Skip to content

Refuse to receive worker messages once dead.#37

Open
pkaminski wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
dead-receive
Open

Refuse to receive worker messages once dead.#37
pkaminski wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
dead-receive

Conversation

@pkaminski
Copy link
Member

@pkaminski pkaminski commented Mar 13, 2026

Addresses https://reviewableio.sentry.io/issues/7326447743. It appears that it's possible for a worker to send the crash message (which clears out the deferreds table), but then try to send more responses afterwards.


This change is Reviewable

Addresses https://reviewableio.sentry.io/issues/7326447743.  It appears that
it's possible for a worker to send the `crash` message (which clears out the
`deferreds` table), but then try to send more responses afterwards.
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request resolves an issue where a worker, after sending a crash message and clearing its deferred tasks, could still attempt to send subsequent responses, leading to errors. The changes introduce a mechanism to ensure that once a worker is considered 'dead', it will no longer process any incoming messages, thereby preventing these post-crash communication problems and improving system stability.

Highlights

  • Worker Message Handling: Implemented a safeguard to prevent a worker from processing messages once it has been marked as 'dead', addressing a potential bug where messages could still be received after a crash.
Changelog
  • package.json
    • Incremented the package version from 7.8.3 to 7.8.4.
  • src/Bridge.js
    • Added a conditional check at the beginning of the _receive method to immediately return if the _dead flag is set, preventing further message processing by a dead bridge.
Activity
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for GitHub and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request addresses a race condition where messages from a web worker could be processed after the worker has been marked as dead. The change introduces a guard clause in the _receive method to ignore any incoming messages if the worker is considered dead. This effectively prevents errors from processing further responses from a crashed worker. The implementation is correct and directly solves the reported issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant