrade DPF to 26.4 build with bfb 3.4.0#1706

Open
abvarshney-nv wants to merge 1 commit into
NVIDIA:mainfrom
abvarshney-nv:dpf_26.4_upgrade
Open

feat(dpf): Upgrade DPF to 26.4 build with bfb 3.4.0#1706
abvarshney-nv wants to merge 1 commit into
NVIDIA:mainfrom
abvarshney-nv:dpf_26.4_upgrade

Conversation

@abvarshney-nv
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

Upgrade DPF to 26.4 build with bfb 3.4.0

Type of Change

  • Add - New feature or capability
  • Change - Changes in existing functionality
  • Fix - Bug fixes
  • Remove - Removed features or deprecated functionality
  • Internal - Internal changes (refactoring, tests, docs, etc.)

Related Issues (Optional)

Breaking Changes

  • This PR contains breaking changes

Testing

  • Unit tests added/updated
  • Integration tests added/updated
  • Manual testing performed
  • No testing required (docs, internal refactor, etc.)

Additional Notes

@abvarshney-nv abvarshney-nv requested a review from a team as a code owner May 15, 2026 05:31
@abvarshney-nv abvarshney-nv marked this pull request as draft May 15, 2026 05:31
@copy-pr-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

copy-pr-bot Bot commented May 15, 2026

Auto-sync is disabled for draft pull requests in this repository. Workflows must be run manually.

Contributors can view more details about this message here.

@abvarshney-nv abvarshney-nv force-pushed the dpf_26.4_upgrade branch 6 times, most recently from 9294e13 to 4749a3d Compare May 20, 2026 13:42
@abvarshney-nv abvarshney-nv marked this pull request as ready for review May 20, 2026 15:44
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@vasrem vasrem left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Comment thread crates/dpf/src/types.rs
Comment on lines +312 to +314
DpuStatusPhase::PerformArmForceRestart => {
Self::NotUsed("PerformArmForceRestart".into())
}
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this is part of provisioning (related to secure boot AFAICT) wondering why we moved it under NotUsed

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Here NotUsed means, the state is not where Carbide should take some action.
If it is related to SecureBoot, we. might have to do more changes than just this one.

Comment thread crates/dpf/Makefile.toml Outdated

fn default_dpf_bfb_url() -> String {
"https://content.mellanox.com/BlueField/BFBs/Ubuntu24.04/bf-bundle-3.2.1-34_25.11_ubuntu-24.04_64k_prod.bfb".to_string()
"https://content.mellanox.com/BlueField/BFBs/Ubuntu24.04/bf-bundle-3.2.2-125_26.02_ubuntu-24.04_64k_prod.bfb".to_string()
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We are testing against BFB 3.4 with QA. TBD for support with BFB 3.2.x. We will circle back on this soon.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants