Skip to content

Conversation

@prasanna-anchorage
Copy link
Contributor

(Mostly for testing Claude Code, do not merge as is)

This report provides a detailed analysis of the VisualSign Parser codebase:

Coverage Analysis (per-package with lcov):

  • visualsign-core: 84.65% (40 tests) ✅ EXCELLENT
  • visualsign-ethereum: 41.19% (36 tests) - ERC20/Uniswap: 98%+, core needs work
  • visualsign-solana: 73.16% (29 tests) - Jupiter: 91.3%, but Stakepool: 11.6%
  • visualsign-sui: 20 tests (coverage tool issue to investigate)
  • visualsign-tron: 0% (0 tests) - CRITICAL GAP
  • visualsign-unspecified: 0% (0 tests) - CRITICAL GAP
  • parser-app: 3.28% (1 test) - CRITICAL GAP

Idiomatic Rust Analysis:

  • Overall code quality is GOOD
  • Excellent error handling, type safety, and modern patterns
  • Strong lint configuration (#![deny(clippy::unwrap_used)])
  • Minor improvements suggested for iterator usage and error enums

Priority Recommendations:

  1. CRITICAL: Add integration tests for parser-app (currently 3.28%)
  2. CRITICAL: Test Solana stakepool preset (currently 11.6%)
  3. HIGH: Improve Ethereum core coverage (currently 41.19%)
  4. HIGH: Investigate Sui coverage tool compatibility
  5. HIGH: Add tests for TRON parser (0%) or document as unsupported

The report includes a detailed implementation roadmap, testing strategy, and specific file locations for all identified issues.

This report provides a detailed analysis of the VisualSign Parser codebase:

Coverage Analysis (per-package with lcov):
- visualsign-core: 84.65% (40 tests) ✅ EXCELLENT
- visualsign-ethereum: 41.19% (36 tests) - ERC20/Uniswap: 98%+, core needs work
- visualsign-solana: 73.16% (29 tests) - Jupiter: 91.3%, but Stakepool: 11.6%
- visualsign-sui: 20 tests (coverage tool issue to investigate)
- visualsign-tron: 0% (0 tests) - CRITICAL GAP
- visualsign-unspecified: 0% (0 tests) - CRITICAL GAP
- parser-app: 3.28% (1 test) - CRITICAL GAP

Idiomatic Rust Analysis:
- Overall code quality is GOOD
- Excellent error handling, type safety, and modern patterns
- Strong lint configuration (#![deny(clippy::unwrap_used)])
- Minor improvements suggested for iterator usage and error enums

Priority Recommendations:
1. CRITICAL: Add integration tests for parser-app (currently 3.28%)
2. CRITICAL: Test Solana stakepool preset (currently 11.6%)
3. HIGH: Improve Ethereum core coverage (currently 41.19%)
4. HIGH: Investigate Sui coverage tool compatibility
5. HIGH: Add tests for TRON parser (0%) or document as unsupported

The report includes a detailed implementation roadmap, testing strategy,
and specific file locations for all identified issues.
This PR adds a sophisticated CI workflow for tracking test coverage with:

Features:
- Per-package coverage analysis using cargo-llvm-cov
- Dependency-aware testing (auto-tests packages that depend on changes)
- Coverage diff reports comparing PR vs base branch
- Automated PR comments with detailed coverage breakdown
- Threshold enforcement with configurable limits
- Module-level coverage breakdown in reports

Workflow Components:
1. detect-changes: Identifies changed packages and their dependents
2. coverage: Runs tests and generates lcov reports (matrix strategy)
3. coverage-report: Compares with base and posts PR comment
4. coverage-status: Enforces thresholds and fails if needed

Scripts:
- detect-changed-packages.sh: Finds affected packages using git diff
- parse-coverage.sh: Extracts statistics from lcov files
- generate-coverage-diff.sh: Creates markdown reports with diffs
- check-coverage-thresholds.sh: Validates against configured limits
- get-base-coverage.sh: Downloads base branch coverage for comparison

Configuration:
- .github/coverage-config.yml: Per-package thresholds and policies
- Configurable critical/warning/good thresholds
- Max coverage drop limits (e.g., fail if drops > 5%)
- Package groups for organized reporting

Example PR Comment Output:
```
📦 Package Coverage
| Package             | Coverage | Change      | Status       |
|---------------------|----------|-------------|--------------|
| visualsign          | 84.65%   | ➡️ 0.00%   | ✅ Excellent |
| visualsign-solana   | 75.23%   | 📈 +2.07%  | 🟢 Good      |
| parser_app          | 45.50%   | 📉 -3.22%  | 🔴 Critical  |
```

Benefits:
- Immediate visibility into coverage impact of changes
- Prevents accidental coverage drops
- Encourages test-driven development
- Tracks coverage trends over time
- Identifies packages needing more tests

Documentation:
- .github/COVERAGE.md: Complete guide for developers
- Includes troubleshooting, best practices, and examples
- Documents threshold levels and policies

Related to: IDIOMATIC_RUST_AND_COVERAGE_REPORT.md analysis
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants