Skip to content

docs: update wake word + roadmap for hark PR #19#8

Merged
0xharkirat merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feature/wake-word-robustness-docs
Apr 12, 2026
Merged

docs: update wake word + roadmap for hark PR #19#8
0xharkirat merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feature/wake-word-robustness-docs

Conversation

@0xharkirat
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Docs site refresh reflecting wake word robustness shipping in hark#19.

  • wake-word.mdx: rewritten around the shipped foreground service architecture. New sections: architecture flow diagram showing `WakeWordService → showSession() → HarkSession → OverlayActivity`, User Controls (notification, Stop action, permissions), Lifecycle, and What's Next.
  • hark/architecture.mdx: replaced the "background service support (Phase 2) will allow detection when the app is fully closed" paragraph with the shipped flow.
  • roadmap.mdx: moved wake word robustness + overlay launch + lifecycle refresh to Shipped. Replaced stale In Progress items (self-hosted, BYOK, Gemma 4) with current priorities (Settings screen, action chips, wake word polish, STT, release packaging). Added a Deferred section with rationale.

Test plan

  • All three files parse as valid MDX
  • Preview deploy renders correctly

- wake-word.mdx: rewritten around the shipped foreground service
  architecture (WakeWordService, showSession(), Stop action) and added
  a Lifecycle + User Controls section.
- architecture.mdx: replaced the "Phase 2 planned" wake word paragraph
  with the shipped FG service + VIS.showSession() overlay launch flow.
- roadmap.mdx: moved wake word robustness + overlay launch + lifecycle
  refresh to Shipped. Replaced stale "self-hosted / BYOK / Gemma 4"
  in-progress bullets with current priorities (Settings, action chips,
  wake word polish, STT, release packaging) and a Deferred section.
@0xharkirat 0xharkirat merged commit ea02ebe into main Apr 12, 2026
0 of 3 checks passed
@0xharkirat 0xharkirat deleted the feature/wake-word-robustness-docs branch April 12, 2026 09:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant