Skip to content

Conversation

@justdeok
Copy link

Summary

Fixed a logic error in assertContainAll where it was validating the expected string against itself instead of the actual output.

Key Changes

  • Corrected the receiver in assertContainAll from other to this.
  • Updated mismatched tests accordingly.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 30, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 0.00%. Comparing base (115ed29) to head (5099b57).
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master   #1573    +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage    0.00%   0.00%            
=======================================
  Files         813     838    +25     
  Lines       31466   31795   +329     
  Branches     3614    3622     +8     
=======================================
- Misses      31466   31795   +329     
Flag Coverage Δ
cubrid 0.00% <ø> (?)
db2 0.00% <ø> (?)
embedded 0.00% <ø> (?)
examples 0.00% <ø> (?)
firebird 0.00% <ø> (?)
mongodb 0.00% <ø> (?)
mysql 0.00% <ø> (?)
oracle 0.00% <ø> (?)
postgresql 0.00% <ø> (?)
test 0.00% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant