-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
[CQT-417] Circuit builder accepts multiple registers #658
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
[CQT-417] Circuit builder accepts multiple registers #658
Conversation
Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com> Co-authored-by: Guy Puts <guy.puts@tno.nl> Co-authored-by: Guy Puts <38719377+GuyPuts@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Juan Boschero <juan.boschero@tno.nl> Co-authored-by: rturrado <rturrado@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Juan Carlos Boschero <juanboschero1998@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: rares1609 <79575613+rares1609@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Oancea <rares.oancea@tno.nl>
Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com> Co-authored-by: rturrado <rturrado@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Juan Boschero <juan.boschero@tno.nl> Co-authored-by: Guy Puts <guy.puts@tno.nl> Co-authored-by: Guy Puts <38719377+GuyPuts@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Juan Carlos Boschero <juanboschero1998@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: rares1609 <79575613+rares1609@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Oancea <rares.oancea@tno.nl>
rares1609
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The issue looks good to me. The CircuitBuilder now accepts multiple (qu)bit registers which can be inserted in-between instructions. I think there are two (minor) points that still need to be addressed before its merged:
- The comment concerning the assert statement, I am not certain whether it is redundant or done on purpose.
- An entry needs to be added to the Changelog.
davidbakker123
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was half way through the review, but rares finished. So I will leave it here :)
No description provided.