🔥 Simplify PR template

[LegeBeker]

🔍 Samenvatting

Deze PR zorgt dat er maar 1 PR template is, omdat dit de enige is die wordt gebruikt.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

Pull request consolidates multiple Dutch-language PR templates into a unified template structure. The main template file is updated with Dutch headers and a standardized checklist, while five specific template files and template content are deleted.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Main PR Template Update \.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE\.md	Replaces English header with Dutch "## 🔍 Samenvatting", adds "## 📝 Beschrijving" section, removes "General Templates" and "Specific templates" sections with associated links, and replaces template link blocks with Dutch three-item checklist (local testing, tests added/updated, documentation updated if needed).
Template Files Deleted \.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/documentation\.md, feature\.md, fix\.md, general-extended\.md, general-small\.md, refactor\.md	Six template files removed, including content for documentation, feature, fix, general-extended, general-small, and refactor templates. All contained Dutch-language PR guidance sections but are consolidated into the main template.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title 'Simplify PR template' accurately describes the main change: consolidating multiple PR templates into a single template.
Description check	✅ Passed	The description explains the purpose of the change: consolidating to one PR template because only one is used, which is directly related to the changeset.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch simplify-pr-template

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5f62fba and bae0758.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md

🧰 Additional context used

🪛 GitHub Actions: Shared Lint Markdown Workflow

.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md

[error] 1-1: MD041/first-line-heading/first-line-h1 First line in a file should be a top-level heading

🪛 GitHub Check: Lint Markdown

.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md

[failure] 1-1: First line in a file should be a top-level heading
shared/.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md:1 MD041/first-line-heading/first-line-h1 First line in a file should be a top-level heading [Context: "## 🔍 Samenvatting"] https://github.com/DavidAnson/markdownlint/blob/v0.37.4/doc/md041.md

---

[failure] 1-1: First line in a file should be a top-level heading
.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md:1 MD041/first-line-heading/first-line-h1 First line in a file should be a top-level heading [Context: "## 🔍 Samenvatting"] https://github.com/DavidAnson/markdownlint/blob/v0.37.4/doc/md041.md

🪛 LanguageTool

.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md

[grammar] ~13-~13: Fout gevonden
Context: ...✅ Checklist - [ ] Code is lokaal getest - [ ] Tests zijn toegevoegd/aangepast - [ ...

(QB_NEW_NL_OTHER_ERROR_IDS_REPLACEMENT_ORTHOGRAPHY_SPELLING)

---

[grammar] ~14-~14: Fout gevonden
Context: ...st - [ ] Tests zijn toegevoegd/aangepast - [ ] Documentatie bijgewerkt (indien nodi...

(QB_NEW_NL_OTHER_ERROR_IDS_REPLACEMENT_ORTHOGRAPHY_SPELLING)

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 3

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

.github/workflows/label-sync.yml (1)

1-2: Optional: Remove unnecessary YAML frontmatter and blank line.

The YAML frontmatter (---) on line 1 and the blank line on line 2 are optional and can be removed for cleaner formatting in GitHub Actions workflows.

🔎 Proposed cleanup

----
-
 name: Label Sync

📜 Review details

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 40868b9 and 5f62fba.

📒 Files selected for processing (8)

• .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md
• .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/documentation.md
• .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/feature.md
• .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/fix.md
• .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/general-extended.md
• .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/general-small.md
• .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/refactor.md
• .github/workflows/label-sync.yml

💤 Files with no reviewable changes (6)

• .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/documentation.md
• .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/general-small.md
• .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/general-extended.md
• .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/feature.md
• .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/fix.md
• .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/refactor.md

🧰 Additional context used

🪛 GitHub Actions: Shared Lint Markdown Workflow

.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md

[error] 1-1: markdownlint: MD041/first-line-heading/first-line-h1 First line in a file should be a top-level heading. Update the first line to be a level-1 heading.

🪛 GitHub Check: Lint Markdown

.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md

[failure] 1-1: First line in a file should be a top-level heading
shared/.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md:1 MD041/first-line-heading/first-line-h1 First line in a file should be a top-level heading [Context: "## 🔍 Samenvatting"] https://github.com/DavidAnson/markdownlint/blob/v0.37.4/doc/md041.md

---

[failure] 1-1: First line in a file should be a top-level heading
.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md:1 MD041/first-line-heading/first-line-h1 First line in a file should be a top-level heading [Context: "## 🔍 Samenvatting"] https://github.com/DavidAnson/markdownlint/blob/v0.37.4/doc/md041.md

🪛 LanguageTool

.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md

[grammar] ~17-~17: Fout gevonden
Context: ...✅ Checklist - [ ] Code is lokaal getest - [ ] Tests zijn toegevoegd/aangepast - [ ...

(QB_NEW_NL_OTHER_ERROR_IDS_REPLACEMENT_ORTHOGRAPHY_SPELLING)

---

[grammar] ~18-~18: Fout gevonden
Context: ...st - [ ] Tests zijn toegevoegd/aangepast - [ ] Documentatie bijgewerkt (indien nodi...

(QB_NEW_NL_OTHER_ERROR_IDS_REPLACEMENT_ORTHOGRAPHY_SPELLING)

🔇 Additional comments (1)

.github/workflows/label-sync.yml (1)

5-13: LGTM! Appropriate triggers and permissions.

The event triggers (schedule, workflow_dispatch, repository_dispatch) are well-suited for a label-sync workflow, and the issues: write permission is correctly specified for label operations.