[WIP] Out-of-band management (OOBM) improvements

[sureshanaparti]

Description

This PR improves the Out-of-band management (OOBM) logs / code.

Types of changes

• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
• Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
• Build/CI
• Test (unit or integration test code)

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Feature/Enhancement Scale

• Major
• Minor

Bug Severity

• BLOCKER
• Critical
• Major
• Minor
• Trivial

Screenshots (if appropriate):

How Has This Been Tested?

How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?

[sureshanaparti]

@blueorangutan package

[blueorangutan]

@sureshanaparti a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 13.79310% with 25 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 17.56%. Comparing base (2dbc86a) to head (f8e8320).
⚠️ Report is 378 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...va/org/apache/cloudstack/kvm/ha/KVMHAProvider.java	16.00%	21 Missing ⚠️
...bandmanagement/OutOfBandManagementServiceImpl.java	0.00%	4 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               main   #11996   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     17.56%   17.56%           
+ Complexity    15542    15540    -2     
=========================================
  Files          5909     5909           
  Lines        529058   529065    +7     
  Branches      64617    64619    +2     
=========================================
+ Hits          92922    92931    +9     
+ Misses       425683   425680    -3     
- Partials      10453    10454    +1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
uitests	3.58% <ø> (ø)
unittests	18.63% <13.79%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[blueorangutan]

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ el10 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 15647

[github-actions]

This PR is stale because it has been open for 120 days with no activity. It may be removed by administrators of this project at any time. Remove the stale label or comment to request for removal of it to prevent this.