Conversation
PR Reviewer Guide 🔍(Review updated until commit 5fe976d)Here are some key observations to aid the review process:
|
PR Code Suggestions ✨Latest suggestions up to 5fe976d
Previous suggestionsSuggestions up to commit f21b728
|
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2438 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 84.34% 84.33% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 141 141
Lines 10803 10803
==========================================
- Hits 9112 9111 -1
- Misses 1691 1692 +1 Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
…e diff handling and Codex integration
…for better risk assessment
8920b23 to
f4cea10
Compare
|
Persistent review updated to latest commit 5fe976d |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 5fe976d13b
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| set -euo pipefail | ||
| python3 - <<'PY' | ||
| import os | ||
| path = os.environ["CONTEXT_FILE"] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This feels confusing, if the context file size will be capped, how can I know that something I add to the VETTING_POLICY is actually being used?
| continue | ||
| fi | ||
|
|
||
| { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
why not initially write most of the file before the if then append the DIFF if it exsits? No need to repeat everything
| You are a Rust supply-chain security auditor. | ||
|
|
||
| Task: | ||
| - Assess ONLY the code changes shown in the provided diff for supply-chain/security risk. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
isn't most of these in the VETTING_POLICY.md already?
User description
Concise Summary
The intent of this PR is to automate cargo-vet for Dependabot crate bumps. It runs automatically on Dependabot PRs and can also be manually dispatched on any branch.
How It Works
Diagram Walkthrough
File Walkthrough
dependabot-auto-vet.yml
Create Dependabot cargo-vet workflow.github/workflows/dependabot-auto-vet.yml
VETTING_CONTEXT.md
Extend vetting context guidelinesVETTING_CONTEXT.md
cargo vet certifyPR Type
Enhancement
Description
Add Dependabot cargo-vet workflow
Remove obsolete VETTING_CONTEXT.md file
Add supply-chain/vet/VETTING_POLICY.md policy
Diagram Walkthrough
File Walkthrough
dependabot-auto-vet.yml
Add Dependabot cargo-vet workflow.github/workflows/dependabot-auto-vet.yml
VETTING_CONTEXT.md
Remove obsolete vetting contextVETTING_CONTEXT.md
VETTING_POLICY.md
Add vetting policy filesupply-chain/vet/VETTING_POLICY.md