Skip to content
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion bip-0360/ref-impl/common/tests/data/p2mr_construction.json
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@
"bip350Address": "bc1zdskuzp4ts94h87ws0c7drmev3sf9dagewj8qsylyahfyqhf800hsam4d6e",
"scriptPathControlBlocks": [
"c1f224a923cd0021ab202ab139cc56802ddb92dcfc172b9212261a539df79a112a",
"c18ad69ec7cf41c2a4001fd1f738bf1e505ce2277acdcaa63fe4765192497f47a7"
"fb8ad69ec7cf41c2a4001fd1f738bf1e505ce2277acdcaa63fe4765192497f47a7"
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@murchandamus murchandamus Mar 16, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@EthanHeilman: The description of the test states that the two leaves have different leaf versions and the second leaf uses a hypothetical leaf version of 250 (see line 74).

One of the reasons I surface this is to ask whether you want to take the proposed action or whether you want to do something else, or additional actions if this is indicative of other issues in your reference implementation. E.g., what was this test with different leaf versions supposed to test? Is it an issue that it didn’t test that and still passed?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@EthanHeilman EthanHeilman Mar 16, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ahh, this test case is about different leaf versions, that makes sense. I probably should have noticed the name of the test case was p2mr_different_version_leaves I retract my comment.

I don't maintain the reference implementation. @cryptoquick is taking care of it.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry, I should have distinguished. The first line was in response to you, but the rest was generally directed at the authors.

]
}
},
Expand Down