chore: update ruff.toml#13
Open
AlessandroMiola wants to merge 3 commits intoPythonBiellaGroup:mainfrom
Open
Conversation
Member
|
Ciao @AlessandroMiola! Sorry, I saw your merge request now, I have updated the version of Bear with ruff and uv. Can you check if it's still ok? :) |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary:
ruff.tomlby nesting linter-specific configs under[lint](and related); though it would work (or, actually, works) the way it currently is, the proposed one could be a preferable/more future-proof option in sight of the upcoming deprecation of top-level lint settings discussed in[tool.ruff.lint]usage in docs is inconsistent astral-sh/ruff#8449 or Deprecate top-level lint options astral-sh/ruff#7651fixable = ["ALL"]is the default already as per https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/settings/#fixable. In my understanding,fixableshould be rather used to specify those rules - among the ones to be checked - that one wants to autofix as well (provided that an autofix is available and not unsafe)ignorelistcookiecutterdirectoryPS: I'm not sure I correctly followed the contributing guidelines. The generated
testoneproject didn't seem to embed the changes I committed before generating it; anyway, such configuration works on my side and should be backed by Ruff's docs as well