Open
Conversation
Y2Kwastaken
force-pushed
the
feat/infstack-flex
branch
from
b0294fc to
bf0cb72
Compare
The-Epic
approved these changes
Jan 28, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I was utilizing this API and I noticed some drawbacks. You can't fit partial InfStack into an already existing InfStack its a true or false boolean. I added a fit method to address this. This also lead me to discover InfStack's are force updated, given that these updates are needlessly expensive if no one is viewing their display I added an ability through the InfStack to force InfStack's to be manually updated.
Also probing maybe it might be smart to have a default InfInventory class to use considering that is a common use for this API I think it might be in scope.