docs(specs): Java SDK RFC — pin a2aproject/a2a-java as A2A anchor#4279
Open
docs(specs): Java SDK RFC — pin a2aproject/a2a-java as A2A anchor#4279
Conversation
Replaces the vague "track upstream maturity" in Open Question 3 with an explicit switch trigger (first a2a-java ≥ 1.0.0 stable tag) and links the upstream releases page so the trigger is visible. Addresses MichielDean's review comment on #4145 that landed after the RFC was merged. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
MichielDean
approved these changes
May 10, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
a2aproject/a2a-javaas the explicit A2A library anchor in the §MCP and A2A architecture sectiona2a-javastable release (≥ 1.0.0 on the releases page)a2a-javatypes pre-1.0 vs. keep types in-tree until stable; default: in-tree until stable)Addresses @MichielDean's review comment on #4145 (discussion thread) that landed after the RFC was admin-merged. Acknowledging the miss in the reply on that thread.
Docs-only. No code, no schema changes.
Test plan