Skip to content

ci(workflow): handle all cases work in progress#2162

Open
anunay-xin wants to merge 1 commit intodev-upgradefrom
notify-slack
Open

ci(workflow): handle all cases work in progress#2162
anunay-xin wants to merge 1 commit intodev-upgradefrom
notify-slack

Conversation

@anunay-xin
Copy link
Collaborator

@anunay-xin anunay-xin commented Mar 10, 2026

Proposed changes

Types of changes

What types of changes does your code introduce to XDC network?
Put an in the boxes that apply

  • build: Changes that affect the build system or external dependencies
  • ci: Changes to CI configuration files and scripts
  • chore: Changes that don't change source code or tests
  • docs: Documentation only changes
  • feat: A new feature
  • fix: A bug fix
  • perf: A code change that improves performance
  • refactor: A code change that neither fixes a bug nor adds a feature
  • revert: Revert something
  • style: Changes that do not affect the meaning of the code
  • test: Adding missing tests or correcting existing tests

Impacted Components

Which parts of the codebase does this PR touch?
Put an in the boxes that apply

  • Consensus
  • Account
  • Network
  • Geth
  • Smart Contract
  • External components
  • Not sure (Please specify below)

Checklist

Put an in the boxes once you have confirmed below actions (or provide reasons on not doing so) that

  • This PR has sufficient test coverage (unit/integration test) OR I have provided reason in the PR description for not having test coverage
  • Tested on a private network from the genesis block and monitored the chain operating correctly for multiple epochs.
  • Provide an end-to-end test plan in the PR description on how to manually test it on the devnet/testnet.
  • Tested the backwards compatibility.
  • Tested with XDC nodes running this version co-exist with those running the previous version.
  • Relevant documentation has been updated as part of this PR
  • N/A

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 10, 2026

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 4dd950e1-af0d-46d8-8f50-e32e381e6355

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch notify-slack

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@anunay-xin anunay-xin changed the title ci(workflow): handle Wip all cases ci(workflow): handle all cases work in progress Mar 10, 2026
@gzliudan
Copy link
Collaborator

gzliudan commented Mar 10, 2026

I think we should convert github.event.pull_request.title to lowercase then compare with wip, so we can handle WIp, wIp, and so on.

@gzliudan
Copy link
Collaborator

gzliudan commented Mar 10, 2026

BTW, please notice some words contain string wip, such as wipe‌

@anunay-xin
Copy link
Collaborator Author

contain string wip, such as wipe‌

Yes let me think how to handle these cases

@gzliudan
Copy link
Collaborator

contain string wip, such as wipe‌

Yes let me think how to handle these cases

I created a WIP label:

4138146d-18b2-4617-8733-b73bfc2834e9

Can you check label ?

@gzliudan
Copy link
Collaborator

contain string wip, such as wipe‌

Yes let me think how to handle these cases

Or you can extract the first 5 letters, convert it to lowercase, then check if contains wip

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants