Skip to content

Add Python linting workflow configuration#2

Open
LAdam-ix wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
feat-add-lint
Open

Add Python linting workflow configuration#2
LAdam-ix wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
feat-add-lint

Conversation

@LAdam-ix
Copy link
Collaborator

@LAdam-ix LAdam-ix commented Mar 9, 2026

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated GitHub Actions workflow configuration for improved development infrastructure.

@LAdam-ix LAdam-ix requested review from a team, Adames4 and JakubPekar March 9, 2026 09:43
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Note

Gemini is unable to generate a summary for this pull request due to the file types involved not being currently supported.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 9, 2026

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 5f431ece-e98c-40bc-acf8-840b944d6778

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 31bd460 and 3bb5c85.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/python-lint.yml

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Introduces a new GitHub Actions workflow file for Python linting. The workflow triggers on pushes to the main branch, pull requests targeting main, and manual invocation, delegating execution to a reusable workflow maintained in the RationAI organization.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
GitHub Actions Workflow
.github/workflows/python-lint.yml
Added new reusable workflow configuration for Python linting that triggers on main branch events and delegates to external reusable workflow.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Poem

🐰 Hop, skip, and lint we go,
Code quality sets the flow,
With workflows neat and organized tight,
Python standards shining bright!

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The pull request title directly and accurately describes the main change: adding a Python linting workflow configuration file to the repository.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch feat-add-lint

Tip

Try Coding Plans. Let us write the prompt for your AI agent so you can ship faster (with fewer bugs).
Share your feedback on Discord.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@LAdam-ix LAdam-ix requested review from matejpekar and removed request for Adames4 and JakubPekar March 9, 2026 09:46
@LAdam-ix LAdam-ix self-assigned this Mar 9, 2026
@matejpekar matejpekar requested a review from JakubPekar March 9, 2026 11:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants