Skip to content

VR: dnsmasq does not listen on 127.0.0.1#10440

Closed
weizhouapache wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:4.19from
weizhouapache:4.19-fix-shared-network-dhcp-leases
Closed

VR: dnsmasq does not listen on 127.0.0.1#10440
weizhouapache wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:4.19from
weizhouapache:4.19-fix-shared-network-dhcp-leases

Conversation

@weizhouapache
Copy link
Member

@weizhouapache weizhouapache commented Feb 21, 2025

Description

This PR fixes #10436

More info at #10436 (comment)

Types of changes

  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
  • Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
  • build/CI
  • test (unit or integration test code)

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Feature/Enhancement Scale

  • Major
  • Minor

Bug Severity

  • BLOCKER
  • Critical
  • Major
  • Minor
  • Trivial

Screenshots (if appropriate):

How Has This Been Tested?

How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?

@weizhouapache
Copy link
Member Author

@blueorangutan package

@blueorangutan
Copy link

@weizhouapache a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 21, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 15.15%. Comparing base (e196275) to head (6532246).
Report is 38 commits behind head on 4.19.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               4.19   #10440   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     15.15%   15.15%           
  Complexity    11314    11314           
=========================================
  Files          5413     5413           
  Lines        474704   474704           
  Branches      57893    57893           
=========================================
  Hits          71942    71942           
  Misses       394717   394717           
  Partials       8045     8045           
Flag Coverage Δ
uitests 4.29% <ø> (ø)
unittests 15.87% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Copy link
Contributor

@DaanHoogland DaanHoogland left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

clgtm, but needs testing with loads of networks.

@blueorangutan
Copy link

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 12533

@DaanHoogland
Copy link
Contributor

@blueorangutan test

@blueorangutan
Copy link

@DaanHoogland a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + kvm-ol8) has been kicked to run smoke tests

@blueorangutan
Copy link

[SF] Trillian test result (tid-12485)
Environment: kvm-ol8 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server ol8
Total time taken: 44004 seconds
Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr10440-t12485-kvm-ol8.zip
Smoke tests completed. 133 look OK, 0 have errors, 0 did not run
Only failed and skipped tests results shown below:

Test Result Time (s) Test File

@weizhouapache weizhouapache marked this pull request as ready for review March 6, 2025 14:36
@weizhouapache weizhouapache added this to the 4.19.3 milestone Mar 28, 2025
@JoaoJandre
Copy link
Contributor

@weizhouapache could you add some explanation on the cause of #10436 and how this PR fixes it?

Maybe I've missed it on the issue but I was not able to find it there. Without context, it is hard to judge if these changes are ok or not.

@weizhouapache
Copy link
Member Author

@weizhouapache could you add some explanation on the cause of #10436 and how this PR fixes it?

Maybe I've missed it on the issue but I was not able to find it there. Without context, it is hard to judge if these changes are ok or not.

@JoaoJandre
Refer to my comment #10436 (comment)

ACS indeed tried to release the ip but the lease file was not changed.

You can test shared network with ACS 4.20

@weizhouapache
Copy link
Member Author

I tried to reproduce the issue today, but failed

I am closing the PR. will re-visit later.

cc @DaanHoogland @vishesh92 @JoaoJandre

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

VR: DHCP doesn't work on new instance "not using configured address ... because it is leased to ..."

4 participants