Add Jammy stemcell ops file #1294
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
hamideh-amini-khezrabad
requested review from
a team and
iaftab-alam
and removed request for
a team
oliver-heinrich
approved these changes
Dec 10, 2025
oliver-heinrich
left a comment
oliver-heinrich
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM, but we should update in the docu https://github.com/cloudfoundry/cf-deployment/blob/main/operations/README.md and describe the new ops file along with this PR
jochenehret
previously approved these changes
Dec 12, 2025
Contributor
|
Hello friend, it looks like your pull request has failed one or more of our checks. Please take a look! 👀 |
hamideh-amini-khezrabad
force-pushed
the
jammy_stemcell_ops
branch
from
0043f88 to
7052280
Compare
hamideh-amini-khezrabad
requested review from
a team and
jochenehret
and removed request for
iaftab-alam
jochenehret
reviewed
Dec 12, 2025
| | [`windows2019-cell.yml`](windows2019-cell.yml) | Deploys a windows2019 cell. | Requires that a windows2019 stemcell is uploaded to the Bosh director, and be used together with `use-online-windows2019fs.yml` or a suitable opsfile. | **YES** | | ||
| | [`use-cflinuxfs4-compat.yml`](use-cflinuxfs4-compat.yml) | Use the [cflinuxfs4 compatibility release](https://github.com/cloudfoundry/cflinuxfs4-compat-release) instead of the default [cflinuxfs4 release](https://github.com/cloudfoundry/cflinuxfs4-release). | **YES** | | ||
| | [`use-noble-stemcell.yml`](use-noble-stemcell.yml) | Use Noble stemcell instead of Jammy | This is incompatible with `use-compiled-releases.yml` | **NO** | | ||
| | [`use-jammy-stemcell.yml`](use-jammy-stemcell.yml) | Use Jammy stemcell for backwards compatibility after stemcell migration to Noble | This is incompatible with `use-compiled-releases.yml` | **NO** | |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The "validated" column entry can be changed to "YES" once we have the Jammy pipeline running, please don't forget to update.
jochenehret
approved these changes
Dec 12, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
WHAT is this change about?
add "use-jammy-stemcell" ops file.
What customer problem is being addressed? Use customer persona to define the problem e.g. Alana is unable to...
migration from Jammy to Noble.
Please provide any contextual information.
https://bosh.cloudfoundry.org/stemcells/#ubuntu-noble
Has a cf-deployment including this change passed cf-acceptance-tests?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change? Please take a moment to read through the examples before answering the question.
How should this change be described in cf-deployment release notes?
A new ops file /operations/use-jammy-stemcell.yml has been added to switch back to Jammy for backward compatibility.
Does this PR introduce a new BOSH release into the base cf-deployment.yml manifest or any ops-files?
Does this PR make a change to an experimental or GA'd feature/component?
Please provide Acceptance Criteria for this change?
What is the level of urgency for publishing this change?